• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Feminist protest against Warren Farrell

Women have equal rights. Plain and simple. Okay, let me clarify myself, there is no use for feminism in the U.S. It's needed in other parts of the world, but feminism here in the states only exists as an angry bitch club.
 
Feminism is self defeating becuase no matter how good women have it, it will never be enough.

There so much truth to the joke below it ain't funny:

A store that sells new husbands has opened in New York City , where a woman may go to choose a husband. Among the instructions at the entrance is a description of how the store operates:
You may visit this store ONLY ONCE! There are six floors and the value of the products increase as the shopper ascends the flights. The shopper may choose any item from a particular floor, or may choose to go up
to the next floor, but you cannot go back down except to exit the building!

So, a woman goes to the Husband Store to find a husband. On the first floor the sign on the door reads:

Floor 1 – These men Have Jobs
She is intrigued, but continues to the second floor, where the sign reads:

Floor 2 – These men Have Jobs and Love Kids.
‘That’s nice,’ she thinks, ‘but I want more.’
So she continues upward. The third floor sign reads:

Floor 3 – These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, and are Extremely Good Looking.
‘Wow,’ she thinks, but feels compelled to keep going.
She goes to the fourth floor and the sign reads:

Floor 4 – These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, are Drop-dead Good Looking and Help With Housework.
‘Oh, mercy me!’ she exclaims, ‘I can hardly stand it!’
Still, she goes to the fifth floor and the sign reads:

Floor 5 – These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, are Drop-dead Gorgeous, Help with Housework, and Have a Strong Romantic Streak.
She is so tempted to stay, but she goes to the sixth floor, where the sign reads:

Floor 6 – You are visitor 31,456,012 to this floor. There are no men on this floor. This floor exists solely as proof that women are impossible to please. Thank you for shopping at the Husband Store.
PLEASE NOTE:

To avoid gender bias charges, the store’s owner opened a New Wives store just across the street.

The first floor has wives that love sex.
The second floor has wives that love sex and have money and like beer.

The third, fourth, fifth and sixth floors have never been visited
 
Women have equal rights. Plain and simple.

Nah. It's not plain and simple. Being equal before the law is only one facet of equality.

Did you ever see that study done by a group at Yale on opportunity in academia, for example? It was posted in the war-room, and it was quite brilliant. In it, two groups of ~60 scientists in tenured positions, equally men and women, were given one CV to review. Both CV's were identical but for one detail: the name at the top of one was a generic female name, and the name at the top of one was a generic male name. The scientists were asked whether they would hire the person or not.

The result? The woman's CV scored significantly lower(like 20-30%) than the man's CV in every single respect. The interesting thing was that every argument made against the female was reasonable, and perfectly justifiable. None of the reasons were sexist in an outward way. However, these same reasonable justifications were not applied to the man's CV.
 
Was hoping for Ron Burgandy with a giagntic erection protest.


They are protesting hate speech on campus. When I has in college that was the safe open minded place to listen to people and their hate speech.

When I was in college protests were a safe place to pickup liberal girls and bring them back to your dorm for post protest beer pong.


Ahhhh, the glory days.
 
Nah. It's not plain and simple. Being equal before the law is only one facet of equality.

Did you ever see that study done by a group at Yale on opportunity in academia, for example? It was posted in the war-room, and it was quite brilliant. In it, two groups of ~60 scientists in tenured positions, equally men and women, were given one CV to review. Both CV's were identical but for one detail: the name at the top of one was a generic female name, and the name at the top of one was a generic male name. The scientists were asked whether they would hire the person or not.

The result? The woman's CV scored significantly lower(like 20-30%) than the man's CV in every single respect. The interesting thing was that every argument made against the female was reasonable, and perfectly justifiable. None of the reasons were sexist in an outward way. However, these same reasonable justifications were not applied to the man's CV.

There are many factors that can influence these decisions. It doesn't automatically prove sexism.
 
