• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Elizabeth Warren likely is running for President

I'd also like to point out the Hillary likely was given all the debate questions in every debate in advance.

I doubt it. She's a seasoned politician. She knows how to debate, and most have an idea about the questions they'll be asked anyways. They do hours and hours of prep with folks who more or less know what to expect. The questions rarely come out of left field. It wasn't her first rodeo, and she came across as a typical politician, with typical politician answers.
 
Do you think Ford's a better source than Sinclair? I think most would say 'yes'. Then there's the fact that the two accusations are quite a bit different in nature. Accusing the president of the US to be a homosexual cocaine user who paid (or was paid) for gay sex is quite a few notches above accusing someone of frat boy behaviour that wasn't far outside the norm at the time. Do I believe that Kavanaugh should have been blocked because of one accusation of improper behaviour when he was in high school for which there is no evidence other than the accuser's word? No. Do I believe that one's more likely to be true than Obama's was a gay prostitute? Yes.

Just a FTR - Sinclair didn't claim either he or Obama were prostitutes. And that gay choir director's mom said she thought he was killed to keep Obama's secret.

Btw, didn't Obama spend a couple weeks with some gay guys right after he left office? Just sayin....
 
I don't think that particular theory was debunked. It wasn't even a theory. It was an accusation. An accusation that had just as much evidence backing it up as Christine Blasey Ford's, yet y'all seemed to believe that one.
Sinclair is 100x more credible than Blasey Ford. Specific times, dates and events were given, unlike Blasey Fraud being paraded out in front of the world in their sweaty desperation to ruin Kav.
Beyond Sinclair's credibility, there are tons of other pieces of circumstantial evidence that Obama was a raving homosexual.
 
I can’t wait until Kamala executes her for being minority status at Harvard.


I already have my popcorn waiting.



It will be one swift blow which will end her campaign.

<{jackyeah}>
 
How about a Liberal political activist? That doesn't go down as well as "professor" does it?

Regardless, you don't judge the stories on the merits of the people telling them. You judge them on their own merit. Both stories are unverifiable at best, and complete bullshit at worst, based on what we know of them. Shit, you could argue Ford's is actually less believable due to her tripping over details of it, and some elements being refuted by her own witnesses.

Oddly, reporters tried to verify what little there was to Ford's story. And said she should be believed even though they couldn't prove a bit of it.

But do you member that time a guy said he got high with Obama and gave him a hummer and all the papers went and asked his alleged witnesses before calling him a liar?

Me neither
.
 
The dimocrats are going to be too busy eating themselves alive to win any elections any time soon. It's been a joy watching the Balkanization of the dimmocratic party.
 
Sinclair is 100x more credible than Blasey Ford. Specific times, dates and events were given, unlike Blasey Fraud being paraded out in front of the world in their sweaty desperation to ruin Kav.
Beyond Sinclair's credibility, there are tons of other pieces of circumstantial evidence that Obama was a raving homosexual.


Judo throw pic.


Enough said.
 
She's brought it up multiple times, and has used it to her advantage. You really think Trump dug deep into her records to point out his criticism of her using it? LOL.

For fuck's sake, her ridiculous DNA test was another example of her trying to use it for political points.

Get a clue.

If leftists had a clue, they wouldn’t be leftists.
 
He will eat her alive. Her brand is destroyed.

Again displaying your profound political ignorance. Warren's "brand" is consumer protection and banking regulation.

She only got tied to the identity politics bullshit by the right when they outted her in a political attack as someone who claimed distant Native ancestry in her life as a private citizen.
 
Psalm 137: 9, homes.

A- it doesn't tell anyone to do it. B- where at all does God say for the chosen to do it? But I imagine you already knew differently:

7Remember, Lord, what the Edomites did on the day Jerusalem fell. “Tear it down,” they cried, “tear it down to it foundations"

8 Daughter Babylon, doomed to destruction, happy is the one who repays you according to what you have done to us

9 Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks
 
The native thing was REALLY silly but she has a good voting record on a lot of domestic issues which is my main concern (although she voted for Trump's military increase, which is concerning). That said, if her and Sanders are in the primary I'm going Sanders. If she wins, she'll have my vote. If Sanders wins I think the likelihood is high that she'll be his VP.

Comparing her to Hillary is absurd, she's waaaaaaaay way way way waaay better than Hillary.

Biden is a joke. He's not winning anything. The only chance any corporate Dem has in the primary is if they lie their asses off to appeal to naive progressives and/or rig it again. If they're successful, Trump will annihilate them in the general. I suspect Trump will be difficult in the general even for an actual progressive.
 
A- it doesn't tell anyone to do it. B- where at all does God say for the chosen to do it? But I imagine you already knew differently:

7Remember, Lord, what the Edomites did on the day Jerusalem fell. “Tear it down,” they cried, “tear it down to it foundations"

8 Daughter Babylon, doomed to destruction, happy is the one who repays you according to what you have done to us

9 Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks

Sounds like they have some grievances, and are speaking about how they will kill babies....
 
Again displaying your profound political ignorance. Warren's "brand" is consumer protection and banking regulation.

She only got tied to the identity politics bullshit by the right when they outted her in a political attack as someone who claimed distant Native ancestry in her life as a private citizen.
Thank you, person who actually pays attention to substance.
 
Perhaps I'm misremembering, but weren't Powell and Rice called Uncle Tom?
I don't recall but what does that have anything to do with Trump using Pocahantas as a slur? Native American groups are critical of a noted figure in their culture being used as a racial slur / a demeaning term.
 
I don't recall but what does that have anything to do with Trump using Pocahantas as a slur? Native American groups are critical of a noted figure in their culture being used as a racial slur / a demeaning term.

I guess my point is why would you expect Trump not to use racial denigration when despite the feigned outrage the other side has done it for years.
 
Back
Top