Media Francis looking natty af back in 2013

It is true too, there IQ differences, BUT IQ is not the only factor to measure for intelligence, it is just one way to measure intelligence. We dont really know how to measure intelligence overall. But if u talk about only IQ, there are differences, just like there are differences in our metabolic system.

So differences are not strictly from the neck down?
 
This would make sense if he showed any actual predispozition to being muscular as a young adult, he didnt, his natrual genetics are very much of a lanky athletic built guy. Believe it or not, if you go to a powerlifting meet and see a bunch of jacked up white dudes or watch strongest man comps which is dominated by white guys... It doesnt mean that most white people are 300lbs strong men just like a competition of jacked black wrestlers doeant mean its a representation of the average west african male.
This is the argument people make when a couple fighter from a country that hasn't been featured much start having success. "Damn! These Estonian fighters are straight fire! We need more of them!". As if it's purely because they are from whatever country instead of the training and junk.
 
and I have dubs ...

Lol... and now magically my whole post exposing TS's racist statement and all his silly points about PEDs has been deleted, yet you can still read his original racist post under someone else's quote <mma3>{<huh}
 
Last edited:
Lol... and now magically my whole post exposing TS's racist statement and all his silly points about PEDs has been deleted, yet you can still read the original post under someone else's quote <mma3>{<huh}

I always find that kinda funny, history revision is amusing when altered realities leak thru...
 
Lol... and now magically my whole post exposing TS's racist statement and all his silly points about PEDs has been deleted, yet you can still read the original post under someone else's quote <mma3>{<huh}
mods are crazy
 
strength is not like muscle mass ...

caucasian and mongoloïd are stronger % to their mass, west africans have more muscle mass and usually are more explosive ( most of the sprinter are west africans of origin ).

There are some difference between race, u should understand it, and accept it. Most of the marathon winner are east african, it is life bro. Same here, west african are on average jacker than the usual caucasian man. Ngannou still looks big to me ( relative to his height ) in the picture u showed. Plus look at his joints thickness, he clearly is a genetic freak. Just like their are some freak in IQ or some shits, there are in shape, deal with it.
I found a paper on it: https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/34/5/391


East African running dominance: what is behind it?

Introduction
East African middle and long distance runners are currently the dominant force in athletics. As well as dominating the track events at the last several Olympic Games, they are also dominant on the American and European road racing circuit and world cross country events. Although many physiological and anatomical factors have been proposed to explain East African dominance, research into these variables has not yet revealed any definitive advantage for the African. Traditional social and cultural factors have often been described as “advantageous”, and, although these factors may be to a greater or lesser extent involved in the East African dominance, it is probable that both the African and caucasian psychology or “mindset” are now additional important factors in maintaining that dominance. Like Scandinavian distance runners in the early 20th century, who won 28 of 36 possible Olympic medals over 5000 and 10 000 m, the East Africans have developed an aura of invincibility, both in their own minds and the minds of their caucasian opponents. Caucasians world wide are searching for proof of the physical advantage of the East Africans while handing them on a platter a psychological advantage which, until removed, will perpetuate the current state.


Possible reasons for East African dominance
Many factors have been described to explain both the dominance of East African middle and long distance runners and West African sprinters. Many of these have been disproved many times but are so fixed in folklore that they continue to be touted as possible causes of success. Despite being shown to be unsubstantiated in the 1930s,1 Sir Roger Bannister, in a speech delivered to the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1995, suggested that factors such as heel bone length, subcutaneous fat, and differences in Achilles tendon length may explain the advantages that West African athletes appear to have.1,2 Proposed factors involved in the success of East African athletes include environmental, genetic endowment, and social development,3 while the psychological make up of the East African is rarely considered.
 
I found a paper on it: https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/34/5/391


East African running dominance: what is behind it?

Introduction
East African middle and long distance runners are currently the dominant force in athletics. As well as dominating the track events at the last several Olympic Games, they are also dominant on the American and European road racing circuit and world cross country events. Although many physiological and anatomical factors have been proposed to explain East African dominance, research into these variables has not yet revealed any definitive advantage for the African. Traditional social and cultural factors have often been described as “advantageous”, and, although these factors may be to a greater or lesser extent involved in the East African dominance, it is probable that both the African and caucasian psychology or “mindset” are now additional important factors in maintaining that dominance. Like Scandinavian distance runners in the early 20th century, who won 28 of 36 possible Olympic medals over 5000 and 10 000 m, the East Africans have developed an aura of invincibility, both in their own minds and the minds of their caucasian opponents. Caucasians world wide are searching for proof of the physical advantage of the East Africans while handing them on a platter a psychological advantage which, until removed, will perpetuate the current state.


Possible reasons for East African dominance
Many factors have been described to explain both the dominance of East African middle and long distance runners and West African sprinters. Many of these have been disproved many times but are so fixed in folklore that they continue to be touted as possible causes of success. Despite being shown to be unsubstantiated in the 1930s,1 Sir Roger Bannister, in a speech delivered to the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1995, suggested that factors such as heel bone length, subcutaneous fat, and differences in Achilles tendon length may explain the advantages that West African athletes appear to have.1,2 Proposed factors involved in the success of East African athletes include environmental, genetic endowment, and social development,3 while the psychological make up of the East African is rarely considered.
very interesting, thank u, hopefully the mods won't delete ur comment.
 


Interesting video :

- the dude as a child was as effective as 2 men in the sand mine
- he was already a heavyweight at 22 years old
- his fathers was a famous street fighter and black belt in karate
- there are some footage of just regular workers jacked as much as UFC fighters ...
 
Back
Top