Gane vs Volkov is closer than you think - Round 2 in particular was a toss up

Hazuki Ryo

Brown Belt
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
3,343
Reaction score
4,590
R3 was the only clear round for Volkov. you could argue round 1 could have gone for Gane, for round 2 was closer than some might think.

Volkov had the spinning back fist but Gane had significant strikes of his own and good combinations, plus he had the takedown

Here are the fight stats :

Capture d'écran 2024-12-08 105319.png

I think a draw would have been correct
 
Last edited:
Rounds with no clear winner should be scored 10-10, because the fact is some rounds are too damn even or uneventful to truly give it to one fighter or the other. As it is, judges are basically implored to do a coin flip on 50/50 rounds and who knows if they're basing it on one random punch, an interpretation of control or some other insignificant thing.

If that means more draws, so be it, at least the scoring will be more accurate. And I'd rather see that than a result that a majority of people don't accept as legitimate.
 
Volkov had Gane hurt in a pretty close round. He landed more quality shots and I gave him round 2 and 3 clearly.

It’s not some all time robbery but it’s still not a great decision.
 
I thought Gane spent round 3 going for submission while Volkov did pitter patter arm punches for less than half the round. Was 1-1 going into 3rd. I guess Gane was closer to winning it, but not sure how it fits the judging criteria. I thought it was a hard fight to judge.
 
Rounds with no clear winner should be scored 10-10, because the fact is some rounds are too damn even or uneventful to truly give it to one fighter or the other. As it is, judges are basically implored to do a coin flip on 50/50 rounds and who knows if they're basing it on one random punch, an interpretation of control or some other insignificant thing.

If that means more draws, so be it, at least the scoring will be more accurate. And I'd rather see that than a result that a majority of people don't accept as legitimate.
The solution is to have more 10-10 rounds but to also have judges score the fight as a whole as a tiebreak when their scorecard is tied.
 
I haven't seen any media scores that gave it to Gane, and 90% here and 91% of fan scoring on mmadecisions scored it for Volkov, and it's not like Volkov is some huge star or incredibly popular fighter to claim every fan and media scoring were biased.

I thought 2-1 for Volkov, but 3-0 Volkov would have been more reasonable than scoring it for Gane.


Edit: it's now 92% on both as more people have given their opinions.
 
Last edited:
Like others have implied. Looking at statistics to decide who should have won a fight is fucking stupid.

They may have landed a similar amount of strikes in round 2, but anybody who actually watched the fight would know Volkov was landing cleaner, harder and more damaging shots that were hurting Gane.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,261,851
Messages
57,122,235
Members
175,546
Latest member
cristhian.jimenezv
Back
Top