Election Officials from Both Parties In Every State: "No Fraud"

Whippy McGee said:
Next? You didn't read through it. How did the thousands of votes Time Travel? They were received before they were sent. That's an amazing feat!

You dismissing this, because that's what you want the world to be is intellectually dishonest.

Next?
Click to expand...
What the fuck are you talking about? In the image you shared, none of the "returned" dates are before the "mailed" dates.
 
Madmick said:
I like how "implausible" turned into "impossible".

For all I know these were citizens who received their ballot, filled it out immediately, and dropped it off at the city hall (to save time standing in line at the post office) where the government workers filed the turn-in date, and forwarded the mail (or simply retained it if that was the location for it to be counted later).

Spoiler alert: tomorrow morning won't smell like napalm, or any morning thereafter. Wake up and smell the defeat.
Click to expand...

Nice try, but I am going to have to fail you on reading comprehension and simple Math.

How did thousands get received before they were mailed as well? Just because you want to up highly improbable scenarios for the other ballots, you can't explain away the Time Traveling ballots.
 
Overtures said:
I guess you’re not figuring in how the split ticket outcome of PA down ballot votes kind of take the wind out of the fraud sails....
Click to expand...

You didn't read the data or the link. This has nothing about the who voted for who. It has to do with the inability of ballots to Time Travel. Thousands were received before they were mailed. Thousands more were received in ZERO days. Thousands more were received in 1 day. That means the whole process is not reliable. We should have never forced in UN-REQUESTED Mail In Ballots so late in the game without the infrastructure, safeguards, and chain of custody safeguards in place. The Democrats forced a system on Americans that failed us.
 
Whippy McGee said:
So? I just provided the data that shows ballots Time Traveled. You have zero to debunk that fact.
Click to expand...

Do you not trust the Republican election officials that control the process in the entire state of PA?

Do you know that Republicans control the state legislature and election process in every contested swing state except Nevada?

Are you alleging that Republican state legislatures worked with Democrats to rig the election against Trump but none of the other GOP candidates down ballot?
 
Whippy McGee said:
Can you share with us how thousands of ballots in Pennsylvania Time Traveled to be received before they were mailed?
Click to expand...

Is time travel the only explanation? How come none of the elections officials in PA have said there was a problem?
 
HomeCheese said:
Is time travel the only explanation? How come none of the elections officials in PA have said there was a problem?
Click to expand...

Yeah? Hello? That is a good question. The data is clear.

It was either (A) Time Travel, or (B) the Data is not reliable. Which means, the Pennsylvania process failed their voters. There is no way to accurately access if the votes were legitimate and legal. This should never be the case and the uncurious nature of our "Free Press" is alarming.
 
Whippy McGee said:
Yeah? Hello? That is a good question. The data is clear.

It was either (A) Time Travel, or (B) the Data is not reliable. Which means, the Pennsylvania process failed their voters. There is no way to accurately access if the votes were legitimate and legal. This should never be the case and the uncurious nature of our "Free Press" is alarming.
Click to expand...


Where are the PA officials on this issue?
 
There's this thing that's happened semi-recently where people accept explainations and "debunking" by the very same people or groups who are intimately involved with any potential issues as if their confirmation bias is satiated so look no further...

But hey, nevermind! The new york times contacted election officials! They're official so don't worry...
 
Whippy McGee said:
Yeah? Hello? That is a good question. The data is clear.

It was either (A) Time Travel, or (B) the Data is not reliable. Which means, the Pennsylvania process failed their voters. There is no way to accurately access if the votes were legitimate and legal. This should never be the case and the uncurious nature of our "Free Press" is alarming.
Click to expand...
Once again, where in the document that you posted to you see a "returned" date before a "mailed" date? What the are you looking at???
 
Whippy McGee said:
Yeah? Hello? That is a good question. The data is clear.

It was either (A) Time Travel, or (B) the Data is not reliable. Which means, the Pennsylvania process failed their voters. There is no way to accurately access if the votes were legitimate and legal. This should never be the case and the uncurious nature of our "Free Press" is alarming.
Click to expand...
Or C) a perfectly rational explanation, like for literally everything else so far.
 
Rational Poster said:
Do you not trust the Republican election officials that control the process in the entire state of PA?

