GGG vs Canelo = Robbery of the year candidate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 363827
  • Start date Start date
Gennady won, hands down. Canelo was red as cherry flavored iced from 7/11 from the shots he was eating
 
I saw Golovkin effected by punches multiple times, one body shot in particular hurt him pretty bad. Roy commented on it during the fight too.

I saw golovkin being stopped in his tracks multiple times , I never saw him get wobbled or visibly hurt. I've watched the fight 3 times now and I can comfortably say (my opinion) ggg was robbed big time
 
I think Teddy Atlas's score of 118-110 for GGG is a way more ridiculous outcome than a split decision draw.
 
A draw in this fight isn't a robbery. I had GGG up by 2-4 rounds depending on how you view different aspects of the fight. I could see how someone might see it differently with a slight edge to Canelo. A draw isn't how I saw it but in a fight that close, I'm cool with that and cool with a rematch.

The robbery is the blind judge. But think about it... if she had a 115-113 for Canelo, we would still be looking at a draw.

They just need to run it back with better judges and same ref.
 
Nearly every round was a toss up. A draw imo is exactly the right score. 118-110, I just don't see that, but I could even see the score in favour of Canelo. Almost every round was very difficult to judge.
 
Not a robbery by any means. A draw was fair depending on how you see jabs VS power punches. The only problem in this fight was the one judge, that judge could have scored it much closer but still in favor of canelo.
 
I had this fight 116-112 Golovkin, but I'm a mma guy, so if a judge had this 115-113 Alvarez, I wouldn't scream, I'd assume my own lack of knowledge. But giving Alvarez TEN rounds!?!?! You'd have to give him rounds where Golovkin had more volume AND hit harder.

What the hell am I missing?
 
Watched it twice now. First time i had it 7-5 to GGG, found it the same second time, but can see where a draw comes from. I just didn't see a Canelo win in watching it twice. Great fight though. I think before the rematch though, they both get a round with Adalaide Byrd....
 
nah. not a robbery. close fight. I had it 8-4 GGG. But I can see 7-5 or even 6-6. I can't see Canelo winning outright.

once I get over the disappintment of terrible judging (again), I will reflect on a great fight and look forward to the re-match
 
Lol at robbery of the year, you only have watched this boxing match and Floyd vs Conor?

Pacquiao vs Horn and Chocolatito vs Rungvisai I were worse

A draw is not a robbery imo, scored it 115-113 GGG but can see where the draw comes from
 
Would love to see a scorecard round by round of anyone who does not have it for GGG.

Round 1: 10-9 Canelo
Round 2: 10-9 Canelo
Round 3: 10-9 GGG
Round 4: 10-9 Canelo
round 5: 10-9 Canelo
Round 6: 10-9 GGG
Round 7: 10-9 GGG
Round 8: 10-9 GGG
Round 9: 10-9 Canelo
Round 10: 10-9 Canelo
Round 11: 10-9 GGG
Round 12: 10-9 Canelo

So I scored it 7 rounds to 5, with Canelo winning 115-113.

It was a super close fight and rounds 3, 5, 9, and 10 were super close and comeptitive and could have gone either way.

Golovkin was stalking Canelo eating shots and constantly pushing foward. GGG won many rounds just off the fact that he was the aggressor and Canelo wasn't doing much but using his footwork and defense to back up. GGG was missing alot in the begining of the fight and IMO Canelo landed the more memorable and significant shots and combinations.

Canelo outlanded him in total punches in rounds 2,3,4,5,6,7,11, and 12, and overall landing a higher percentage of punches.

Canelo outlanded GGG in power punches in rounds 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 10,11, and 12. And overall landed more puncher punches by a large margin.

