Here's what I don't get. Or maybe, I think I get it, but I don't like it.
The report being submitted is in itself being called a victory or defeat (as long as we're clear that it was wholly unreasonable that he would indict Trump). There is no context here at all, and not even text, so the conclusion we have to draw is that the investigation itself was the threat. That would mean the Trump defenders were defending from the investigation and not from its findings. Without going into the absolute moral and patriotic dysfunction of such a position, anybody in the anti-Trump camp who is feeling bad that the investigation is over has either positioned himself against the gratification of the Trump defenders (a losing move every time), or has bought into the idea that the investigation was something to be held over the administration, rather than an inquiry of national security and criminal justice (also a losing move).
Everybody who feels pulled in one of those directions is being influenced into doing something unpatriotic, intellectually dishonest, against the principles of law and order and due process, and is generally behaving in a fundamentally un-American way. This is a rare "both sides" opinion from me, but I see this reaction as a critical failure by many people. I suspect this is more prevalent on the Internet than in brick-and-mortar life, but it's also in line with rise in tribalism in our culture that is playing out in real life. It's not good. This is a time for objectivity.