- Joined
- Nov 28, 2005
- Messages
- 18,704
- Reaction score
- 2,079
So My Heritage DNA matched me with an aunt listed in my family tree even though she's not a blood relative. It lists me as 80% celtic 15% norse and 5% middle east. Seems accurate but I given the above result feel maybe I shouldn't have given my ethnicity.
My true Ancestry team matched me with a lot of of Celtic nobles (it does that) and some English nobility, but didn't actually match me with the only Celtic royal house we know we're related to. It also didn't match me with anyone of the same name even though there are only 40 people on earth with my surname and they are mostly based in the same location in the UK. I'm not sure I can trust the results as being nothing more than using the info I gave it because I purposely omitted some stuff to see.
If you have your DNA file already you can upload it on My True Ancestry Team for free and you get your results within 10 mins. It compares your DNA to archeological findings. Both finding on my end totally missed Yorkshire and Dublin where most of them are based. The ones below shows ties to royalty.
I thought the middle eastern link was interesting because there is a theory that Irish culture originally came from the middle east. Irish is the only language with the same structure as Arabic and Jewish, and there are strong cultural similarities to middle east traditions such as Ba'al worship. The route displayed on My Heritage map indicates a middle-east>Nordic>Scotland pattern which matches the theory that the Scottish Picts were original mid easterns who traveled via northern European route to Britain.
View attachment 975658
Gaelic is similar to the Iberian Celtic language compared to any other mainland Celtic language (they are also the most similar on some levels genetically speaking to people in northern Spain and Portugal), so there's more likely any similarities due to Moor invasions of Spain and Spain still having more Celtic language influences in their language then and then the Moors possibly taking back some of that with them, but I doubt that's the case. There's not really any known real historical or genetic basis for those old stories of the Picts coming from the middle east or the Irish-Arabic connection, a lot of that is a couple of theories/tales from well after the early history periods that just got became carried down; usually early Catholics wanting to establish a historical connection tot he holy lands. It's fun to think about but from all I've ever read it's just not likely at all. The closest thing would be the northwestern African Berbers (mainly Morocco area) had higher concentrations of the Rhesus Negative blood group and higher concentrations of green and blue eyes and red hair compared to most, but that has since dwindled a bit with more Arabic genes being introduced (though still higher than other north Africans).
I could be wrong, but this is what I've gathered.