Elections GA already did two audits!!! RHEEEEE

[Strychnine]

https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-b...on-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/

A part of the article you posted that just screams out at me...

"Digital ballot images made public under Georgia’s new voting law show nearly 200 ballots — including one for West — that election officials initially scanned two times last fall before a recount. There’s no indication any vote for president was counted more than once in official results."

Guys... Don't give these grifters your money.. YOU need it.. They're already millionaires.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

There is so much proof in this thread. Proof that Trump cultists never learn their lesson. No matter how many THIS IS IT CT's fall apart on them they're always up for the next one. Truly a grifter like Trump's favorite type of person. Just an endless well of free money that will believe everything he says no matter what.

 

[Amerikuracana]

One, which was caught during the first recount. It was covered in the election audit thread and posted by @cottagecheesefan. At the time he posted it, it was a huge gigantic fraud claim that fell apart very fast.

I think they found some more, dude.

 

[Amerikuracana]

Bruh...

This is NOT it.

It's not even a start.

You're being played for donations of your hard earned dollars to be given to millionaires.

Who is asking me for donations?

 

[cottagecheesefan]

One, which was caught during the first recount. It was covered in the election audit thread and posted by @cottagecheesefan. At the time he posted it, it was a huge gigantic fraud claim that fell apart very fast.

what evidence are you referencing?

 

[Strychnine]

Who is asking me for donations?

That's Right, Fighting Back Hard
Against the Democrat hit jobs. I will beat all Charges.
WE NEED ALL FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS TO GET INVOLVED!

STAND WITH TRUMP | UNITE WITH YOUR FEARLESS PASSION

I Will Never Stop Fighting For You - Trump Donations

 

[Ophydian]

what evidence are you referencing?

The ballot recount in GA that happened months ago that showed incorrect tabulation for votes that was corrected and it changed the vote totals.

 

[Officer Rick]

 

[Ophydian]

I think they found some more, dude.

I’ve been digging through this and so far what I’ve found is that this isn’t new but old data that is being presented as new. That’s what lead me to say that this gives GA enough cover to issue a 3rd party audit. It’s the whole idea that if you flood media with enough plausibility it will give cover to officials to move forward. It’s a rouse designed to confuse.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

The ballot recount in GA that happened months ago that showed incorrect tabulation for votes that was corrected and it changed the vote totals.

but these fraudulent tally sheets are from that recount. Moreover, the recount has people testifying that there were obvious copies during the recount (potentially to make up the difference from running multiple batches through).

That is all now supported by what has been coming out.

So not sure what i posted that fell apart. In fact, if you watch the press conference from two days ago, they say that the audit they conducted has an almost 60% error rate when compared to the ballots that are now available.

Everything that has come out has only supported everything I have been saying lol

 

[Loiosh]

This thread.

 

[MicroBrew]

So about 200 ballots were double counted. That's not enough to sway the election. It was always said from the very start that no fraud has been found that would have made an impact. Meaning there was some fraud but not enough to matter. Every election is going to have some degree of fraud and errors.

There is no indication the double-counted ballots influenced the final total votes for either former President Donald Trump or President Joe Biden, though the duplicates would have given Biden 27 more votes if they were tabulated.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/brad-raffensperger-demands-firing-fulton-175200198.html

 

[cincymma79]

https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-b...on-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/

I mean this is what Ive been saying all along
“It’s Fulton failing to follow proper election protocols again,” said Carter Jones, an independent monitor of Fulton’s elections who found sloppy practices but no fraud. “Fulton is so poor at managing the actual process that if they had actually tried to rig the election, they would have bungled it and we would have found out.”

 

[cottagecheesefan]

So about 200 ballots were double counted. That's not enough to sway the election. It was always said from the very start that no fraud has been found that would have made an impact. Meaning there was some fraud but not enough to matter. Every election is going to have some degree of fraud and errors.

