- Joined
- Jan 14, 2006
- Messages
- 27,301
- Reaction score
- 6,762
You don't know anything about me except my join date and the fact that I don't agree with your use of the word technical.
Yes, I know. I didn't say anything about the way you talk or dress or walk. I commented on what you posted.
Don't strawman me.
I didn't. I criticized what you said.
Obviously, Wanderlei was not an unskilled bum
But he's bum enough to get an "LOL" from Sir Strikes A Lot on Sherdog?
he simply was not 'a technical striker' (in my definition of the term: technically outstanding).
"Technical" and "technically outstanding" are worlds apart. You're operating with a definition that's not only idiosyncratic but heterodox.
While not technical
See? No strawmanning here. You're saying that Wand was "not technical." That's an absurd statement, and it doesn't get less absurd when you make up your own definition of technical to mean the absolute most technically outstanding .000000001% as determined by you. Surely you can see why someone would take exception to your bizarrely hyperbolic statements.