- Joined
- Jul 6, 2007
- Messages
- 20,169
- Reaction score
- 6,457
Male infant mutilation is happening daily all over the USA. Why is this any worse?
Because the male infants will still be able to procreate when they are men.
Male infant mutilation is happening daily all over the USA. Why is this any worse?
By this logic everyone who supports BLM needs to be thrown in jail.
You're the moron who wants to abolish an entire government division because 1 guys is alleged to have done something wrongSure brainlet, that makes sense
Future birth preventers = bad
Actual murdering of babies in the womb = good
You can’t make up this leftist logic, I tell you.
And yeah - anyone caught breaking the law needs to be punished to the full extent.
Some of you are just lawless fucks. Instead of reforming the police, ICE, and DHS, you want to abolish them. Makes no sense.
You're the moron who wants to abolish an entire government division because 1 guys is alleged to have done something wrong
ICE is less than 20 years old and was not needed in the first place. they have 20,000 employees and outsource hundreds of thousands more through private detention centers. ICE needs to go.
DHS was formed in 2002 and has 250,000 employees. DHS needs to be much smaller.
Police department sizes are determined at the state/municipal levels they serve. Which is just fine. To be honest, police departments could be much smaller if we did not ask them to do things they are not set up or equipped to do properly. And that is on us.
2/3 of what police do is dealing with people with mental health or substance abuse problems. Go to any county jail on the weekend and see how few people are there for things other than that.
What we need to do is take some of the police budget and devote it to those things. Then stop asking police to essentially be a mental health ward and substance abuser holding center.
Fun fact: the Nazis sterilization program was inspired by the USthats pretty messed up
basically what the nazis did in sterilizing jews
Thankfully, this was complete nonsense. Thread:
Do explain why you think ICE is not needed?
Simple. All the people being detained should either be allowed to remain in the US and work, or be immediately deported. Give them temporary visa's that allow them to work and pay taxes, or kick them out. The absolute worst case scenario for everyone is to store them in cages. That costs everyone and benefits no one.
Here is some interesting math for you. Currently we are paying roughly $25,000 per person per year to detain these folks. If they were working and paying taxes, they would be contributing to our Social Security and Medicare benefits- which they would never be eligible to receive.
So, I will put it to you- Pay 25k per year head to keep thousands of people who (aside from showing up) have committed no crime in cages, or let them come in, work, and fund our retirements?
really?The complaint as worded is a little thin. There’s a lot of generalization, assumption and apparent language barrier in play here. If it’s true, it’s something that nobody can support. I’d be surprised if even dyed in the wool trump supporters would attempt to rationalize this. Right now denial works, because it’s not a definitive allegation.
really?
Thankfully, this was complete nonsense. Thread:
I dont disagree. I was just wondering what your thought process was. It makes sense. I personally believe ICE should be for actually customs and busting CRIMINAL illegals. And no, Im not talking about immigrants whose only crime is crossing the border illegally, im talking about the MS 13s of the world.
Concur. But the DHS already has an 48 Billion budget, with resources allocated to that. The people housing detainees in makeshift prisons are not the people you send after MS 13.
People who suggest completely de-funding DHS are knuckleheads. They probably don't even know what the DHS is. Most of the departments within the DHS existed well before the DHS was formed in 2002. FEMA, the Secret Service, and the fucking Coast guard in within the DHS for fuck sakes.
But it would be fair to say that if Cooks1 was emperor, there would be some major resource shuffling, and it would probably be much smaller overall.