Crime Ferris Mueller's Election Off (Mueller thread v. 24)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, his supporters can just wave it off as no big deal. But everyone in every other country hears, Trump is complicit in a crime. Cheers to the "I don't care what other countries think" crowd.
 
So is there proof trump committed felonies or has it not actually been presented to any of the circle jerkers in here claiming it is so yet?
Cohen has entered a guilty plea and during his elocution, said it was under the direction of Trump. Leaving it to the lawyers around here to provide the appropriate Latin term. @Quipling, @Trotsky @ who the fuck am I forgetting...
 
So what happens next exactly? They have proof Trump committed felonies. What’s the next step?
They will eventually present all info to Congress and the Senate. If the will is there he is impeached at both levels.

It the will is not there to do it politically they can sit and wait if he loses 2020 and go after him criminally then or even hold it until after 2024 and go after him criminally then. There is no statute of limitations on those charges.
 
Where are Glen, Waiguren and all the other whores? Are they in a home right now, talking about Dred Scott and Hilary?
Rapidly coming thru the Trumptard websites looking for any defense talking points possible.

If they find nothing expect a lot of whataboutHillary.
 
Assuming he had knowledge of the tower meeting he's guilty of conspiracy to commit election fraud/ some sort of cyber crime both felonies . The Mueller indictments have started to piece together the conspiracy of coordinating Wikileaks/Russia to hack DNC emails and disseminate them at opportunistic times

Where is the conspiracy to commit election fraud? Which part is the fraud? I’m not following. And where is the evidence? I see the russia link there but doesn’t seem like collusion. People find dirt on each other. That’s not a crime so it can’t be that.
 
Before the evidence is presented, always the best time to demand evidence

I was legitimately just asking. Because I don’t know enough about it. Lol you sour fucks can’t ever be normal. Trump has driven you people insane.
 
Cohen has entered a guilty plea and during his elocution, said it was under the direction of Trump. Leaving it to the lawyers around here to provide the appropriate Latin term. @Quipling, @Trotsky @ who the fuck am I forgetting...

So the guilty lawyer facing prison time said someone else told him to do it to lessen his prison time. That’s not quite “proof” of anything yet. So outside of that is there some new “proof” from the last couple days anyone not watching the news for 48 hours missed?

I’ve been busy and all of sudden the circle jerk crew is tripping over themselves wanting to spout off about proof of felonies by trump this afternoon.
 
So the guilty lawyer facing prison time said someone else told him to do it to lessen his prison time. That’s not quite “proof” of anything yet. So outside of that is there some new “proof” from the last couple days anyone not watching the news for 48 hours missed?

I’ve been busy and all of sudden the circle jerk crew is tripping over themselves wanting to spout off about proof of felonies by trump this afternoon.

Exactly my thoughts. Cohen saying something doesn’t make it true. In fact he has proven to be a very dishonest witness. That’s why I am curious but the circle jerk crew are out in full force, and they will be disappointed when nothing comes of this. As usual.
 
So the guilty lawyer facing prison time said someone else told him to do it to lessen his prison time. That’s not quite “proof” of anything yet. So outside of that is there some new “proof” from the last couple days anyone not watching the news for 48 hours missed?

I’ve been busy and all of sudden the circle jerk crew is tripping over themselves wanting to spout off about proof of felonies by trump this afternoon.

Exactly my thoughts. Cohen saying something doesn’t make it true. In fact he has proven to be a very dishonest witness. That’s why I am curious but the circle jerk crew are out in full force, and they will be disappointed when nothing comes of this. As usual.

Today I learned from two top minds of Sherdog that a state department (working in conjunction with a special counsel of the FBI) filing court documents directly implicating the president of the United States in felonies actually carries no weight whatsoever and means no more than if they hadn't filed these documents at all. Furthermore, I learned that, as much as we all think this means something, this could easily go the other way and be one of the many embarrassing incidents in which prosecutors filed similar papers which turned out to have no proof whatsoever supporting them.

Thanks, top minds!
 
Today I learned from two top minds of Sherdog that a state department, working in conjunction with a special counsel of the FBI, filing court documents directly implicating the president of the United States in felonies, actually carries no weight whatsoever and means nothing more than if they hadn't filed these documents at all. Furthermore, I learned that, as much as we all think this means something, this could easily go the other way and be one of the many embarrassing incidents in which prosecutors filed similar papers which turned out to have no proof whatsoever supporting them.

Thanks, top minds!

Oh good, you have that proof of trump committing felonies you can show us.
 
Oh good, you have that proof of trump committing felonies you can show us.

Oh, good, you have proof (past incidents, anything) that suggests that charges of this magnitude could be filed without evidence to back them up. Certainly you're not just doubting these developments like a fucking moron would.
 
Today I learned from two top minds of Sherdog that a state department (working in conjunction with a special counsel of the FBI) filing court documents directly implicating the president of the United States in felonies actually carries no weight whatsoever and means no more than if they hadn't filed these documents at all. Furthermore, I learned that, as much as we all think this means something, this could easily go the other way and be one of the many embarrassing incidents in which prosecutors filed similar papers which turned out to have no proof whatsoever supporting them.

Thanks, top minds!

I wouldn’t exactly call Mueller and his team (who have many democrats and Hillary links) or the SDNY impartial against Trump.

That being said, nobody questioned them, legit just asked for an explanation on their reasoning and you all got so defensive lol.

It says volumes.
 
I wouldn’t exactly call Mueller and his team (who have many democrats and Hillary links) or the SDNY impartial against Trump.

That being said, nobody questioned them, legit just asked for an explanation on their reasoning and you all got so defensive lol.

It says volumes.

Yes, it says volumes that we treat you like an idiot for saying things that only idiots say when discussing the nature of the allegations against Trump.

What do you suppose it says?

And how do you think we'd treat you if you wandered in here saying the things that smart people say when analyzing the allegations against Trump?
 
Oh, good, you have proof (past incidents, anything) that suggests that charges of this magnitude could be filed without evidence to back them up. Certainly you're not just doubting these developments like a fucking moron would.

Trump was actually charged with felonies?
 
Trump was actually charged with felonies?

Many charges have been filed against Manafort and Cohen (and many others close to Trump and his operation).

You're saying that it is reasonable to believe today's papers, which directly implicate Trump in felonies, could be filed without proof. That is fucking stupid beyond description. Only the stupidest people on this forum would pretend that was true. Luckily, you can provide past examples of charges of this magnitude turning out to be completely unsubstantiated because you're not a fucking moron.... right?
 
Yes, it says volumes that we treat you like an idiot for saying things that only idiots say when discussing the nature of the allegations against Trump.

What do you suppose it says?

And how do you think we'd treat you if you wandered in here saying the things that smart people say when analyzing the allegations against Trump?

It says volumes about you because you’re acring like a rabid dumbass lol. Nothing will happen to Trump because at the moment there is no proof that he actually did anything with Russia. That’s just reality.
 
It says volumes about you because you’re acring like a rabid dumbass lol. Nothing will happen to Trump because at the moment there is no proof that he actually did anything with Russia. That’s just reality.

I can't imagine why you're being treated like an idiot troll. This must be a very confusing time for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top