I didn't show evidence but did indicate where it is. What does this have to do with not knowing what a fact is? In fact you are the one who doesn't know what it is. You keep using the term "prove" in the context of synthetic statements (matters of fact as Hume put it). "Proof" belongs to mathematics and logic which are a priori and necessary truths (relations of ideas as Hume put it). So asking for proof is a category error from your part.
Then you follow this fallacious reasoning by claiming that I have no evidence. If by evidence you mean proof then you are right. I cannot prove it to you like I can prove 1+1=2. What I do have is evidence that would make my claim more probable than its contradictory. I didn't present the evidence, I can direct you to it if you are sincerely interested. And this is not equivalent to blind faith. Stop projecting.
If someone makes a claim of fact then asking for proof is wrong. You should ask for evidence.
You say my argument is not worthwhile. Where did I put forth an argument? That post is no argument. So you don't know what proof and evidence are and you don't know what argument are either. And you say I think and talk like a kid... irony...
PS: what evidential argument from evil are you referring to because there are many versions that differ a lot, each focusing in a specific or general thing in the world.
You could have achieved the same failure of a post without the arrogance and condescension bro, it would have made you look less bad.
It look like you're posteng and sald.these are romanesco broccoli's
![]()
they grow in a very fractal like pattern
Holy shit ...You can't pinch your nose and hum
I just did it with both hands... left hand cramped up a bit but still did it.It's impossible to tuck your thumb into your hand and then flick your wrist downwards
huh? are you having a stroke lolIt look like you're posteng and sald.
I was looking at pineapples growing just yesterday, in fact.
Being the crazy chap that I am.
Machida laughs at your post.huh? are you having a stroke lol
What's pretentious about stating facts and responding to other's objections?Your entire presence in this thread is simply you being as pretentious as possible.
What's pretentious about stating facts and responding to other's objections?
an sald!!!!!huh? are you having a stroke lol
Nothing, but you didn't state a fact, you stated an assertion on a topic that you knew would start the back and forth debate that it always does despite the thread having nothing to do with it. Then you use the opportunity to regurgitate the same tired rhetoric and empty, misapplied philosophical standpoints that this forum has already seen ad nauseam.
I did state facts where you quoted me in post #183. The assertion I made in the second page of this thread was never claimed to be a fact, though I believe it is.
The only one regurgitating empty rhetoric is you actually and everyone can see it. In the post you quoted I refuted everything that was flung at me. I demonstrated to everyone how that guy was wrong. What you have done here is basically fling some poo at me for whatever personal reasons you have. You can't actually back up your claim that I regurgitated rhetoric and empty misapplied philosophy so you just make fling it and hope it sticks.
Come back when you have something of substance. I'll be eagerly awaiting.