- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
- Messages
- 3,024
- Reaction score
- 5,806
I don’t have to cause you know yur argument is bullshit but fine. Werdum won the heavyweight ufc belt older than fedor was when he got plooked by a middleweight n doom had been at it for double digit years. George Forman won the boxing hw belt at 50. DC won ufc hw belt while pushing 40 n it was after a long career that included all the wear n tear of wrestling. Randy won it at 43ish after a long career that span across wrestling boxing and mma. Sean O’Malley of all people has been fighting for 10ish years now and he’s better now than he was then n just a few years younger than when fedors strike force fail began.
what is hard to understand about the concept of a semi prime? It obviously means just “slightly” diminished from your prime. Everybody said fedor was number 1 when he went into the doom fight n lost then they said “oh it was a fluke look he rocked n dropped doom then got fluke subbed.” 2 losses with their respective excuses later n conveniently he’s out of his prime to save face.
you can’t always blame losses on leaving prime but rather a competition step up. Fedor was bigger than most of his opponents by the way so the giant that slayed Goliath myth needs to go away
Werdum started fighting years after Fedor and was also caught using PEDs.
Randy started fighting at 33 years old and was a PED user. You think he would be peaking at 40 years old if he started fighting professionally at 22 years old like Fedor? I doubt it.
DC like Randy started fighting at 32 years old. I doubt he would be peaking at 40 if he started fighting in his early 20s.
Foreman is an anomaly, obviously.
Fedor was still good when he started losing but there was no way he was still peaking in 2011, 8 years after becoming the world champion. Show me one MMA fighter who was still in their prime 8 years later after becoming the world champion.
Kobe Bryant was still good at 39 years old. He scored 60 points in his final game but he was still mentally and physically cooked by then and clearly past his prime.
I don't make excuses for Fedor. He lost. But there are a Group of posters on this forum who like to spin it like he was at his absolute best when he started losing which is just bullshit to make him look bad.
His coaches said he was slowing down since 2008. He lost in Sambo already and looked to be clearly declining around the Hunt- Lindland fights. He went on to still win a few more but by the time he fought AA and Rogers it was clear he was on the decline and that mixed results were coming.