not exactly.
Leon & Colby would be good test since they have great wrestling.
Luque is as dangerous as Burns IMO and you still have Belal.
Khamzat is ranked 11. He shouldn't expect a title shot with one fight within the top 5.
If anything, this is a no-win fight for Burns, since he would be beating a guy outside the top 10, which is supposed to be expected that he wins and also supposed to award him less points than beating someone within the top 10..
I wonder just how much the size diffrence will be.Burns BJJ is definitely dangerous, however I can see it going like Khamzat vs GM3
There are guys fighting at 135lbs who are 6'3"
Cormier was world champion at heavyweight around 5'10"
Height is largely irrelevant.
Khamzat is an enormous welterweight.
1- given how one sidedly he demolished Li do you really feel like a top 5 fight isn't reasonable at this point?that's an asinine comment by someone who is obviously a Khamzat fanboy.
You are forgiven (since I know where you are coming from), but it does not mean it is beyond hypocrite to make such claim.
Regardless of your thoughts of how good he is, he is ranked #11. That is a fact.
If you trust your hero, then you should trust he can climb through the rankings properly.
Claiming "it is the biggest fight" is a retarded argument, since this is not a popularity contest, but a proper sport, with proper rankings (or supposed to be, if fans like you were not such hypocrites).
Look, Li was a good test. but let us not forget he was also climbing up, and not someone who was ever within the top 10.1- given how one sidedly he demolished Li do you really feel like a top 5 fight isn't reasonable at this point?
I get the "work you way up" idea, but also want to see him challenged. If #11 couldn't land a single strike on him why not expedite the process. If he is unworthy then surely he will be exposed, right?
Also factor in the current dominant champ who has cleaned out the division. Wouldn't you rather see him face the potentially major test in Khamzat (should he pass his top 5 test) rather than retire without facing the next generation, leaving.us to forever say "what if?"
2- I like your prior "I quite disagree" comment. Nice to see civil debate.
Burns will not win this fight off his back, so no it’s not really a good match up if your thinking his Bjj skills will save him, burns is no Maia off his back.
Khamzat is big but there are others who step into the cage heavier than him at WW.
"So why rush?"Look, Li was a good test. but let us not forget he was also climbing up, and not someone who was ever within the top 10.
I do think two things:
1) sometimes the UFC hold fighters inside the top 10 just because of their name value.
That has to change (so more fighters can climb up).
but it also comes with a
2) - Fighters should need to climb through the rankings period!
He demolished Li, great! Let him do this with someone within the top 10 then within the top 5.
Leon, Luque and even Belal fought their way up into the top 5.
Isn't it unfair to have someone just leapfrog them?
IMO if Leon is next, if the champ is not ready, then have Luque fight Leon for the next in line.
Meanwhile, Have Khamzat/Burns winner fight Belal for the shot after that.
This way you are being fair to everyone and no one jumps the line.
I am not against someone jumping the line if they proved themselves. But you know a fight does not always shows everything. And Khamzat has only 10 fights in his resume.
I feel he is unproven, despite his record or how he won... and I do think we have time to see him prove his worth, so why rush?
Look, I hear you."So why rush?"
So we can see Khamzat vs Usman before Usman retires.
Other than that I don't necessarily have a problem with anything you said.
All fair points, though maybe a smidge more held in strict accordance with values I would perhaps flex on in certain circumstances due to short shelf life of fighters, only 1-3 fights per year and desire to see certain matchups that I consider more exciting for personal reasons/preferences.