Exposing the Grift: Go Woke Go Broke

Assuming that's what happened, that would be like reason 474937 that Ubisoft is going down the shitter. Company hasn't made good games in lord knows how many years.
Regardless of what you think of them, their games have sold really well up until recently. It was really just the last year or so they got into big shit, releasing failure after failure. Games based on huge franchises like Avatar and Star Wars miserably failing. That live service pirate game failing, and now the backlash to this new AC game.

Doesn't take much to knock a house of cards down.
 
Regardless of what you think of them, their games have sold really well up until recently. It was really just the last year or so they got into big shit, releasing failure after failure. Games based on huge franchises like Avatar and Star Wars miserably failing. That live service pirate game failing, and now the backlash to this new AC game.

Doesn't take much to knock a house of cards down.
Look at BioWare. Their stretch of KOTOR, Jade Empire ME and then Dragon Age was unbelievable. I thought they were going to be one of the companies that never crumbled.
 
There are games that have left-leaning political elements that are really good, and did very well. I don't think most people take issue with CyberPunk or TLoU2 because of "wokeness".
TLOU2 ate quite a bit of shit for it, but it was always gonna be too big to fail.

Progressive themes in games isn't the problem. Hiring goober activists to lead the direction of these projects is the problem. You can incorporate certain themes into games without it coming off as a lame after school special. The people they're hiring to lead these projects simply aren't talented and have their priorities all screwed up. Their priority is pushing an agenda. They treat the games like a vessel for activism. They don't care if the game is actually good or not. Being able to use the industry as a megaphone to push their agenda is all they care about.
 
Regardless of what you think of them, their games have sold really well up until recently. It was really just the last year or so they got into big shit, releasing failure after failure. Games based on huge franchises like Avatar and Star Wars miserably failing. That live service pirate game failing, and now the backlash to this new AC game.

Doesn't take much to knock a house of cards down.
What games have sold well up until recently? Ubisoft has been circling the drain for a decade or more.
 
The game isn't even out, unless you're talking about Outlaws. Which, like I said. Ubisoft just doesn't make good games regularly.
Sorry, I got confused and thought we were talking about veilguard for some reason

There's too many woke trash entertainment projects about these days
 
TLOU2 ate quite a bit of shit for it, but it was always gonna be too big to fail.

Progressive themes in games isn't the problem. Hiring goober activists to lead the direction of these projects is the problem. You can incorporate certain themes into games without it coming off as a lame after school special. The people they're hiring to lead these projects simply aren't talented and have their priorities all screwed up. Their priority is pushing an agenda. They treat the games like a vessel for activism. They don't care if the game is actually good or not. Being able to use the industry as a megaphone to push their agenda is all they care about.
Agreed on TLoU2 but I was always under the impression that had more to do with Abby killing Joel than Abby herself. Joel was viewed by lots of fans as Cyber-Jesus

Hey I just gave ND their next idea, have Joel rise from the dead in the third game
 
The people they're hiring to lead these projects simply aren't talented and have their priorities all screwed up. Their priority is pushing an agenda. They treat the games like a vessel for activism. They don't care if the game is actually good or not. Being able to use the industry as a megaphone to push their agenda is all they care about.

Really not sure why some people are fighting against something that is so self evidently correct.

Well I do know.

I just find the lack of logic in trying to argue something so blatantly false as laughable and embarrassing
 
What games have sold well up until recently? Ubisoft has been circling the drain for a decade or more.
Perhaps in innovation and quality. Not sales. "AC: Valhalla" alone made over a billion dollars for them. I think "Far Cry 6" might've slightly underperformed, but that's all I can think of prior to the cascade of poor releases in the past year.
 
Perhaps in innovation and quality. Not sales. "AC: Valhalla" alone made over a billion dollars for them. I think "Far Cry 6" might've slightly underperformed, but that's all I can think of prior to the cascade of poor releases in the past year.
There's videos out demonstrating Veilguard release and reception tanked the stock like 17%

What happened before with other things doesn't change that

Some people just have tod agenda their political team
 
Perhaps in innovation and quality. Not sales. "AC: Valhalla" alone made over a billion dollars for them. I think "Far Cry 6" might've slightly underperformed, but that's all I can think of prior to the cascade of poor releases in the past year.
Those things go hand in hand. Watch Dogs 2, Watchdog legion, Far Cry 6, Rb6 extraction, Hyper Scape, X Defiant, all those games underperformed or were just not good. And I could go on with even more.

