Elections GA already did two audits!!! RHEEEEE

Republicans want to act like every single instance of something is reason to overturn the election but the system was never funded or run to catch every single possible error. It was setup to run correctly enough so that the proper person was put into office.

The sentence above is the issue. There is no reason an election should be run well enough to factor in errors and get the right person in office. There shouldn't be a single error in 2021. I don't think the election should be over turned, but I think your election system is broken and should be reformed. The fact that we are still discussing this and people have valid points on both sides is pretty nuts. There isn't a valid argument that this was a weird election. Heaps of rules were changed late due to the pandemic. I personally think voter ID and no mass mail in votes is a pretty reasonable request. If you genuinely don't believe that more votes were counted in error as a result of this election on both sides I think you are pretty naïve. I will call it right now that there will be a switch back in the Senate for Republicans and we will hear claims of voter fraud and election issues from Democrats.

The phrase there was no significant voter fraud to change the election results isn't good enough. It should be there was no election fraud because we have processes that cover those issues because we live in a first world country. Something as basic as ID's and requesting mail in votes is a good start.

You have never worked with large systems, spread over large areas, with large silo'd groups. This idea that there should be no error is unattainable and to actually try for that would be a huge waste of money. There wasn't one state where 0.1% error would have made a difference. It is nice to say that there should be no error but that shouldn't even be a real goal. The goal is the error shouldn't affect the election, which it never has. Everyone wants to claim that the election was rigged because of xyz but I don't think most really has an idea of what 1 out 1000 fraudulent votes looks like. 1 out of 1000 votes would be so obvious and massive that it would be impossible to hide and even at that amount, it wouldn't have swayed the end result.

If you wanted to tighten up the election, the easiest way to do it would be just to focus on the 4 or 5 states from the previous election that were close. All the other states are lopsided enough that it is unlikely any fraud could affect the result.
 
Last edited:
Oh shit! Hopefully he doesn't lose it like he did with Hunter's hard drive.
Are you talking about the papers fedex or ups lost when he mailed them?
 
Lots of good points made here, I would like to add the lots of republicans also believed the Russian lie and didn’t run for reelection in the house handing over control to the dems where they proceeded to run interference for the FBI and boggle Trump down with investigations that had no merit.


 
What was I telling you about that porn addiction?
You're probably interested in Donald sexually too. Dat white grievance.

477.jpg
 
Trumpanzes can't stop embarrassing themselves

You don't understand. This is the one that's gonna prove EVERYTHING. Don't worry about Lin Wood and Sidney Powell being sanctioned for bringing frivolous lawsuits about election fraud. It's all part of the plan.
 
You have never worked with large systems, spread over large areas, with large silo'd groups. This idea that there should be no error is unattainable and to actually try for that would be a huge waste of money. There wasn't one state where 0.1% error would have made a difference. It is nice to say that there should be no error but that shouldn't even be a real goal. The goal is the error shouldn't affect the election, which it never has. Everyone wants to claim that the election was rigged because of xyz but I don't think most really has an idea of what 1 out 1000 fraudulent votes looks like. 1 out of 1000 votes would be so obvious and massive that it would be impossible to hide and even at that amount, it wouldn't have swayed the end result.

If you wanted to tighten up the election, the easiest way to do it would be just to focus on the 4 or 5 states from the previous election that were close. All the other states are lopsided enough that it is unlikely any fraud could affect the result.

It's the election for who is running the country. It's worth being accurate. It's not a waste of money at all. We will here all this same election fraud crap at the next election regardless of who wins. One Democrat candidate was contesting the election based off ineligible votes not being counted. That race was decided by less than 10 votes.
https://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article250115294.html Last time it was Russian bots, this time it was "insert your favourite conspiracy theory" next election it will be something else.

I don't actually think it would be too hard to fix the election.
1.All eligible people are enrolled to vote. You must vote or you receive a small fine. If you don't like a candidate just draw a dick on your ballot to void your vote.
(Fixes the issues of illegal voters and makes a consistent amount of votes be tallied based of population.)
2.ID's are produced at the polls or designated election offices to request mail in absentee votes. No mass mail in votes sent out, no collection by party agents.
(Proves people are actually who they are and voted for who they did)
3.Election workers are vetted, paid for their time and everything can be viewed from a gallery type area by local state government who can ensure the process is correctly done.(The hardest part because money and time)
4. Early voting with all of the above rules,2-4 week period to cast your vote. Everyone can make time to get an in person vote or mail in vote during that time.

This fixes voter suppression, because everyone must vote. It fixes ID being an issue and gives people who can't make the polls plenty of time to vote. Election workers are vetted and paid, leading to more efficient counting and procedures.

I just stole some of Australia's processes to be honest, but it seems to work here with our smaller population. I could compare compulsory voting with obama care or wone of those type executive orders, but I know it would never happen so I won't waste the time arguing the point. I used to hate compulsory voting, but with absentee request it's pretty good to be honest.
 
