Favorite War Room Posters

[Overtures]

fuck all of yall

 

[RhinoRush]

Holy shit this thread is gay as fuck.

Someone's just mad he knows no one will nominate him. Transparent as fuck.

 

[Overtures]

@panamaican

is the only one forever and ever, amen


@Gandhi

is pure of heart

@Jack V Savage

is hated out of insecurity

@Fawlty

is kind of crazy (kind of, dude, just kind of), but he is really good at shit talking

@Rational Poster

always talks the best shit

@ripskater

is a solid dude through and through beyond the schtick and all the politics

@TheGreatA

is intelligent

@lecter

is consistent and prob racist but i still like him.

@Madmick

sticks to his guns

@Hans Gruber , @klnOmega , @HereticBD , and @TheStruggle

are permanently rustled

 

[RhinoRush]

CNN is the network that hired fucking Corey Lewandowski while he's still on Trump's payroll, which is a major breach of ethics. Crazy that anyone would think that they're not pro-Trump. - Jack V Savage

CNN is pro-Trump according to Jack V Savage

 

[ArchGoat]

Me obviously

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Me obviously

In your honor then.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

@glennrod
@Blackened

 

[KBE6EKCTAH_CCP]

In their favor, they barely missed the cutoff to be ID'd as genocidal monsters. Napoleon is remembered as this cute little debonair dude, instead of a brutal genocidal dictator. He was like a proto Hitler who missed his time to shine.

The French largely managed to suppress much of their history and portray it in shiny happy form, where they were always the good guys.

Please explain yourself, because this post is surprisingly misguided coming from you.

 

[Arkain2K]

There's a handful but I make sure I don't skim, but read every word @Zankou and @Bald1 says and @Arkain2K is solid as well. Oh and @sodapopinski When he has time

Now that's a nice line-up right there.

I'm gonna dovetail your nomination list and add our WR Foreign Correspondents news panel: @Ruprecht from Australia, @JDragon from Germany, @Rod1 from Mexico, and @ShinkanPo from the Philippines.

If I have one wish for the WR, it's that we have more users from abroad to report stuff straight from the scene.

(We have a lot of active posters from Canada and Britain on here, but they don't make new threads on their important regional news as much as they should. I'd take interesting world news over the usual WR bickering craps any day of the week!)

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Now that's a nice line-up right there.

I'm gonna dovetail your nomination list and add our WR Foreign Correspondents news panel: @Ruprecht from Australia, @JDragon from Germany, @Rod1 from Mexico, and @ShinkanPo from the Philippines.

If I have one wish for the WR, it's that we have more users from abroad to report stuff straight from the scene.

(There are a lot of good posters from Canada, but ever since the Rise of Trudeau, I finds the

Here's your a broad, you discriminating fuck.

Spoiler

Whose more out in the middle of nowhere than Hawaiians???

 

[Arkain2K]

Here's your a broad, you discriminating fuck.

Spoiler

Whose more out in the middle of nowhere than Hawaiians???

A Hawaiian applying to the WR Foreign News correspondence panel is as convincing as Puerto Rico applying for U.S statehood

 

[Almighty Angus]

@Deffid @Palis @Dr J @HunterSdVa29

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

A Hawaiian applying to the WR Foreign News correspondence panel is as convincing as Puerto Rico applying for U.S statehood

Bruh...Barak himself was advocating Injun status.

 

[Zankou]

Please explain yourself, because this post is surprisingly misguided coming from you.

Created a military dictatorship that sought to dominate all of Europe, killing ten million people in an impossibly horrific conflagration. Pioneered mass conscription and total war in the service of rabid nationalism. Ultimately failed. It's not overly subtle.

This was just slightly before the era when ruinous military dictators whose wars of maniacal nationalist ambition kill millions were seen as 'bad.'

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

It's not overly subtle.

Indubitably.

 

[KBE6EKCTAH_CCP]

Created a military dictatorship that sought to dominate all of Europe, killing ten million people in an impossibly horrific conflagration. Pioneered mass conscription and total war in the service of rabid nationalism. Ultimately failed. It's not overly subtle.

This was just slightly before the era when ruinous military dictators whose wars of maniacal nationalist ambition kill millions were seen as 'bad.'

Two things :

Napoleon was essentially and in essence at war against European aristocracy. He was a reformer.

And yes he was a nationalist but not in the ethnical sense. No, he was not genocidal.

Sure he had his flaws but I thoroughly reject the comparison with Hitler.

 

[ShinkanPo]

Now that's a nice line-up right there.

I'm gonna dovetail your nomination list and add our WR Foreign Correspondents news panel: @Ruprecht from Australia, @JDragon from Germany, @Rod1 from Mexico, and @ShinkanPo from the Philippines.

If I have one wish for the WR, it's that we have more users from abroad to report stuff straight from the scene.

(We have a lot of active posters from Canada and Britain on here, but they don't make new threads on their important regional news as much as they should. I'd take interesting world news over the usual WR bickering craps any day of the week!)

 

[Zankou]

Two things :

Napoleon was essentially and in essence at war against European aristocracy. He was a reformer.

And yes he was a nationalist but not in the ethnical sense. No, he was not genocidal.

Sure he had his flaws but I thoroughly reject the comparison with Hitler.

In our era, killing people for explicit racial reasons is the most monstrous crime imaginable, while killing them for reasons of ethnic national supremacy, the predecessor, is totally different. But it's not really that different.

Every imperial dictator aims to be a reformist. It's incredibly rare for that not to be true. When the Japanese invaded china and Korea, they cast themselves as heroes liberating the people from feudal oppression, a la Napoleon. And, in fairness, they did a lot of reform. But they were also monstrous dictatorial killers, subjugating the continent under Japanese nationalist supremacy.

Generally when somebody argues that a savage war was necessary to effectuate some change, I tend to ask whether that change was already occurring in other nations that didn't get slaughtered, and didn't have dictators.

 

[The ScorpioN]

@AviatorShades, if he wrote a daily/weekly article I'd gladly subscribe and read.

@TheGreatA is always on point

most of the warroom is pretty awesome, some serious discussions peppered with quality trolling.

 

[KBE6EKCTAH_CCP]

In our era, killing people for explicit racial reasons is the most monstrous crime imaginable, while killing them for reasons of ethnic national supremacy, the predecessor, is totally different. But it's not really that different.

Every imperial dictator aims to be a reformist. It's incredibly rare for that not to be true. When the Japanese invaded china and Korea, they cast themselves as heroes liberating the people from feudal oppression, a la Napoleon. And, in fairness, they did a lot of reform. But they were also monstrous dictatorial killers, subjugating the continent under Japanese nationalist supremacy.

Generally when somebody argues that a savage war was necessary to effectuate some change, I tend to ask whether that change was already occurring in other nations that didn't get slaughtered, and didn't have dictators.

These are generalities and I feel like you are playing with words.

Napoleon never engaged in mass-killings based on ethnicity.

Actually, Napoleon's idea of his empire was that it would be multiethnic.

It was rather egalitarian as well, at least compared with most European powers of the time. Napoleon believed in a meritocracy and not privilege based on birth. He did have to play the game to a certain extent, though, obviously.

Napoleon was by birth an Italian. He spoke broken French when he was young. He came from piss & shit nobility that everyone laughed at in Paris.

So no, Napoleon was a true reformer as well as a visionary for his time.