It's remarkable how American conservatives can just invent new realities and keep repeating them to each other over and over until they are true.
LBJ has never expressed support of the Chinese government, and he probably doesn't have much knowledge of the Chinese government, although probably more than the average conservative. Yet his grave sin was....
failing to criticize the Chinese government to conservatives' liking, which they packaged as a hypocrisy relating to his domestic (American) activism
And, as for the situation in Hong Kong itself, James still didn't have much to say at all: "I felt like with this particular situation, it was something that not only was I not informed enough about, I just felt like it was something that not only myself and my teammates or our organization had enough information to even talk about it at that point in time, and we still feel the same way."
...
Still, for years, James has taken up the mantle of progressive issues, and so, yes, for many it was disappointing to see him tread so cautiously on what seems, from here, to be such a clear-cut matter of right and wrong.
But targeting James and accusing him, personally, of suborning a communist dictatorship for his inartful comments is misplaced at best — an attempt to score cheap culture war points while letting the NBA itself off the hook, according to Dr. Harry Edwards, a renowned social justice activist and professor of sociology who has served as an adviser to Colin Kaepernick, Muhammad Ali, John Carlos and Tommie Smith.
The very same people trying to dunk on him now have often had little interest in hearing about social justice causes in America — particularly when James was involved — but, suddenly, they weirdly feel like his voice is not only valued, but also required. What’s more, they seem to feel that his unwillingness to speak about the Hong Kong protesters voids all of his prior advocacy efforts, the school he built in Akron, the spotlight he’s brought on police brutality and state-sanctioned violence and his lobbying for greater gun control, according to those critics. Edwards isn’t having it: “That’s not just disingenuous, it's degenerate,” he said.
Basically, the entire narrative is just a way for right wing puds to leverage anti-Chinese sentiment toward dismissing James' activism for black issues. To the extent that they care about Hong Kong or Taiwan, it's almost exclusively so they can say "see, you don't
really care black lives - you're just a puppet!"
And it's not like American conservatives themselves
really care about democracy and due process and free speech: for all of American history, they've been attacking those things while liberals try to protect them.
With that said, Go Suns
@Anung Un Rama @Jesus H. Sherdog