It's sad that small portions of feminist groups, such as the ones in this video, promote such hatred which is quite contrary to their goals. Most of them seemed to be sheep that were just following the herd without actually knowing what they're there for. As a general rule of life I believe that you should "practice what you preach." In other words, if you promote love, reason, understanding, and equality, then that is exactly how you should treat others and follow these principles through your life. This ensures that you will not be seen as "hypocritical" by other communities and creates a "moral high-ground" which will aid in your future battles. Hopefully those who were in this video will look back and learn from their mistakes and make better decisions in the future.
 
There are many factors that can influence these decisions. It doesn't automatically prove sexism.

What decision? There was no decision in the experiment. There was one single candidate, and they were asked to evaluate her competence.
 
plus the sample size is too small.

Based on what? In some experiments, small sample sizes can be very good, whereas in others, almost worthless. This isn't an epidemiological study, for example, which obligates thousands upon thousands of participants to be of any value whatsoever.

You can't just say "sample size too small." Too small to account for what?
 
I came in here reading Will Farrel....then I get a video of people shouting women hold half a sky or some shit. I'm out of here.
 
Come on down, I'll introduce you to basically the overwhelming majority of females I've ever met. Although, if you go around saying shit like this:



You might get an extreme reaction.

Sometimes you make a frightening amount of sense for a Canadiens fan.
 
So...it is completely acceptable to promote degenerate sexual practices PROVIDED that one is a Feminist, correct?

So you can be Alfred Kinsey and abuse children and have your books be the bedrock of all sexual studies thereafter...

But if you're Warren Farrell, you can't write an incest study and come to the conclusion that some people might view (an abhorrent act) as positive?

Hmmm. Double-standard. How about we just let the research stand for itself?

The mark of Feminism (and Marxism, and Gay Rights, and generally Far-Leftism in general) is to disparage reason by advocating arguments from emotion.

The UoT is intellectually a gulag. No dissent allowed from the Far-Leftist orthodoxy. The police should have arrested the violent protestors.

Yep, the one women's studies student even said it outright, "We don't tolerate that type of thought here". 'Thought police' is an accurate term.
 
Last edited:
Yep, the one women's studies student even said it outright, "We don't tolerate that type of though here". 'Thought police' is an accurate term.

Yea a lot of liberals are no better then the backwards conservatives they hate so much when it comes to respecting others beliefs. My older brother is very liberal and he told me, not joking at all and very serious, that racism should be illegal. He didn't mean crimes inspired by racism or anything like that, he meant just being racist should be illegal. Now I'm not defending racism, I totally against it, but I defend peoples right to believe whatever the fuck they want to believe, so long as they don't harm anyone because of those beliefs. But my older brother flat out supports thought police. It's disturbing. I have three siblings and only one of them is moderate. The other two are liberal agenda pushers and sometimes really disturb me with what they say.
 
Funny how legs Moheney said it doesn't make any sense for it to say "generally" when it clearly makes much more sense that way.

images
 
Tottally thought they were protesting Will Ferrell for his anchorman character.
 
That girl at the end is just a pocket full of sunshine, isn't she?
 
What are these morons doing out of the kitchen? Why hasn't any man gone in there and put his pimp hand to good use?
 
Yea a lot of liberals are no better then the backwards conservatives they hate so much when it comes to respecting others beliefs. My older brother is very liberal and he told me, not joking at all and very serious, that racism should be illegal. He didn't mean crimes inspired by racism or anything like that, he meant just being racist should be illegal. Now I'm not defending racism, I totally against it, but I defend peoples right to believe whatever the fuck they want to believe, so long as they don't harm anyone because of those beliefs. But my older brother flat out supports thought police. It's disturbing. I have three siblings and only one of them is moderate. The other two are liberal agenda pushers and sometimes really disturb me with what they say.

That would be totally unreasonable.

Everyone knows there's no racism anymore, anyways. Blacks have equal rights under law.
 
Back
Top