ESPN Pound For Pound Rankings

Shoemaker

****INSIDIOUS****
Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
17,253
Reaction score
4,112
Not biased at all
 
Loma should not be 1
It is kind of weird how such an incredible talent can still be so grossly overrated....


And at the same time we have that Roy Jones thread saying he's overrated....
 
Idk how crawford is above canelo.


Extremely talented, but he doesn't have the resume canelo does.

I'd put canelo above both loma and crawford.
 
Top 4 P4P: Combined Record Last 5 Opponents
RECORD WIN PCT
Canelo Alvarez 171-6-2 .955
Terence Crawford 119-5-1 .952
Naoya Inoue 126-8-3 .920
Vasiliy Lomachenko 140-12-3 .903
 
Weird that their top 2 p4p also have exclusive contracts with ESPN.
 
Idk how crawford is above canelo.


Extremely talented, but he doesn't have the resume canelo does.

I'd put canelo above both loma and crawford.
I don't get how Crawford is on there at all, really.
 
I’m not really a fan, but Canelo is #1 and it’s clear.
 
Wack ass list, Crawford hasn’t fought anyone. Naoya is okay him and Spence are tied based on resume Spence beat Porter but it’s not like he’s cleaned the whole division.

I think 1. Canelo 2. Loma, Inoue & Spence should be above Crawford based on recent wins. That shit comes from me and im a fan of the guy and pick him to beat Spence.
 
Good, looks like most voters aren't impressed by Canelo fighting nursing home residents. Dan Rafael, however, would gladly jack off Fury and Canelo at the same time.
 
Good, looks like most voters aren't impressed by Canelo fighting nursing home residents. Dan Rafael, however, would gladly jack off Fury and Canelo at the same time.
Jorge Linares and Lamont Peterson though, now those are the guys that make a fighter's resume great.
 
ESPN never had good boxing rankings. Ring Magazine and BoxRec are the only places to check if you’re interested in rankings.
 
Wtf has Crawford done again?
 
Back
Top