- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
- Messages
- 66,627
- Reaction score
- 38,588
In landscape mode the phone is about the same width as the Nintendo Switch (Switch= 6.81" vs. ROG= 6.73"). The controller isn't attached while you're using it as a phone. Turned upright, like a phone, it is 24% narrower (Switch= 4.01" vs. ROG = 3.06"). It isn't any wider than the mainstream handsets, and should be easy to hold in one hand. In spite of these smaller dimensions it actually has the slightly larger screen area (Switch = 16.43" vs. ROG= 16.52"). It's also siginificantly less thick (Switch= 14mm vs. ROG=9.5mm).Guys stop that shit please.
And yes that phone is giant and it is double giant with that effing controller.
I doubt it will sell good, because it is still same old qualcomm inside, same as cheaper competition, and same limited number of meh games.
What would PROBABLY sell good would be a $100 universal gamepad-like controller for any 5.5-6.5 android phone with an external accumulator fitted inside.
DISPLAY SIZES COMPARED
Green = Switch
Blue = ROG Phone II
ACTUAL PHYSICAL SIZES COMPARED
Green = Switch
Blue = ROG Phone II
Green = Switch
Blue = ROG Phone II
ACTUAL PHYSICAL SIZES COMPARED
Green = Switch
Blue = ROG Phone II
- CPU is nearly 3x as powerful
- GPU is ~56% more powerful
- 12GB RAM (vs. 2GB RAM)
- 512GB Storage (vs. 32GB Storage)
- 2.74x as many pixels; +65% greater pixel density
- 39% larger battery
The software library isn't nearly as strong, without emulation, but I addressed that in post #1128. It's definitely not going to sell well. It's a niche product. Companies have already tried selling the accessory you describe, and none of the various ideas have sold well. It's all a niche in Android gaming when targeting less casual users.


