Social Even Democrats now agree : No Russian Collusion

[Strychnine]

What you are saying doesn’t make sense

Comey said he wasn't being investigated and President Trump fired him for "This whole Russia thing."

 

[Strychnine]

How could it considered the concern wasnt paid for until someone realized she may lose to him...

Life is like that sometimes. Somedays you get the Bear, somedays the Bear gets you.

 

[grizzard2bid]

Are you asking me for evidence to convict him of crimes or are you really unaware of what he's been doing for his entire career?

So his entire career he's been this vile criminal and only in 2019 it caught up to him?
He's not a rich man. I guess the crime of being an investigative journalist doesn't pay.

 

[andnowweknow]

this could not be any more obvious or true.

Did many people lie to a Republican lead Congress investigation - YES. Many like Don Trump Jr have admitted the lie to the media in their backtracking.

But the Republican lead Congress investigation said they did not have evidence of lies. Well that is because they refused to ask or look. They said they were pursuing other priorities.

Now a Dem lead Congress investigation will look and ask under oath. They will expose the many liars because they changed the scope and focus and LOOKED.

So was Don Jr not a liar prior when it was a Repub Congress and now suddenly he is? NO. He was always a liar but one side (Repubs) made sure by controlling the scope they did not look. So they could then report 'we have seen on evidence...'.

LOL at anyone stupid enough to think that is proof of anything. Proof that Don JR did not lie when we know he did.

Nobody disagrees with this. They just dont care in deference to the perceived "leftists". Really they are just mad at a few dozen vocal fat angry lesbians...because deep down that's what they are.

 

[SurferH2O]

Yes. He literally worked in concert with the Russians in Ukraine in much the same capacity. If you believe the reports that he offered private briefings and campaign data, and that the Russians conducted a misinformation campaign against Hillary, then it seems to be a pretty solid "gotcha". It doesn't directly incriminate Trump but it would be "collusion".

"Collusion" is not against the law. There is a reason why the Mainstream Media and Democrats use that word. It's for the "Useful Idiots" to grasp onto and repeat. The crime is "Conspiracy" and while there is zero evidence of even "Collusion", a much much lower standard, there is NOTHING on "Conspiracy" which is what would be required for a broken law.

There was no "Collusion".

 

[JamesRussler]

I never said I had faith in Mueller, or trusted him. I said he will be the one to end the investigation. Period.

Stop trolling, thanks.

I wasn't trolling.

 

[andnowweknow]

So his entire career he's been this vile criminal and only in 2019 it caught up to him?
He's not a rich man. I guess the crime of being an investigative journalist doesn't pay.

Do we really have to do this dance just to be on opposite teams? He was in the same law firm as Manafort and he's been doing the exact same white collar criminal shit for just as long. He's a liar by nature, a conman and generally a vile human who takes publicly vocalized pride in ruining people.

 

[andnowweknow]

I wasn't trolling.

Yes you were.

 

[SurferH2O]

You got that wrong little buddy. The screaming face of defeat is the ones celebrating the Senate investigation as some binding win controlling what Mueller will report when it does no such thing.

Ask yourself why a Republican lead Congress could not find or prove so many witnesses lied to them when everyone else could see it?

Answer: They limited the scope and refused to call them back and question them. They were happy to let many get away with lying to Congress for partisan reasons. And yes, it would be appropriate to say to that point that the Republican lead Congress did not have direct evidence of them lying. Why? Because they made sure not ask or look.

Only you do not understand the liars were not innocent when Repub's were in power and guilty now that Dem's have control. They were ALWAYS guilty of lying. One party just made sure to control the scope to not look at the evidence.

You keep rockin that tinfoil hat... it's fun to watch you hope for this conspiracy to be true.

 

[grizzard2bid]

Do we really have to do this dance just to be on opposite teams? He was in the same law firm as Manafort and he's been doing the exact same white collar criminal shit for just as long. He's a liar by nature, a conman and generally a vile human who takes publicly vocalized pride in ruining people.

Which people did he ruin? Dude, you're leveling some serious charges but at least name a specific you didn't overhear on MSNBC special.

 

[JamesRussler]

Yes you were.

You and Fogie are clearly very emotional about this. I understand, this is a tough time for you. But disparaging me as a troll is not the answer.

 

[JamesRussler]

Why?

The Left believes Roger Stone is guilty of colluding with Donald Trump to help him win the Presidency—an unforgivable crime.

 

[MikeMcMann]

"Collusion" is not against the law. There is a reason why the Mainstream Media and Democrats use that word. It's for the "Useful Idiots" to grasp onto and repeat. The crime is "Conspiracy" and while there is zero evidence of even "Collusion", a much much lower standard, there is NOTHING on "Conspiracy" which is what would be required for a broken law.

There was no "Collusion".

No the crimes being investigate are 'links and coordination' between the Trump campaign, Trump and Russia.

You guys need to go read the Mueller mandate or STFU.

'Leaks and Coordination' fall under the umbrella term of collusion. They are the elements of the crime.

So colluding is not the crime but the elements you will be charged with are the leaks and coordination. And so far Mueller has already got guilty findings and pleas from many in Trumps Campaign for just that. His investigation so far has been more successful than I think anyone expected.

 

[MikeMcMann]

You keep rockin that tinfoil hat... it's fun to watch you hope for this conspiracy to be true.

There is not a word of conspiracy in that. Just facts. You know those things Trumpsters hate and ignore.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

"Collusion" is not against the law. There is a reason why the Mainstream Media and Democrats use that word. It's for the "Useful Idiots" to grasp onto and repeat. The crime is "Conspiracy" and while there is zero evidence of even "Collusion", a much much lower standard, there is NOTHING on "Conspiracy" which is what would be required for a broken law.

There was no "Collusion".

I'll bet you don't work in the legal system in any way.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

You keep rockin that tinfoil hat... it's fun to watch you hope for this conspiracy to be true.

I'm just afraid of all the ugly faces we'll have around here when some of you guys pull your heads out of your asses.

 

[JamesRussler]

I'll bet you don't work in the legal system in any way.

I do. He's correct.

 

[Fugazy]

I’ll wait for the report but the odds of trump being sophisticated enough to rig the election with Russian help? I mean come on

You're forgetting the narrative was that he was so dumb and weak that Putin made him into his pawn so he could influence the US.

That was a good one.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

I do. He's correct.

That there's no evidence for conspiracy?

 

[JamesRussler]

That there's no evidence for conspiracy?

Everything he said was correct, particularly regarding Democrats' use of the word "collusion" to avoid accusing Trump of a "conspiracy" with Russia.