MMA.....
Gane took Francis down and was credited with two submission attempts. If a fighter is credited with a submission attempt it means it was effective offense, take the commentary out of it.
So how would a sweep and maintaining position be a more effective use of grappling in terms of the MMA scoring criteria which values damage?
You're talking out of two sides of your mouth. And you're citing MMA being the sport where Gane should win the round due to his grappling when it's the sport LEAST likely to give him a W.
Gane got a takedown into half guard. Advantage Gane.
Francis retreated to open guard (improvement Francis, but Gane is on top). Neutral or advantage Gane.
From open guard, Gane got swept onto his back. Advantage Francis.
From there, Gane attempted two submissions. Advantage Gane.
From there, he was mounted. Advantage Francis.
From there, he retreated to half guard, where he spent over half the round on his back, on bottom, in half guard. Big advantage Francis. 2:44 of top position control.
In MMA, half guard is not a 50-50 position of points. Person on top is in a more advantageous position.
So how exactly do you quantify that getting a takedown into guard and then getting swept onto your back is more effective grappling than being on top for 2:44? In ANY sport, but especially MMA.