Feminist protest against Warren Farrell

Yeesh, that is seriously the worst demonstration of poor reading skills and absurd taking-quotes-out-of-context I've seen since Democratic Senator Jim Webb was accused of being pro-:eek::eek::eek::eek:philia.


In the scan here from the link he does in fact mention groping childrens genitals
http://www.nnflp.org/farrell/taboo6.jpg

Unless this is doctored I think its safe to say he is a sick fuck. I knew his Michael Jacksonesque tone of his voice w as a give away
 
In the scan here from the link he does in fact mention groping childrens genitals
http://www.nnflp.org/farrell/taboo6.jpg

Unless this is doctored I think its safe to say he is a sick fuck. I knew his Michael Jacksonesque tone of his voice w as a give away

Wait what? The scan is of quotes from researchers and therapists and psychiatrists and people who work in the biological sciences who have studied incest scientifically/sociologically. It isn't just about the research Farrell did (and the other researchers seem to agree with Farrell's own findings.)

And the quote does look doctored or mistranscribed (ie "genitally" when it should be "generally").
 
Wait what? The scan is of quotes from researchers and therapists and psychiatrists and people who work in the biological sciences who have studied incest scientifically/sociologically. It isn't just about the research Farrell did (and the other researchers seem to agree with Farrell's own findings.)And the quote does look doctored or mistranscribed (ie "genitally" when it should be "generally")

In the second paragraph in it has a direct quote from Farrell stating its possible children and parents sexuality is being stifled because they latter isn't groping the formers junk . This isn't a vague statement or one open to interpretation its is clear and concise. I dont see how it originally being "generally" fits into the statement. It would make no sense actually.

proof.png
 
In the second paragraph in it has a direct quote from Farrell stating its possible children and parents sexuality is being stifled because they latter isn't groping the formers junk . This isn't a vague statement or one open to interpretation its is clear and concise. I dont see how it originally being "generally" fits into the statement. It would make no sense actually.

proof.png

I suspect you're not serious with that interpretation of Farrell's words, since THE PARAGRAPH DIRECTLY ABOVE IT indicates Farrell almost didn't publish his book/findings for fear of people misinterpreting it and using it to excuse the "exploitation" of women by men.

Farrell is talking about how any contact by parents with children is now seen in a creepy :eek::eek::eek::eek:philic way (a theme that is now a cliche in pop culture and is featured even in standup routines by people like Bill Burr and Louis CK.) It's been talked about endlessly in the mainstream media for fuck's sake. If you can't see how the word "generally" entirely changes the meaning of the quote then I can't help you. He's obviously reiterating the endlessly discussed talking point about how any touching of children by adults/parents is now creepified, probably deliberately, by hysterical types who see sexual motives where there are none.

Repressing the natural urge for normal human contact, furthermore, probably stunts the sexuality of people when they become adults (after all, if you're uncomfortable/unaccustomed with normal touching as a kid, then as an adult you'll probably be somewhat fucked up when it comes to relationships, sex, etc.)

Anyway, I eagerly await further attempts to paint Warren Farrell as an incest-loving creep or perhaps even serial-killer. I'm sure your imagination will come up with something interesting and fantastical!

*Michael_Jackson_eats_popcorn_at_a_movie.gif*
 
Repressing the natural urge for normal human contact, furthermore, probably stunts the sexuality of people when they become adults (after all, if you're uncomfortable/unaccustomed with normal touching as a kid, then as an adult you'll probably be somewhat fucked up when it comes to relationships, sex, etc.)

Yes this is indeed true but the problem is he then goes on to state it also represses the parents sexuality.

How In the fuck does not "generally" touching your kids repress your own sexuality? That addition there is precisely what calls his statement into question and makes it carry more weight that he did in fact say genitally
 
Maybe it meant "gently" instead of generally.


I severely doubt genitally hahahahahhahahaha.
 
Anyone who speaks the truth will always be violently attacked. Tis the way of the world.

Funny how legs Moheney said it doesn't make any sense for it to say "generally" when it clearly makes much more sense that way.
 
I read this as Will Ferrel and was very confused as to his views on incest.
 
Anyone who speaks the truth will always be violently attacked. Tis the way of the world.

Funny how legs Moheney said it doesn't make any sense for it to say "generally" when it clearly makes much more sense that way.

I agree with you.
 
Looked it up and the author, or Warren, claims it was a misquote. Go figure.

He also seems to be attacked for saying incest can be a positive experience for both involved, although for father daughter incest that's very rarely the case. Not that crazy of a belief to me.

This guy doesn't sound twisted, he seems to use reason and logic. His attackers use emotion.

If there is any more evidence other then a misquote, call to emotions, or denial of sociology in general, I'd be interested to hear.
 
Look Ive never heard of this guy, and I have no idea if hes for or against date rape or incest...I will agree quote mining is used a lot in situations like this. But people like these protesters make me ashamed to be from Toronto. Whether its this, or that ridiculous slutwalk, or just the average downtown hipsters and dumb feminazi bitches, always complaining about first world problems. Look at these morons yelling at the cops, look at that bearded loser talking about the "patriarchy", they are an embarrassment to this city.
 
I wonder what the context of calling date rape "exciting" was. I have a feeling it is along the same lines as someone saying that for serial killers, killing people is exciting. They made it seem like he said "you know I date raped some girl and it was really exciting."
 
I wonder what the context of calling date rape "exciting" was. I have a feeling it is along the same lines as someone saying that for serial killers, killing people is exciting. They made it seem like he said "you know I date raped some girl and it was really exciting."

Well I haven't read anything this Warren Farrell guy has wrote or said. I never even heard of him until this thread. But this could very well be the case. My sister is a hardcore brainwashed feminist just like the dumbasses in this video and I remember talking with her about a song that was singing about a guy who beat and killed his wife. I tried to tell her that the singer was singing ABOUT this violent act, but she was hell bent on believing that he was promoting it. She really is just as psycho as the people in this video.

This is more proof that feminism is an extremist group. They don't accomplish anything and they don't have any positive influences. In this video, they were denying somebodies 1st Amendment rights and fought with the police.
 
This is more proof that feminism is an extremist group. They don't accomplish anything and they don't have any positive influences. In this video, they were denying somebodies 1st Amendment rights and fought with the police.

Yeah, it's definitely not that feminists have extremists and moderates like every other group on the planet.
 
Yeah, it's definitely not that feminists have extremists and moderates like every other group on the planet.

I have yet to meet a moderate feminist. In this modern day and age, there is no use for feminism, so it's only purpose is to attract the extremists.
 
I have yet to meet a moderate feminist. In this modern day and age, there is no use for feminism, so it's only purpose is to attract the extremists.

Weird. I consider myself a moderate feminist. Can you tell me what would make my views extreme so I can confirm or deny that I am an extremist?
 
I have yet to meet a moderate feminist.

Come on down, I'll introduce you to basically the overwhelming majority of females I've ever met. Although, if you go around saying shit like this:

In this modern day and age, there is no use for feminism, so it's only purpose is to attract the extremists.

You might get an extreme reaction.
 
Back
Top