Valhalla was just one success and it wasn't even moentizable to the same extent of a COD or other live service. That's nowhere enough to keep a publisher like Ubisoft afloat for a decade, even with RB6.

So like I said Ubisoft has been circling the drain for years, if not over a decade. What you're seeing this year is the results of decades of mismanagement and poor performance that are piling up.
 
Sorry, I got confused and thought we were talking about veilguard for some reason

There's too many woke trash entertainment projects about these days
Dragon age and its studios are their own shit show. Most projects that fail these days fail for obvious non political reasons in a genre where politics have always been inseparable from content.
 
Those things go hand in hand. Watch Dogs 2, Watchdog legion, Far Cry 6, Rb6 extraction, Hyper Scape, X Defiant, all those games underperformed or were just not good. And I could go on with even more.
That doesn't mean they weren't profitable, though. FC6 still managed to sell over ten million copies, for instance.

I think you're conflating quality with sales. It doesn't matter if a game "is not good", if it still sells. Although, in fairness, I do remember "Legion" being a pretty big disappointment
Valhalla was just one success and it wasn't even moentizable to the same extent of a COD or other live service. That's nowhere enough to keep a publisher like Ubisoft afloat for a decade, even with RB6.
It's not just Valhalla, though. AC is a juggernaut. Origins and Odyssey were also bringing in a lot of money for them, on top of other flagship brands like FC and R6. Most companies are lucky to have ONE big cash cow franchise. These boys have three. They were doing fine and had money to burn.
So like I said Ubisoft has been circling the drain for years, if not over a decade. What you're seeing this year is the results of decades of mismanagement and poor performance that are piling up.
That's simply not true. If what you're saying is true, you would've seen warning signs in the stock market long before it torpedoed. They were doing fine before this past year or so. They have not been "circling the drain" for a decade. They've been rather profitable up until recently. Some misses here and there of course, but nothing that would suggest they were in dire straights.
 
That doesn't mean they weren't profitable, though. FC6 still managed to sell over ten million copies, for instance.

I think you're conflating quality with sales. It doesn't matter if a game "is not good", if it still sells. Although, in fairness, I do remember "Legion" being a pretty big disappointment
Being profitable isn't good enough in this day and age for the game market, you have to beat investor expectations based off activision and other big publishers. Not to mention you need huge amounts of profitability to cover huge losses like Xdefiant or the Pirate Game whose name escapes me atm.
It's not just Valhalla, though. AC is a juggernaut. Origins and Odyssey were also bringing in a lot of money for them, on top of other flagship brands like FC and R6. Most companies are lucky to have ONE big cash cow franchise. These boys have three. They were doing fine and had money to burn.
AC is not a juggernaut financially. Origins was 2017 and Valhalla was 2020. R6 has kept Ubisoft afloat in many respects but it's super long in the tooth.

Ubisoft isn't a developer, they're a publisher and most big publishers have way more than one cash cow.
That's simply not true. If what you're saying is true, you would've seen warning signs in the stock market long before it torpedoed. They were doing fine before this past year or so. They have not been "circling the drain" for a decade. They've been rather profitable up until recently. Some misses here and there of course, but nothing that would suggest they were in dire straights
They've been a takeover target and under investor pressure for years. Again, being profitable isn't the goal here, their investors expect them to perform like a tencent or Activision or even EA, and they do not.

Not to mention ubisoft has massively missed the live service boom,, which again is a huge disappointment for shareholders.
 
AC is not a juggernaut financially.
Riiight. A multi-billion dollar franchise isn't a juggernaut. What is your definition of a juggernaut? "Minecraft, Fortnite, GTA or bust?"

You're just coming up with excuses to not admit you were wrong. You didn't even think they had a big seller in the last ten years, and now you're trying pretzel twist those games into failures, because you simply can't admit that you were wrong about their overall trajectory. They just started failing now. Not five years ago. Not ten years ago. Now.
 
Riiight. A multi-billion dollar franchise isn't a juggernaut. What is your definition of a juggernaut? "Minecraft, Fortnite, GTA or bust?"

You're just coming up with excuses to not admit you were wrong. You didn't even think they had a big seller in the last ten years, and now you're trying pretzel twist those games into failures, because you simply can't admit that you were wrong about their overall trajectory. They just started failing now. Not five years ago. Not ten years ago. Now.
COD, most licensed sports games, Pokémon, etc. Again Valhalla did well, but that was an outlier for Ubisoft and the series.

