Gagging for it (SCO Thread v. 29) Update Mueller Report Released

Status
Not open for further replies.
ocean size said:
lol.
I'm responding to @bobgeese unsolicited "what about hillary" question to me. I guess pointing out bob's question is retarded is a meltdown.
Click to expand...


I don’t think pointing out that democrats cried for two years about Russian Collusion, while actually being guilty of Russian Collusion is “retarded”.

It’s a fact.
And
It’s hilarious.
 
HereticBD said:
What really blows me away about some of these pundits, is that they truly buy into their own bullshit. I figure most are just paying the bills, and doing what the network wants, but with people like Maddow, you can tell she's all in. It's not a TV persona. That's her.
Click to expand...



Sad!
 
JamesRussler said:
How bout this one?

tenor.gif
Click to expand...

Better.

Though a bit dangerous with a shovel that could knock you the fuck out if you're not careful. <Lmaoo>
 
bobgeese said:
LOLOLOLOLOLLLLL, butthurt mods deleting posts already..


<36>


I’ll just write out the meme that is the left right now.

Say the line shill

But... but... sdny...

LOLOLOLOLOLLLLL

Please, embarrass yourselves some more. This is perfect.
Click to expand...

Let's vote on which mod.
 
Why are you guys so sure that muellers report won’t hit trump hard?

It doesn’t have to be hard enough to impeach him, only hard enough to make his voters think twice about voting for him
 
Lead said:
Dude, I have her show in my podcast queue. 90% of her coverage the past two years has been this. She is probably going to move on to the NY state stuff but I’m sure she will be pissed for awhile about all this.
Click to expand...
Here's what I don't get. Or maybe, I think I get it, but I don't like it.

The report being submitted is in itself being called a victory or defeat (as long as we're clear that it was wholly unreasonable that he would indict Trump). There is no context here at all, and not even text, so the conclusion we have to draw is that the investigation itself was the threat. That would mean the Trump defenders were defending from the investigation and not from its findings. Without going into the absolute moral and patriotic dysfunction of such a position, anybody in the anti-Trump camp who is feeling bad that the investigation is over has either positioned himself against the gratification of the Trump defenders (a losing move every time), or has bought into the idea that the investigation was something to be held over the administration, rather than an inquiry of national security and criminal justice (also a losing move).

Everybody who feels pulled in one of those directions is being influenced into doing something unpatriotic, intellectually dishonest, against the principles of law and order and due process, and is generally behaving in a fundamentally un-American way. This is a rare "both sides" opinion from me, but I see this reaction as a critical failure by many people. I suspect this is more prevalent on the Internet than in brick-and-mortar life, but it's also in line with rise in tribalism in our culture that is playing out in real life. It's not good. This is a time for objectivity.
 
OverPressure said:
LOL
I think @glenwo2 is right.
Unfortunately, Twitter is too useful for even a POTUS to avoid entirely.
Click to expand...

Yep.

Trump has provided a blueprint.

It would've been one thing if he had lost the election.

But since he won it while using Twitter, you can count on future Candidates to utilize Social Media as well.

Not to the extent that Trump does, of course...but considerable use of Twitter will more than likely happen.
 
Last edited:
Gladiator24 said:
Why are you guys so sure that muellers report won’t hit trump hard?

It doesn’t have to be hard enough to impeach him, only hard enough to make his voters think twice about voting for him
Click to expand...



<36>



That’s not gonna happen. The democrats are voting to let illegals vote, and are running on reparations and at least Beto wants to tear down our border security.


Your party is cancer bro, get away while you still can.
 
glenwo2 said:
Yep.

Trump has provided a blueprint.

It would've been one thing if he had lost the election.

But since he won it while using Twitter, you can count on future Candidates to utilize Social Media as well.

Not to the extent that Trump does, of course...but considerably use of Twitter will more than likely happen.
Click to expand...

Social media made it harder for the media to control the narrative. They were always the mouthpiece for politicians, but Trump really changed the game.
 
JamesRussler said:
Listen to this Pansy Swalwell crying!
You can see him tear up on air around 2:04-2:30! Listen to that voice crack!


"We'll fight and we'll win, Wolf."
Foo you won't do shit!
LOL! Oh man Democrats are really broken up over this. What a disaster!
Click to expand...


OMG!

THIS IS SO FUCKING SATISFYING TO SEE THAT "Oh! I'm going to avoid getting a coffee" CUCK Be this way.
 
Fawlty said:
Here's what I don't get. Or maybe, I think I get it, but I don't like it.

The report being submitted is in itself being called a victory or defeat (as long as we're clear that it was wholly unreasonable that he would indict Trump). There is no context here at all, and not even text, so the conclusion we have to draw is that the investigation itself was the threat. That would mean the Trump defenders were defending from the investigation and not from its findings. Without going into the absolute moral and patriotic dysfunction of such a position, anybody in the anti-Trump camp who is feeling bad that the investigation is over has either positioned himself against the gratification of the Trump defenders (a losing move every time), or has bought into the idea that the investigation was something to be held over the administration, rather than an inquiry of national security and criminal justice (also a losing move).

Everybody who feels pulled in one of those directions is being influenced into doing something unpatriotic, intellectually dishonest, against the principles of law and order and due process, and is generally behaving in a fundamentally un-American way. This is a rare "both sides" opinion from me, but I see this reaction as a critical failure by many people. I suspect this is more prevalent on the Internet than in brick-and-mortar life, but it's also in line with rise in tribalism in our culture that is playing out in real life. It's not good. This is a time for objectivity.
Click to expand...



Back in reality, if trump was in trouble for Russian Collusion, surely, SURELY someone would have been charged with something to do with Russia.

<TheDonald>


There are no more indictments, it’s over. Meuller flopped.
 
bobgeese said:
I don’t think pointing out that democrats cried for two years about Russian Collusion, while actually being guilty of Russian Collusion is “retarded”.

It’s a fact.
And
It’s hilarious.
Click to expand...
But only if your bar for collusion is so low it includes normal and legal market activities including those by sub-sub-subcontractors. I think that's a lower bar for collusion than has ever been used by any of the liberals here that were calling for Trump's head the whole time so you are kinda forcing the hilarity.
 
bobgeese said:
Back in reality, if trump was in trouble for Russian Collusion, surely, SURELY someone would have been charged with something to do with Russia.

<TheDonald>


There are no more indictments, it’s over. Meuller flopped.
Click to expand...
Pearls before swine, gets me every time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,281,156
Messages
58,344,462
Members
176,009
Latest member
wmmaf

Share this page

Back
Top