I'll take your word for it. But the Jungian types are based on a personality model that doesn't get much traction anymore.
I'm INTJ.
For me it was INFJ. The description here, minus all the flattery, seemed to describe me pretty well in general terms, http://www.16personalities.com/infj-personality
INFJ are one of the more extroverted introverts, and can often pass as introverts.
Where do you get your energy? That is what it comes down to. I like to socialize, and talk to people. But I have to "recharge" at home. Interaction drains me. Where it lifts up others. I always need a significant amount of alone time. ENFJ is basically like the nicest type. INFJ is more introverted. MLK could be an ENFJ, but Gandhi an INFJ. Bin Laden an INFJ too. INFJ also have a mystical side to them. Like Plato. GAndhi, Hitler, Ayatollah Khomeini, these guys were all mystical figures and cult leaders.
You skipped me Bones.
I have been diagnosed with INTP-itis
INFP Felt all to accurate
Estp
Checking this stuff again and I am a typical INTP. It's scary how well that explains me, as if someone got inside my head.
ISFP
although I feel I'm not incredibly artistic, but the other traits are pretty spot on
Got INTJ, no surprise.
I am the 1-2%
Isfj
Abstract theory and purely academic work that will never see the light of real use hold little interest for ISTPs.
fit me really well, I tend to stay grounded and skeptical.Think about the past or the present, Trust traditions and experience
INTP is one of the more intellectual types. They are philosophers. They are the arch enemy of the INTJ. INTJ is the scientist. INTP is more contemplative, INTJ is more no nonsense and scientific.
Not really. I would think you are a INFP, ISFP, or INFJ actually I don't know if you are an extrovert or introvert even. But I would put you as a feeler.
A lot of people don't want to admit they judge things by feeling instead of thinking. Especially males. I didn't want to accept it at first either.
I've read that as "system builders" in past interpretations.
I'm philosophical on the surface, but fundamentally scientific. Actually I see the one as a progression towards the other.
You can see famous people who share your type here, and it points out their justification.
http://www.celebritytypes.com/<snip>
What did you mean when you said, finally another one, when you tested INFP and I said INFJ initially?
I took the INFP vs INFJ test and it resulted in what I expected. I am about equal amounts of both. I have always split right down the middle of personality tests like that.
Enfp
They say that most INFJ's are actually INFP's
Good, straight up people. Superman is probably an ISFJ. They are somewhat similar to me. You're a protector type. You look after people.
My problem with the test is that I find I fit into parts of both subcategories of each of the choices
I can agree with that last portion, but i'd say about 90% of the time I look at things from a "think" instead of a feel. Actually, to kind of a strange disadvantage. I've said to two people, women of course, in the past couple of months "You hurt my feelings", and good god, that's was so much more powerful than telling them how wrong what they said was. It occured to me just how rare that is for me, both the feeling and the way I expressed it.
Further reading into it, I do see some things that I don't agree with, especially in the relationship section. I treat them very differently.
I wish there were a middleground of extra and intro; I love to be around people, but the people I'm around mostly like to sit around and talk instead of be in a big crowd. I don't mind either.