I thought it was a super close fight, and I can see how some people think GGG won since he had ring control, pushed the pace, and was the aggressor as Canelo took some of the middle rounds off, however it was still super close. There were a handful of rounds that could have gone either way in my opinion, so a draw was an appropriate result. A championship fight of that caliber which is that close, doesn't really deserve to be rewarded a winner since neither did enough to say they are the winner of the fight. However if I had to go with a winner I would have to choose Canelo, even though many of the rounds I rewarded him were super competitive and I could see someone scoring those rounds for GGG as well.,
 
Round 1: 10-9 Canelo
Round 2: 10-9 Canelo
Round 3: 10-9 GGG
Round 4: 10-9 Canelo
round 5: 10-9 Canelo
Round 6: 10-9 GGG
Round 7: 10-9 GGG
Round 8: 10-9 GGG
Round 9: 10-9 Canelo
Round 10: 10-9 Canelo
Round 11: 10-9 GGG
Round 12: 10-9 Canelo

So I scored it 7 rounds to 5, with Canelo winning 115-113.

It was a super close fight and rounds 3, 5, 9, and 10 were super close and comeptitive and could have gone either way.

Golovkin was stalking Canelo eating shots and constantly pushing foward. GGG won many rounds just off the fact that he was the aggressor and Canelo wasn't doing much but using his footwork and defense to back up. GGG was missing alot in the begining of the fight and IMO Canelo landed the more memorable and significant shots and combinations.

Canelo outlanded him in total punches in rounds 2,3,4,5,6,7,11, and 12, and overall landing a higher percentage of punches.

Canelo outlanded GGG in power punches in rounds 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 10,11, and 12. And overall landed more puncher punches by a large margin.

I thought it was a super close fight, and I can see how some people think GGG won since he had ring control, pushed the pace, and was the aggressor as Canelo took some of the middle rounds off, however it was still super close. There were a handful of rounds that could have gone either way in my opinion, so a draw was an appropriate result. A championship fight of that caliber which is that close, doesn't really deserve to be rewarded a winner since neither did enough to say they are the winner of the fight. However if I had to go with a winner I would have to choose Canelo, even though many of the rounds I rewarded him were super competitive and I could see someone scoring those rounds for GGG as well.,

You are completely off on your punch stats. Why even post false shit like this?


 
Meh. Canelo was throwing shots that were't phasing GGG who just walked through them. Canelo throws nice crisp punches and recoils his arm with self satisfied style but he wasn't punching effectively. I define punching effectively as hurting the opposition or at least dissuading them from doing what they want. And after the first few rounds, Canelo's punching wasn't dissuading GGG from going where he wanted. This isn't fencing, you can't just touch a guy to score. GGG hits you everywhere and hits you everywhere hard. That is part of his strategy, to physically beat you up all over and break you down. So it's not right to not count shots that don't land cleanly even though they're clearly having an impact as evidenced by Canelo being on his bike all night.
You are biased. Canelo is a counter puncher and stood against the ropes multiple times taking everything GGG had to give out. Guess what? Your monster punching GGG didn't phase Canelo either.
 
Is any close fight not a robbery anymore?

Were at the point where people say a fight is close and in the next post call it a robbery.
 
Meh. Canelo was throwing shots that were't phasing GGG who just walked through them. Canelo throws nice crisp punches and recoils his arm with self satisfied style but he wasn't punching effectively. I define punching effectively as hurting the opposition or at least dissuading them from doing what they want. And after the first few rounds, Canelo's punching wasn't dissuading GGG from going where he wanted. This isn't fencing, you can't just touch a guy to score. GGG hits you everywhere and hits you everywhere hard. That is part of his strategy, to physically beat you up all over and break you down. So it's not right to not count shots that don't land cleanly even though they're clearly having an impact as evidenced by Canelo being on his bike all night.
By your account Golovkin didnt do anything either.
 
I originally had GGG edging it but after watching it again I'm pretty happy with it being a draw because it was close. You cant call this fight a robbery. There's an argument for both sides. Hopefully there will be a more decisive victory in the rematch. Still don't get how that judge came up with 118 - 110 tho.
You should be tested as well...
 
Which were literally all jabs.

Canelo out landed him in power punches let alone MUCH cleaner ones.

It qas a close fight that could have gone either way. No robbery.
lol Canelo's "power punches" smh... his post speech = couldn't even believe his own words coming out of his mouth.. Oscar de la Hoya did everything to make sure his golden boy wouldn't get a loss
 
Back
Top