There is no indication the double-counted ballots influenced the final total votes for either former President Donald Trump or President Joe Biden, though the duplicates would have given Biden 27 more votes if they were tabulated.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/brad-raffensperger-demands-firing-fulton-175200198.html

? did the author of that article actuallylook at the evidence or watch the press conference?

Even in the SOS's own audit results, it shows about 1500 votes that were actually triple counted, and that was a limited audit.

Now that the ballot images are out, they already have thousands, and are finding more lol









and it goes on lol

 

[cottagecheesefan]

I mean this is what Ive been saying all along
“It’s Fulton failing to follow proper election protocols again,” said Carter Jones, an independent monitor of Fulton’s elections who found sloppy practices but no fraud. “Fulton is so poor at managing the actual process that if they had actually tried to rig the election, they would have bungled it and we would have found out.”

they did find out in a risk-limiting audit by the SOS's office, which already showed a bunch of errors, they just did not investigate further

 

[cincymma79]

they did find out in a risk-limiting audit by the SOS's office, which already showed a bunch of errors, they just did not investigate further

Yeah but not fraud per se just mass incompetence

 

[cottagecheesefan]

Yeah but not fraud per se just mass incompetence

well, just the tally sheets they released are 100% fraud and they plan on going back to SOS's office to follow up. Someone clearly wrote 100-0, 150-0, 200-0, multiple times and signed their name. Signature was redacted, but that is fraud of 1000 ballots there, at least.

Also in the court filings, they expected these duplicated ballots, as evident from the fulton county video, so telling everyone to leave, then running batches that are heavily skewed to Biden is fraud, which is now proven by the ballot images, which was aquired through said court case.

 

[MicroBrew]

? did the author of that article actuallylook at the evidence or watch the press conference?

Even in the SOS's own audit results, it shows about 1500 votes that were actually triple counted, and that was a limited audit.

Now that the ballot images are out, they already have thousands, and are finding more lol









and it goes on lol

The article is from the Washington Examiner, a rightwing paper. They would not try to downplay the number of double counted votes. Could just be that your information is more current.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

well, just the tally sheets they released are 100% fraud and they plan on going back to SOS's office to follow up. Someone clearly wrote 100-0, 150-0, 200-0, multiple times and signed their name. Signature was redacted, but that is fraud of 1000 ballots there, at least.

Also in the court filings, they expected these duplicated ballots, as evident from the fulton county video, so telling everyone to leave, then running batches that are heavily skewed to Biden is fraud, which is now proven by the ballot images, which was aquired through said court case.

oh really? nice! so whats the docket number to a court filing where any type of fraud was alleged?

dont worry, its coming one of these days, just not today right?

Someone clearly wrote 100-0, 150-0, 200-0, multiple times and signed their name. Signature was redacted, but that is fraud of 1000 ballots there, at least.

oh yeah, and who is this "someone"? mickey mouse, the ghosts of hugo chavez and mussolini? i mean usually when they catch people for fraud, they are able to attach a name behind it. does this "someone" have a name? doesnt matter right? its not a serious enough crime to want anybody put in prison over it. it could be anyone! but you know theyll never be able to attach a name behind it and ever bother to do anything about it through the justice system, because this is super legit and all and nobody is lying to you.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

The article is from the Washington Examiner, a rightwing paper. They would not try to downplay the number of double counted votes. Could just be that your information is more current.

my info is from the auditor working with the plaintiff in the court case.

the article is from yahoo, which references the Examiner.

But the examiner article, gets their story from Atlanta Journal (which is heavily liberal)

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/absentee-ballots-double-counted-fulton-county

"As reported by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, there is no indication the double-counted ballots influenced the final total votes for either former President Donald Trump or President Joe Biden, though the duplicates would have given Biden 27 more votes if they were tabulated."

Lol, just in this particular reporting, that is an article referencing another article, referencing another news article. Why don't they reference a primary source?

You guys need to critically think more when finding sources, rather than just saying it may be out dated. lol