- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
- Messages
- 25,049
- Reaction score
- 7,712
No, it's the definition for the English language use of the word.that is not the definition proposed in the genocide convention, which is the first and only regulatory system for genocide.
No, it's the definition for the English language use of the word.that is not the definition proposed in the genocide convention, which is the first and only regulatory system for genocide.
the word was invented by raphael lemkin who made the genocide convention. i don't really care what anyone else has to say about it. yes, in most contexts it involves mass murder, but that's not the only criteria.No, it's the definition for the English language use of the word.
oh, cry me a river. you're right, rounding up undesirables in concentration camps is nothing like the holocaust. fuck outta here.what is not only fucking insane but incredibly disrespectful is comparing this to the holocaust
Lol I love how everything is fair game now besides the slightest mention of the holocaust. Deport every single brown by any means possible. But don't you fucking dare minimize, even mention, my greatest friends past.oh, cry me a river. you're right, rounding up undesirables in concentration camps is nothing like the holocaust. fuck outta here.
the word was invented by raphael lemkin who made the genocide convention. i don't really care what anyone else has to say about it. yes, in most contexts it involves mass murder, but that's not the only criteria.
you are also saying, by definition, that any jew who survived holocaust was not a victim of genocide. asinine.
what he meant was exactly what was outlined in the convention he wrote. the thing you are now saying it doesn't mean lolAnd he died 60 years ago and believed the word meant exactly what the dictionary said. Whats your point?
no, that's precisely what i'm saying.What is your second point even trying to show? Jews would still be victims because the genoicide affected them even if it didn't kill them. You're sperging now.
my argument is that the dictionary doesn't define a word better than the guy who invented the word lolYour argument is literally that the dictionary is wrong about a definition, rather than you being wrong about it.
what he meant was exactly what was outlined in the convention he wrote. the thing you are now saying it doesn't mean lol
no, that's precisely what i'm saying.
my argument is that the dictionary doesn't define a word better than the guy who invented the word lol
oh make no mistake, i already did. i would rather abide by the definition of the guy who invented the word.Just say you think the dictionary definition of the word is wrong. That's what you think. Own it.
oh, cry me a river. you're right, rounding up undesirables in concentration camps is nothing like the holocaust. fuck outta here.
Ok, cool.oh make no mistake, i already did. i would rather abide by the definition of the guy who invented the word.
so only until that starts happening can we be worried about the potential of that happening someday? we can't follow the steps of how that society came to be and the things that led to it?Unless they are gassing them and then running them through an oven until they are ash or shooting them and dumping them in shallow graves then your point is just a dishonest smear.
yeah my work here is done.Ok, cool.
(FYI, the word cool is meant to refer to temperature. Thats how the person who invented it defined it. I used it wrong)
surely you can post videos of all of those occurrences in the top row and they will look just like this next to hitler.
so no you can't post videos of those gestures to show they look like elon's?
EDIT: OBVIOUS SARCASM WARNINGso no you can't post videos of those gestures to show they look like elon's?
If you truly think that was a legit nazi salute and it concerns you, it's time to look within and admit the real truth...so no you can't post videos of those gestures to show they look like elon's?
Virtually identical...