I'm defining politics at its most basic level: Who gets what, when, where, and how. Hence marriage and abortion are political issues since the government has to touch them in some capacity.I said nothing about marriage. And abortion is a medical issue.
I think it's you that's not getting my point. These issues (again, not talking about marriage) need not be political but they became political either for partisan gain or because peoples' rights needed protecting from attackers.
Please see my edit. I'm not disagreeing with you; I'm saying it's not necessary. Also, marriage and abortion are not at all the same for the purposes of this particular discussion. It's a false equivalency and (for the second time) I never mentioned marriage so please stop bringing it up.I'm defining politics at its most basic level: Who gets what, when, where, and how. Hence marriage and abortion are political issues since the government has to touch them in some capacity.
Yeah, that's what I mean by touching the government. Under that definition, choosing whether streets should be numbered or lettered is political.Please see my edit. I'm not disagreeing with you; I'm saying it's not necessary. Also, marriage and abortion are not at all the same for the purposes of this particular discussion. It's a false equivalency and (for the second time) I never mentioned marriage so please stop bringing it up.
Separation of state and church doesn't mean it's forbidden to have religious schools. It's forbidden for the state to mandate any kind of religion in schools. Big difference.
Double yellows already?what's your problem?
Jesus is brought up in the first four commandments according to “the trinity” in Christian doctrine. (See: John 1:1)The 10 commandments don't "bring Jesus up" because they're older than Jesus and already are part of "Jewish scripture".
Turning public schools into taxpayer-funded religious schools is part of a nationwide Christian Nationalist assault on church-state separation and that should not be allowed.
If we allow state governments to basically sponsor a state religion, and hence, go against the constitution? Where does it stop then? The 1st amendment? The 2nd? Removing the right of women to vote if that is indeed a religious view held by a majority of their constituents?
It’s literally a mandate.@Barteh said:
Separation of state and church doesn't mean it's forbidden to have religious schools. It's forbidden for the state to mandate any kind of religion in schools. Big difference.
Listen to what the very Christian politicians have said about the legislation and why they passed it.If the state funds Islamic schools, Jewish school and other types of religious schools also, I'd be fine with it. If they fund only Christian schools or show obvious preference it definitely goes against the separation of church and state, I'd be against that.
Jesus is brought up in the first four commandments according to “the trinity” in Christian doctrine. (See: John 1:1)
If the state funds Islamic schools, Jewish school and other types of religious schools also, I'd be fine with it. If they fund only Christian schools or show obvious preference it definitely goes against the separation of church and state, I'd be against that.
And in other pro-theocracy news, Tennessee just made a Bible an official "State Book"
![]()
Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signs bill making the Aitken Bible an official state book
The legislation makes the Aitken Bible, the first printed in the U.S. during the Revolutionary War, and nine other works official state books.eu.tennessean.com
Thats cool but we are talking about public schools being turned into Christian schools.
It is wrong to force the Christian faith on people with other/no faiths. If this thing survive the judicial review
then The Satanic Bible should be hung on the wall as well. Freedom of religion means you include all beliefs. So the Eight Fold Path, laws of Hinduism, Wiccan law and a statue of Molech while we're at it. All belief systems need to be represented.
Freedom of religion doesn't mean you should force in all beliefs. It means people should be free to practice whatever religion they want to.
Freedom of religion doesn't mean you should force in all beliefs. It means people should be free to practice whatever religion they want to.
The people who passed this legislation were Christian’s. The Ten Commandments are Christian and from judiasm. Christian’s believe Jesus was god and the Holy Spirit all at the same time.You seem to be confused about what is being displayed.
The author of the bill itself apparently said she wanted kids to look at this and see god's law lmaoThe people who passed this legislation were Christian’s. The Ten Commandments are Christian and from judiasm. Christian’s believe Jesus was god and the Holy Spirit all at the same time.
Thanks for coming To my Ted talk.
The author of the bill itself apparently said she wanted kids to look at this and see god's law lmao