- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
- Messages
- 15,112
- Reaction score
- 0
See the updated thread title:It's not? This thread is 48 pages long and I don't have time to read the whole thing - what did I miss?
A Leaked Democratic Response to Nunes Memo (But Not “the Memo”)
See the updated thread title:It's not? This thread is 48 pages long and I don't have time to read the whole thing - what did I miss?
The guy is clueless. He just posts BS constantly.The leaked Democratic memo... which isn't actually the leaked Democratic memo lol
It's not? This thread is 48 pages long and I don't have time to read the whole thing - what did I miss?
The guy is literally one of the best posters who consistently posts relevant information and flames no one. You show your true colors more and moreHe's being eaten alive by his own tribalism
The guy is clueless. He just posts BS constantly.
See the updated thread title:
A Leaked Democratic Response to Nunes Memo (But Not “the Memo”)
Are you for real?
Yes, I'm for real. I don't have time to read every thread in its entirety. So if I missed something, I'll ask. Why that makes you salty is beyond me.
You attacked the guy informing people
Troll on
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/3...o-does-not-discredit-mueller-probe-in-any-wayhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.po...owdy-blumenthal-steele-dossier-clinton-395929
It's all starting to come together
I didn't attack him. I stated information from the leaked document related to what they were discussing. He corrected me about something I had wrong.
You really are super sensitive about shit these days. Even shit that doesn't have anything to do with you. You must have your outrage meter set to the highest level. Dial that shit back or the stress is going to kill you, lol.
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/3...o-does-not-discredit-mueller-probe-in-any-way
Seems like Gowdy is playing both sides. He said a day earlier the memo does not discredit the probe. I guess the GOP told him how dare he be honest and better toe the party line.
He's still saying it doesn't discredit it. He's just telling the truth on who fed info to Steele.
IMO this is gonna blow up. And some of the MSM will have to report on what really happened. At that point public opinion will turn
Other texts show more examples of the officials' opposition to Trump.
On Election Day 2016, Strzok wrote, "OMG THIS IS F***ING TERRIFYING." Page replied, "Omg, I am so depressed." Later that month, on Nov. 13, 2016, Page wrote, "I bought all the president's men. Figure I need to brush up on watergate."
The next day, Nov. 14, 2016, Page wrote, “God, being here makes me angry. Lots of high fallutin’ national security talk. Meanwhile we have OUR task ahead of us.”
Page’s meaning here is unclear, but according to the Senate report, coupled with Strzok’s Aug. 15 text about an “insurance policy,” further investigation is warranted to find out what actions the two may have taken.
The last text is from Page to Strzok, and comes on June 23, 2017, when she wrote, "Please don't ever text me again."
Lisa Page: "POTUS wants to know everything we're doing."
New text messages have been released showing Peter Strzok and Lisa Page expressing serious concern over their prior text messages, and that they were reporting back to "POTUS" despite Obama's previous claim that he was in the dark on the whole thing. Obama's legal counsel has probably advised him to stay quite, which is why we have not heard from him in quite a while.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nd-page-uncovered-lead-to-more-questions.html
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nd-page-uncovered-lead-to-more-questions.html
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/library
I hope all three of them get prosecuted.
The sad thing is that the left-wing posters in here, and the millions of lemmings that voted for Hillary, will try to dismiss this and any other incriminating evidence that is released as a "nothing burger." These people are lost.
New text messages have been released showing Peter Strzok and Lisa Page expressing serious concern over their prior text messages, and that they were reporting back to "POTUS" despite Obama's previous claim that he was in the dark on the whole thing. Obama's legal counsel has probably advised him to stay quite, which is why we have not heard from him in quite a while.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nd-page-uncovered-lead-to-more-questions.html
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nd-page-uncovered-lead-to-more-questions.html
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/library
I hope all three of them get prosecuted.
The sad thing is that the left-wing posters in here, and the millions of lemmings that voted for Hillary, will try to dismiss this and any other incriminating evidence that is released as a "nothing burger." These people are lost.
It's already been debunked, Simple Jack.
Members of the pro-Trump media acted like they hit the goldmine on Wednesday morning. Led by Fox News, these outlets went into a frenzy over what they presented as an explosive story that not only cast former President Obama and Hillary Clinton in a negative light, but simultaneously helped vindicate claims then-candidate Donald Trump made about the investigation into Clinton's private email server being "rigged."
http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/07/med...text-message-clinton-investigation/index.html