• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Expect "Sinners" To Get Oscars For Most Significant Categories.

Im not really familiar with many other films that came out this year but I would expect it could very well win best production design.
 
Yup, definitely don't care


<lmao> <lmao> <lmao> <lmao>


Hey, how's it going, I'll be showing up ahead of schedule.

Coogler is one of the most overrated directors alive, I've said that in past threads, and it's only a testament to how emaciated prestige filmmaking is when it comes to ideas today that it's getting this many nominations. Nevertheless, while I think this film is overrated, it's at least interesting. It's unpredictable. It's ambitious. It's bold.

But FYI, Petey, the war is over, and my side won. The Oscars has become so marginalized as a beacon of mainstream culture that it can't even stay on network television. It's been banished to the Cable TV of today. I'm guessing you missed this headline:

The Oscars will abandon broadcast TV for YouTube starting in 2029

YouTube TV, specifically, the expensive subscription service ($83/mo) which is one of the few services-- like Fubo-- that has arisen to supplant what used to be Cable television subscriptions with premium Live TV coverage. YouTube TV currently boasts around 10m subscribers. This is a pitiful slice of the American population, which is roughly 350m, presently, and past viewership numbers have included counts of non-Americans like Canadians, too (2024 drew 4.5m Canadian viewers).

That's because the viewership chart looks like this:
oscars-viewership-ratings-chart.png

Not in the USA. Again, the broadcast will be on YouTube TV.

That is their premium subscription service starting at $83/mo standard rates (after promotional periods end).

There's already been rebroadcasting across the world (over 200 countries/territories) on various channels prior to this deal. This simplifies and centralizes it, but it has never been a significant draw, globally. These are basically Olympics rules, but unlike the Olympics, the rest of the world is far more indifferent.

They're desperately hoping they can drum up some momentum on international views because the ceremony is dying as a vehicle of prestige in the USA. This signaled the nail in that coffin.

<TrumpWrong1>
 
It was decent, kind of felt it was milking it's premise more than anything and felt more forgettable. It was like a b movie schtik made in seriousness ... I vagulely recall a dusk from dawn prequel or something like that set in the old west and that's what it reminded me of
 
The movie was ok. I get it credit for being somewhat different. But if you break it down, it is pretty much a reboot of from dusk till Dawn.
 
Alright, if so, I stand corrected, and that's a departure from the intent signaled in the WSJ article I read last year.
Holy shit, Mick, I swear I didn't think you had it in you. Sincerely kudos to you. {<redford}
 
Was it good? I haven't seen it
It is a decent movie to watch, it is basically a knock of Dusk til Dawn set in the south with black people. Definitely worth watching but it should not have so many Oscar nominations.
 
Back
Top