Electrical current lost per volume of water?

[Prefect]

I recently found some videos on YT where a guy claims to have figured out magnetism and he claims magnetism and electro magnetic fields do not work the way we are taught. Dude claims gravity is bullshit and does not exist. He says everything in the observable universe can be explained by his electro-magnetic theory. And I gotta admit, the guy seems extremely intelligent and proves everything he talks about.

He also proved that the gravitational waves that scientists think they detected recently, are not caused from gravity but from electro magnetic distortion. And no bullshit he duplicates exactly what they found, using a magnet and a old cathode ray tv set.

There are an infinite number of ways to explain anything. Maybe, with magnets I use another concept I'll call drumpfs instead of the concept of magnetic flux. And let's say that with both I get a result that matches what I see in lab. Which is more correct? Well, only one of the two is congruent with other theories and provides understanding beyond that specific experiment. So, to say a person has some ideas how to describe something with different concepts that are verfitable in a lab, doesn't mean he is right or more right and could be more wrong. A model or concept is more right if it extends understanding.

 

[CatchOmega]

Is anyone else worried that OP is planning the old toaster in the tub suicide attempt?

We're here for you bro, don't do it.

 

[Kick Strickland]

There are an infinite number of ways to explain anything. Maybe, with magnets I use another concept I'll call drumpfs instead of the concept of magnetic flux. And let's say that with both I get a result that matches what I see in lab. Which is more correct? Well, only one of the two is congruent with other theories and provides understanding beyond that specific experiment. So, to say a person has some ideas how to describe something with different concepts that are verfitable in a lab, doesn't mean he is right or more right and could be more wrong. A model or concept is more right if it extends understanding.

I agree completely on the infinite ways of understanding everything. But this guy has great points about Einstein's gravity and "fabric of space time" concepts being so wrong that you have to create imaginary shit that doesn't really exist, like dark matter, to get it to fit observations.

He explains his electromagnetic universe theory and it fits absolutely everything that is observable in the universe, which is crazy when you think about it. It fits better than Einstein's concepts. He says guys like Tesla and Farraday had it figured out a long time ago. And to hear him explain it, it does make a lot of sense.

I'm trashed right now and don't think I'm making much sense btw, lol. Sorry bout that

 

[Taboo]

Is anyone else worried that OP is planning the old toaster in the tub suicide attempt?

We're here for you bro, don't do it.

LOL!! No chance!

 

[Taboo]

There are an infinite number of ways to explain anything. Maybe, with magnets I use another concept I'll call drumpfs instead of the concept of magnetic flux. And let's say that with both I get a result that matches what I see in lab. Which is more correct? Well, only one of the two is congruent with other theories and provides understanding beyond that specific experiment. So, to say a person has some ideas how to describe something with different concepts that are verfitable in a lab, doesn't mean he is right or more right and could be more wrong. A model or concept is more right if it extends understanding.

So what you're saying is that todays science will only be accepted if it fits a certain story line? And that it's dependant on how an experiment is conducted?

 

[Madmick]

Because of resistance you get voltage drop. Same thing with copper.

Yeah, you've wondered into a grand idea of the universe-- that's for sure. Impedance/Resistance.

And yes, there are other geeks who think about this stuff. We call them physicists, and they are super fucking useful. They're goddamn Jedi as far as I'm concerned.

 

[Prefect]

So what you're saying is that todays science will only be accepted if it fits a certain story line? And that it's dependant on how an experiment is conducted?

Yes, unless there is reason for it not to. Newtonian physics works well enough in most applications. Relativistic physics came along and explained stuff that Newtonian physics couldn't. Did we throw away our Newton stuff? No but we know it won't be exact especially for things moving fast. So, you have two branches that people pick and choose to work from depending on their problem.

 

[west42]

Does anyone else's mind start to wander and ask weird questions of the universe? LOL!!!

Water is a conductor of electricity. How much current is lost in relation to the volume of water?

For example; if your hand was in a bucket of water and you tased the water, would you get shocked?

What if the bucket was 10x the volume?

Google didn't help.

5