Do you know that Republicans control the state legislature and election process in every contested swing state except Nevada?

Are you alleging that Republican state legislatures worked with Democrats to rig the election against Trump but none of the other GOP candidates down ballot?
Click to expand...
tenor.gif
 
luckyshot said:
The NYT contacted election officials from both parties in every state in the election, and not a single one of them supported President Trump's claim that there were any significant irregularities, never mind fraud, in the 2020 election.

  • “There’s a great human capacity for inventing things that aren’t true about elections,” said Frank LaRose, a Republican who serves as Ohio’s secretary of state. “The conspiracy theories and rumors and all those things run rampant. For some reason, elections breed that type of mythology.”
  • “Kansas did not experience any widespread, systematic issues with voter fraud, intimidation, irregularities or voting problems,” a spokeswoman for Scott Schwab, the Republican secretary of state in Kansas, said in an email Tuesday. “We are very pleased with how the election has gone up to this point.”
  • Nellie Gorbea, the Democratic secretary of state in Rhode Island, said the amount of attention on the election would make illegal voting extremely difficult. “It would be nearly impossible to do voter fraud in this election because of the number of people tuned in,” she said.
  • “Many of the claims against the commonwealth have already been dismissed, and repeating these false attacks is reckless,” said Jacklin Rhoads, a spokeswoman for Josh Shapiro, a Democrat who is Pennsylvania’s attorney general. “No active lawsuit even alleges, and no evidence presented so far has shown, widespread problems.”
  • ‘‘We have not seen any evidence of fraud or foul play in the actual administration of the election,’’ said Jake Rollow, a spokesman for Jocelyn Benson, the Democratic secretary of state in Michigan. “What we have seen is that it was smooth, transparent, secure and accurate.’’
Some states described small problems common to all elections, which they said they were addressing: a few instances of illegal or double voting, some technical glitches and some minor errors in math. Officials in all states are conducting their own review of the voting — a standard component of the certification process.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/...action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage
Click to expand...

Good for the NY Times, and good for those election officials in being crystal clear in their responses. But it shouldn't take any of that.

It would be impossible to commit the type of fraud needed to steel this election. Yes some of those states are close. But what is even being suggested, here?

Let's take Georgia even. Biden doesn't even need Georgia, and Georgia is crazy close. So you have fewer than 15,000 votes separating Biden and Trump. Doesn't seem like a crazy number of votes to tamper with, right? Until you start looking at the logistics:

1. Where do you dump 15,000 ballots? Seems it would be tough to dump them all at once. So you need collusion across a few regions. The people in collusion need to be highly competent to get their scheme past poll watchers, and they need to be trustworthy beyond all measure, because people are going to be investigating, and there are massive incentives to blow it all up as a whistle blower.

2. But the real trick here, is how in hell do you coordinate to just squeak by with less than 1% of the vote? Are we suggesting that the vote was heavily in favour of Trump and the fixers somehow, in real time, snuck in a couple of hundred thousand votes, tracking along the way with each other and the real vote, so that they could manage to just squeak it out?

3. Or are we suggesting that the vote was a virtual tie, and that the Dems then invented 20,000 votes out of this air to tip it to Biden. In which case I'm confused how you could believe the vote could be a virtual tie in favour of Trump by a few thousand votes, but could not have possibly started as a virtual tie in favour of Biden by under 15,000 votes.

4. Repeat all of the above in three or four other states.

The results being what they are there's no realistic scenario for widespread fraud that makes sense.
 
Last edited:
Grenz said:
Or C) a perfectly rational explanation, like for literally everything else so far.
Click to expand...

Tell us what hypothetical situation works for votes received before they were sent? Time travel? I am sure there some some "perfectly rational explanation" for that happening thousands of times.

<YeahOKJen>
 
Whippy McGee said:
Tell us what hypothetical situation works for votes received before they were sent? Time travel? I am sure there some some "perfectly rational explanation" for that happening thousands of times.

<YeahOKJen>
Click to expand...
You’re right, the chance that some grand conspiracy has been uncovered here is far more likely.
<YeahOKJen>
 
Here is another 34,000+ votes that defy logic with a same day Ballot Mailed and Returned date.

Data2-1200x655.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,086
Messages
55,466,710
Members
174,786
Latest member
plasterby

Share this page

Back
Top