- Joined
- Jun 19, 2016
- Messages
- 3,192
- Reaction score
- 1
And which had the better career?
Noobs won't get it, but Rich was a killer.
I love Robbie, but he got gifts from the judges against both Hendricks and Condit.
Can't be a killer in pink shorts. Vitor did a full reboot on his entire brainNoobs won't get it, but Rich was a killer.
I love Robbie, but he got gifts from the judges against both Hendricks and Condit.
Can't be a killer in pink shorts. Vitor did a full reboot on his entire brain
Those mistakes still resonate on the ledger. I would say Lawler. It's not a blowout though. Rich was as close to elite as you could get at the time. Andy was just operating in the matrix at the time.
Condit and Rory < wand and ChuckI think it's Lawler. Condit and MacDonald > Loiseau and Quarry, even considering the different eras they fought in.
I grew up in the 80s so I got no problem with dudes in pink.
I just loved how Rich was a legit finisher. And if he didn't finish, he often got finished, because he was an attack-minded fighter.
I don't know the numbers precisely, but he must have gone at least 2:1 finishes:decisions. When Ace walked to the Octagon you knew you were in for a treat.
Same with Robbie of course. What kind of sadist would make us choose between these two anyway?
Condit and Rory < wand and Chuck
i dont the gif but i love it!
The fuck does that matter?I won't argue, but those weren't title defenses.