Lots of good points made here, I would like to add the lots of republicans also believed the Russian lie and didn’t run for reelection in the house handing over control to the dems where they proceeded to run interference for the FBI and boggle Trump down with investigations that had no merit.



Look at Second Sight, whining about election fraud in July, while lecturing us about investigations that have no merit.<Lmaoo>

It's only a little while longer now until they take him away in a straight jacket. I imagine he'll be shouting something about how liberals have "TDS" as they place him in the padded room in the psych ward.
 
Look at Second Sight, whining about election fraud in July, while lecturing us about investigations that have no merit.<Lmaoo>

It's only a little while longer now until they take him away in a straight jacket. I imagine he'll be shouting something about how liberals have "TDS" as they place him in the padded room in the psych ward.

these are the types of guys you always say hello to and invite them to office functions because they are most likely to go postal.
 
at first I was like "geez, some of these people genuinely need psychiatric help" but now I feel like it's probably better if they never get it. I hope this consumes them until their dying day and they spend the entirety of now until whenever stewing on this and getting madder and madder as the rest of the world laughs in their faces. They deserve so much worse but it will have to do
 
Lots of good points made here, I would like to add the lots of republicans also believed the Russian lie and didn’t run for reelection in the house handing over control to the dems where they proceeded to run interference for the FBI and boggle Trump down with investigations that had no merit.




Wait a minute. You actually think Jeff Flake and others didn't run for re-election because they believed Trump colluded with Russia and not that Trump was a gigantic piece of shit that didn't represent the Republican party? Holy god.

Trump is the RINO and not the other way around.

Guys, the Lincoln Project was started because they believed Trump colluded with Russia.
 
Digital evidence he mailed
just making sure, they said they lost the copies...package was open documents gone etc (until they found them)
Tucker had extra copies and said that from the start
 
Trumpanzes can't stop embarrassing themselves

Is it really unreasonable to expect there should be at least as many 2020 election audits in GA as there will be Poirier vs. McGregor fights??
 
Wait a minute. You actually think Jeff Flake and others didn't run for re-election because they believed Trump colluded with Russia and not that Trump was a gigantic piece of shit that didn't represent the Republican party? Holy god.

Guys, the Lincoln Project was started because they believed Trump colluded with Russia.
Jeff flake is a POS and he was a senator not a house member. there were close to 30 of the top of my head house members that didn't run for reelection, many because of so called Trump Russia collusion. It is much harder for an incumbent to lose an election than someone challenging them and these people just handed their seats over
 
It's the election for who is running the country. It's worth being accurate. It's not a waste of money at all. We will here all this same election fraud crap at the next election regardless of who wins. One Democrat candidate was contesting the election based off ineligible votes not being counted. That race was decided by less than 10 votes.
https://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article250115294.html Last time it was Russian bots, this time it was "insert your favourite conspiracy theory" next election it will be something else.

I don't actually think it would be too hard to fix the election.
1.All eligible people are enrolled to vote. You must vote or you receive a small fine. If you don't like a candidate just draw a dick on your ballot to void your vote.
(Fixes the issues of illegal voters and makes a consistent amount of votes be tallied based of population.)
2.ID's are produced at the polls or designated election offices to request mail in absentee votes. No mass mail in votes sent out, no collection by party agents.
(Proves people are actually who they are and voted for who they did)
3.Election workers are vetted, paid for their time and everything can be viewed from a gallery type area by local state government who can ensure the process is correctly done.(The hardest part because money and time)
4. Early voting with all of the above rules,2-4 week period to cast your vote. Everyone can make time to get an in person vote or mail in vote during that time.

This fixes voter suppression, because everyone must vote. It fixes ID being an issue and gives people who can't make the polls plenty of time to vote. Election workers are vetted and paid, leading to more efficient counting and procedures.

I just stole some of Australia's processes to be honest, but it seems to work here with our smaller population. I could compare compulsory voting with obama care or wone of those type executive orders, but I know it would never happen so I won't waste the time arguing the point. I used to hate compulsory voting, but with absentee request it's pretty good to be honest.

Sorry man but I am going to have to agree with @Prefect. No system is 100% perfect. Human error alone will cause the system to be off. You can't develop a system for human intentions. Most people develop a system to be good enough and then develop measures behind it (audits/hand counts) to verify the results if they go outside the expected outcome.
 
Jeff flake is a POS and he was a senator not a house member. there were close to 30 of the top of my head house members that didn't run for reelection, many because of so called Trump Russia collusion. It is much harder for an incumbent to lose an election than someone challenging them and these people just handed their seats over

Please oh god show your work here. I guess Paul Ryan believed Trump colluded with Russia? LOL

BTW, Since you still think its a HOAX here is something you failed to read because if you did it would destroy your entire ego.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...nate-trump-decimate-his-russia-hoax-narrative
 
adam shithead is going to come out with his proof any day now?

good grief you guys are tooled

Its the Senate Intel investigation. Serious question, can you comprehend everything you read? Do you suffer from dyslexia?
 
Back
Top