FBI reopens Clinton investigation as new emails found PART 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Huma's been whispering in Hillary's ear for 17 years.....

Yeah, amazing really.

I've noticed that the Marxists, globalists, and the Islamists are in an alliance. Same goals (power in Western nations) I suppose.

It's why you will see Feminists that adopt cultural Marxism fighting against 'Islamophobia' and see them as allies, and Europe being hit with the engineered mass migrations while the Marxists are all for it.
 
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/10/04/us/politics/trump-foundation-money.html


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432826/donald-trump-scandals-business-failures-roundup


He's managed to do all of this as a property manager. I can't even begin the amount of shade and thuggery he will bring into the White House. Plus this asshole thinks he knows more than the Generals. He's a thug and a shitty human in every way. He's not going to help anyone. This dude thinks global warming is a myth perpetrated by China. His idea of a great America is rich people making bank with no government regulation and letting them "bless" the less fortunate with high paying jobs. That doesn't work. It didn't work before, and the only jobs he will bring back are low paying crap jobs. He has no vision. I'm just amazed that people think he represents the values of America.

And you think Hilary does? A woman who defended a man she knew was guilty of raping a 12 year old girl and laughed about it afterwards? A woman who lied about her husband's affairs to the American people? A woman who wants to set up a no fly zone in Syria, in spite of the fact that high ranking officers have warned this would lead to war with Russia? A woman so fucking stupid she couldn't even understand basic email security?

Nice set of values you have there, dude:rolleyes:
 
A Clinton administration will never be anything other than a still born death with the FBI investigations guaranteed to absorb the majority of her first term presidency.
 



I like the Judge, but I'm not sure about his criticism on how Comey has stepped out of line. I agree it's come to that, but I think it's the DOJ to blame. The AG compromised the entire case with her Slick Willy tarmac meeting. Then put it on Jim to "announce" the findings.

So when was it taken out of his hands such that normal guidelines and boundaries would apply? Seems he should be held to the standard of a surrogate AG, whatever that authority and responsibility looks like.
 
wV2o_v10MGlnxbm3xEBlo7DeaerbUxZlh7BLTdTCTNc.jpg
 
A Clinton administration will never be anything other than a still born death with the FBI investigations guaranteed to absorb the majority of her first term presidency.
she'll raid the coffers, write executive orders, remove and install federal judges all over the states, wear out air force one making deals all over the globe, likely start several wars (at least one), she'll basically do anything she wants
 
How 'bad' Trump is is over exaggerated in this race. Hes easily worth a vote when Clinton is the competition. But strongly agree with the rest

Agreed.

Surely the corrupt media (which has been proven over and over) has had a hand in tarnishing Trump's image far more than what is legitimate.

IMO the country needs someone who'll take the bull by the horns and pilot the country back in the right direction. No need for qualifiers, people.
 



I like the Judge, but I'm not sure about his criticism on how Comey has stepped out of line. I agree it's come to that, but I think it's the DOJ to blame. The AG compromised the entire case with her Slick Willy tarmac meeting. Then put it on Jim to "announce" the findings.

So when was it taken out of his hands such that normal guidelines and boundaries would apply? Seems he should be held to the standard of a surrogate AG, whatever that authority and responsibility looks like.


I think the investigation has been a mess and actually agree with that Governor on this: he was wrong in July and he's wrong now.
But I also agree with you; I think the DoJ messed up terribly and pretty much forced Comey's errors (at least the July one). I think he took one for the DoJ team in July and I think he wound up taking one for the FBI in October.
 
I'm super dubious of Huma and her role with Clinton.
 
But I also agree with you; I think the DoJ messed up terribly and pretty much forced Comey's errors (at least the July one). I think he took one for the DoJ team in July and I think he wound up taking one for the FBI in October.

Yep. I think had we all not been so taken aback by the tarmac meeting we wouldn't have been so eager to let someone/anyone else make the call (other than the AG). The entire investigation should have been a reset at that point. But too bad time has been so short due to all the feet-dragging that went on for over a year with no earnest attempt to get to the bottom of things (as evidenced by 5 immunity agreement and 0 subpoenas issued).
 
Enlighten me. What makes Trump more likely to start a world war than the candidate who voted yes to every war or military attack, and wants a no fly zone over russia and syria?

It literally boils down to a less than glowing use of the word Muslim by Trump for these Dem supporters.

How much are Muslims directing traffic from celebrities to college neophytes at less than 1% of the population?
 
The FBI vigorously examining the emails . . . Regardless of the content Hillary should be done.
 
Why do you think so? Intent was not proven the first time, why is this time different?

Beause intent has nothing to do with it.

If anyone else did anything she has done, they would at a minimum lose their access to confidential material, along with their job (let alone facing criminal charges).

Hillary should most definitely never be able to hold a classified rank again, which would also exclude her from holding the position of President.

The intent or content of the emails is completely irrelevant to both points.
 
Why do you think so? Intent was not proven the first time, why is this time different?

I should have written "should have been done." I'm not sure the outcome of this go-round, but "not proving intent" the first time around is synonymous to Lorretta Lynch saying under oath that she doesn't know what perjury is. The high rank of the position implies knowledge of the basics and should be judged accordingly.
 
Beause intent has nothing to do with it.

If anyone else did anything she has done, they would at a minimum lose their access to confidential material, along with their job (let alone facing criminal charges).

Hillary should most definitely never be able to hold a classified rank again, which would also exclude her from holding the position of President.

The intent or content of the emails is completely irrelevant to both points.

Yes, but Comey explicitly said that his reasoning for not indicting her was that intent was not found, which led to Gowdy et al. to question this thought process given the rule of law.

She didn't know what "C" meant, so she was cleared. How is this time any different? The only answer would lie beyond the classified documents themselves to a clear e-mail showing wrong-doing.

This whole scandal is a mystery.
 
I should have written "should have been done." I'm not sure the outcome of this go-round, but "not proving intent" the first time around is synonymous to Lorretta Lynch saying under oath that she doesn't know what perjury is. The high rank of the position implies knowledge of the basics and should be judged accordingly.

Consider me incredulous. I don't think she gets indicted given the past investigation. I'm not buying the FBI mutiny angle, but one can hope.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top