Where did I say they didn't have a big seller in the last 10 years? And Jesus dude, your logic is awful. Games take most of a decade to make, from preproduction to launch. If they're massively underperforming now, it means the problems started years ago.

I don't expect everyone to be a financial analyst but you have zero understanding of basic business planning (one game did well, how could the company be not doing well) or how the modern gaming industry operates. There's a reason most developers and investors alike don't dream of investing or working for Ubisoft.
 
Again Valhalla did well, but that was an outlier for Ubisoft and the series.
An outlier for the series and Ubisoft? So now you're arguing that AC in general wasn't a big deal before Valhalla, and Ubisoft has never had any other big successes outside of it? Really? Yes, this mega corporation were just getting by on a few mild successes...

My god...

Where did I say they didn't have a big seller in the last 10 years?
You didn't actually put a number on it. You were so sure that they have been failing for the past decade or so, that you completely forgot about one of their flagship franchises making over a billion dollars within that time. Now you're trying to basically say that it doesn't count, LOL.
And Jesus dude, your logic is awful. Games take most of a decade to make, from preproduction to launch. If they're massively underperforming now, it means the problems started years ago.
That is some serious cope, dude. When you say they have been "circling the drain", you were not commenting on unfinished games with unrealized potential. You were suggesting that they have been failing as a company in that time from games they had been releasing. Most, up until the last year or so, were moderately to highly successful.

I repeat, you're just making excuses to not admit you were wrong.
 
COD, most licensed sports games, Pokémon, etc. Again Valhalla did well, but that was an outlier for Ubisoft and the series.

Where did I say they didn't have a big seller in the last 10 years? And Jesus dude, your logic is awful. Games take most of a decade to make, from preproduction to launch. If they're massively underperforming now, it means the problems started years ago.

I don't expect everyone to be a financial analyst but you have zero understanding of basic business planning (one game did well, how could the company be not doing well) or how the modern gaming industry operates. There's a reason most developers and investors alike don't dream of investing or working for Ubisoft.
A quick glance shows their share price was very high from like. 2017-2021. It’s tanked massively since then. So 4-4.5 years ago they were doing well compared to their historical price .

Appears you are twisting facts to your predetermined narrative
 
An outlier for the series and Ubisoft? So now you're arguing that AC in general wasn't a big deal before Valhalla, and Ubisoft has never had any other big successes outside of it? Really? Yes, this mega corporation were just getting by on a few mild successes...
I gave you the list of flops or misses Ubisoft has had in recent years. They honestly likely outweigh the hits at this point. They've unfortunately been coasting design wise and now you're seeing the fruits of that in player apathy.
You didn't actually put a number on it. You were so sure that they have been failing for the past decade or so, that you completely forgot about one of their flagship franchises making over a billion dollars within that time. Now you're trying to basically say that it doesn't count, LOL.
I said they haven't been making good games consistently and that they've been circling the drain (ie the writing has been on the wall about their future prospects).
Let's make this simple. If I'm an investor, why would I put my money into Ubisoft instead of other publishers?
That is some serious cope, dude. When you say they have been "circling the drain", you were not commenting on unfinished games with unrealized potential. You were suggesting that they have been failing as a company in that time from games they had been releasing. Most, up until the last year or so, were moderately to highly successful.

I repeat, you're just making excuses to not admit you were wrong.
When I said circling the drain I was primarily referring to their mediocre output that was trending the wrong way, coupled with mass employee dissatisfaction and poor innovation. In sales terms, Ubisoft had some OK performance financially but a dogshit pipeline. And the latter is what the market cares more about.

Again, what has ubisoft done compared to other big publishers in the past decade? Activation produces a Vahalla sized hit every year or every other year. Tencent and Take 2 have much longer revenue tails die to love service and much better penetrstion into mobile. EA and Playstation have massive sports franchises that provide good returns every year that allows them to invest in new IP or AAA titles.
 
A quick glance shows their share price was very high from like. 2017-2021. It’s tanked massively since then. So 4-4.5 years ago they were doing well compared to their historical price .

Appears you are twisting facts to your predetermined narrative
How have they done compared to other publishers? Everyone did well in covid for games, so Ubisoft hasn't done much since 2019 pretty much, or the better part of the decade. Which was my original point...the company has been on a clearly questionable business trajectory for some time due to mismanagement and not updating most of their core products design wise or financially (live service).
 
Back
Top