- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 55,079
- Reaction score
- 43,474
Was it good? I haven't seen it
8/10 sure, cool vibe. But basically a remake of From Dusk Til Dawn in a different setting. But it was good.
Was it good? I haven't seen it
Because Jackie Chan is all but retired lolWhy won't they make an oscar for best stunts already?
They should just give it all the Oscars. Who cares?
It's the equivalent of giving it used toilet paper.

They should just give it all the Oscars. Who cares?
It's the equivalent of giving it used toilet paper.
Hey, how's it going, I'll be showing up ahead of schedule.I look forward to the day after the big fancy pants awards gala spectacular when all the same usual chatterboxes, the ones that always pop into every awards show thread to talk about how they dont care about awards shows, are in here whining, crying and pissing their pants because those people won an award
there are nearly 3 billion users on youtubeHey, how's it going, I'll be showing up ahead of schedule.
Coogler is one of the most overrated directors alive, I've said that in past threads, and it's only a testament to how emaciated prestige filmmaking is when it comes to ideas today that it's getting this many nominations. Nevertheless, while I think this film is overrated, it's at least interesting. It's unpredictable. It's ambitious. It's bold.
But FYI, Petey, the war is over, and my side won. The Oscars has become so marginalized as a beacon of mainstream culture that it can't even stay on network television. It's been banished to the Cable TV of today. I'm guessing you missed this headline:
The Oscars will abandon broadcast TV for YouTube starting in 2029
YouTube TV, specifically, the expensive subscription service ($83/mo) which is one of the few services-- like Fubo-- that has arisen to supplant what used to be Cable television subscriptions with premium Live TV coverage. YouTube TV currently boasts around 10m subscribers. This is a pitiful slice of the American population, which is roughly 350m, presently, and past viewership numbers have included counts of non-Americans like Canadians, too (2024 drew 4.5m Canadian viewers).
That's because the viewership chart looks like this:
![]()
Not in the USA. Again, the broadcast will be on YouTube TV.there are nearly 3 billion users on youtube
This reminds me of hardcore henry great theater movie awful on a tv.Way better in theaters it translates poorly to tvs. Zootopia 2 was captivating in both formats.
no, it’s going to be streaming live on YouTube worldwide. you won’t need a YoutubeTV subscription to watch it.Not in the USA. Again, the broadcast will be on YouTube TV.
That is their premium subscription service starting at $83/mo standard rates (after promotional periods end).
![]()
YouTube TV - Watch & DVR Live Sports, Shows & News
Stream live TV from ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, ESPN & popular cable networks in English and Spanish. Record without DVR storage space limits. Try it free. Cancel anytime.tv.youtube.com
no, it’s going to be streaming live on YouTube worldwide. you won’t need a YoutubeTV subscription to watch it.
The Oscars, including red carpet coverage, behind-the-scenes content, Governors Ball access, and more, will be available live and for free to over 2 billion viewers around the world on YouTube, and to YouTube TV subscribers in the United States. YouTube will help make the Oscars accessible to the Academy’s growing global audience through features such as closed captioning and audio tracks available in multiple languages.
oh, Mick, you goose. that’s just saying viewers in the US will also have the option to watch it on YoutubeTV if they are a subscriber. a subscription to YoutubeTV will not be required to watch the Oscars live, however.
THE ACADEMY PARTNERS WITH YOUTUBE FOR EXCLUSIVE GLOBAL RIGHTS TO THE OSCARS® AND OTHER ACADEMY CONTENT STARTING IN 2029
THE ACADEMY PARTNERS WITH YOUTUBE FOR EXCLUSIVE GLOBAL RIGHTS TO THE OSCARS® AND OTHER ACADEMY CONTENT STARTING IN 2029press.oscars.org
Alright, if so, I stand corrected, and that's a departure from the intent signaled in the WSJ article I read last year.oh, Mick, you goose. that’s just saying viewers in the US will also have the option to watch it on YoutubeTV if they are a subscriber. a subscription to YoutubeTV will not be required to watch the Oscars live, however.
the wording in the Academy press release is trash, but there is clarification in some of the reports on Youtube’s acquisition.Alright, if so, I stand corrected, and that's a departure from the intent signaled in the WSJ article I read last year.
YouTube reaches over 2 billion viewers globally. While that doesn’t mean a quarter of the world’s population will be watching the Academy Awards by the end of the 2020s, it does mean that for the first time in the show’s history it’ll be accessible to that many people without charge. This includes viewers in the U.S. whether they have a YouTube TV subscription or not.
The Academy Awards will stream for free worldwide on YouTube, in addition to YouTube TV subscribers. It will be available with audio tracks in many languages, in addition to closed captioning.
article title said:The Oscars Moving to YouTube Beginning in 2029, Will Stream Free Worldwide