Elections Election Fraud update V.2 - more evidence?

So they're basically retracting everything they said or insinuated about election fraud.

Does it even matter that they're trying to right their wrong? They've already poisoned the minds of their viewers.

A comment from the tweet:

It's like a grocer knowingly selling poisoned food. Customers buy it, eat it, get sick. Then grocer says, "Oh yeah, that food was bad."

Doesn't matter. The damage is done.
 
They aren't trying to right anything. Just give themselves legal cover.

And I'm pretty sure they're failing.

A qualified clarification after the fact doesn't change what they did or how they expressed it, and I'm pretty sure it can be successfully argued that it doesn't significantly diminish the damages done by weeks of promoting slanderous attacks.
 
This is your wild internet fantasy, nothing more than a substitute for real victory.
You wouldn’t know what a victory looked like. You keep thinking cases being thrown out of court is a good thing.
 
This isn’t just about smarttec and you subconsciously know it. Dominion is also mentioned. What you are purposely avoiding is that these news outlets purposely mislead you.

I don't follow those news agencies though, or any in general. I mostly spend my time watching documentaries etc, rather than following news. I posted actual live feeds of various hearings, etc. Including the one with the Dominion CEO.

I don't watch news outlets for the most part, since they generally are manipulative, on both sides, and sensationalize for ratings. That is why I try to stick with primary sources, such as the live feeds from congressional hearings, legal hearings, etc. Or tweets with actual legal documents.
 
Not too familiar with Lin Wood, and he seems a bit of a nut. But this legal response is pretty funny




Eps6acEXEAMvInY

Lin is a clout chasing grifter there is not a single high profile case he would turn down if it means his name will be in the news. He has got jack shit for the smirk kid and lost a case where musk called a guy a :eek::eek::eek::eek:
 
I don't follow those news agencies though, or any in general. I mostly spend my time watching documentaries etc, rather than following news. I posted actual live feeds of various hearings, etc. Including the one with the Dominion CEO.

I don't watch news outlets for the most part, since they generally are manipulative, on both sides, and sensationalize for ratings. That is why I try to stick with primary sources, such as the live feeds from congressional hearings, legal hearings, etc. Or tweets with actual legal documents.
bullshit. If you are so "fair and balanced" why are you posting 100% alternative reality right wing nut job CT's non-stop?
 
I’m glad you acknowledge your TDS. The irony is cute coming from the same lunatics that lead a failed shampeachment entirely on fake whistleblowers yet still believe Trump was guilty.
Trump fans be like “couldn’t build a wall, couldn’t imprison Hillary, debt out of control, impeached, one term loser, aaaaarrrggghhh”
YearlySpecificArawana-size_restricted.gif


People who love America be like
tenor.gif
 
I check back here every few days. Have the chuds found any evidence yet?

No, but Trump is trying to figure out how to grant legal immunity to MBS over an assassination plot to kill Saad Aljabri, a former Saudi counterterrorism leader and longtime U.S. intelligence ally now living in exile in Canada
 
show me a post where I did.

V1

"
well, IMO the hearing today went as well as it could have.

Problem is a lot of this has not gotten any coverage by MSM. After today, with several good sound bites, attention will be brought. This is not just Trump now and his team, it members of the national Senate, not just insignificant, states as before (where one state wont change anything). Now you have senators, some long term, well respected, giving credence to all this, and support this process. Those state hearings don't get on C-SPAN, this does.

They mentioned like 85-90% of republicans believe in fraud. Now they say 15%+ democrats also are coming around.

Keep in mind... to object to electoral college vote, you only need 1 Senator and 1 house rep to object. They already have a "fake" electoral college vote in several states that voted for Trump instead of Biden. Pence and the House can recognize this.

This all started just 3 weeks ago this Friday with the PA press conference with Rudy and his team that kicked this all off. Since then, it is covered on Fox News every night with their 3 main shows (Tucker, Hannity, Ingram).

They have 3 more weeks before January 6th. Multiple new subpoenas and cases form every day. Going to be a long 3 weeks.

Some good sound bites, if you missed."

V2

"
I had put some good links and info in the OP. Probably made a liberal mod queezy or something. I had already talked with a few mods about starting a new thread last week

All good though. Glad this stuff is trying to be buried to a degree/partially censored even on a karate forum. Shows the anxiety it is inducing in these sheep, which is why the liberals also hover around the thread, spamming the same stuff over and over trying to protect their fragile cognitive dissonance.

God bless America"

"even though you don't believe it, you have to put it in context with the process the GOP is trying to do, even without the support of people like Mitch (who I have always hated).

But look just here at Rep Jim Jordan. He already said he is ready to protest the electoral college vote on Jan 6. There are multiple others. Just his video on obscure news outlet, Newsmax, it has almost 500k views in less than 24 hours, his twitter feed has 100k views of his post of this segment. They just need one senator to go along and start the process on the 6th. The house is controlled by republicans on a state to state basis.

The left is going to need to at least have some counter argument, other than "oh but a judge didn't want to review the evidence, so it is proven false", if the GOP's plans go accordingly. So if it is NOT true, the left should be readily able to debunk it. It is based on raw data from the election, and I do not see anything debunking it yet (though it just came out). Just like with the NV evidence, no one has actually debunked the claims, other than a judge did not want to hear the case. Same with WI. In fact, the 3 republican justices in WI agreed with the case, which is why they had the lawyer in the senate yesterday, along with the NV lawyer."

Damn......
 
I’m glad you acknowledge your TDS. The irony is cute coming from the same lunatics that lead a failed shampeachment entirely on fake whistleblowers yet still believe Trump was guilty.
<36>
 
V1

"
well, IMO the hearing today went as well as it could have.

Problem is a lot of this has not gotten any coverage by MSM. After today, with several good sound bites, attention will be brought. This is not just Trump now and his team, it members of the national Senate, not just insignificant, states as before (where one state wont change anything). Now you have senators, some long term, well respected, giving credence to all this, and support this process. Those state hearings don't get on C-SPAN, this does.

They mentioned like 85-90% of republicans believe in fraud. Now they say 15%+ democrats also are coming around.

Keep in mind... to object to electoral college vote, you only need 1 Senator and 1 house rep to object. They already have a "fake" electoral college vote in several states that voted for Trump instead of Biden. Pence and the House can recognize this.

This all started just 3 weeks ago this Friday with the PA press conference with Rudy and his team that kicked this all off. Since then, it is covered on Fox News every night with their 3 main shows (Tucker, Hannity, Ingram).

They have 3 more weeks before January 6th. Multiple new subpoenas and cases form every day. Going to be a long 3 weeks.

Some good sound bites, if you missed."

V2

"
I had put some good links and info in the OP. Probably made a liberal mod queezy or something. I had already talked with a few mods about starting a new thread last week

All good though. Glad this stuff is trying to be buried to a degree/partially censored even on a karate forum. Shows the anxiety it is inducing in these sheep, which is why the liberals also hover around the thread, spamming the same stuff over and over trying to protect their fragile cognitive dissonance.

God bless America"

"even though you don't believe it, you have to put it in context with the process the GOP is trying to do, even without the support of people like Mitch (who I have always hated).

But look just here at Rep Jim Jordan. He already said he is ready to protest the electoral college vote on Jan 6. There are multiple others. Just his video on obscure news outlet, Newsmax, it has almost 500k views in less than 24 hours, his twitter feed has 100k views of his post of this segment. They just need one senator to go along and start the process on the 6th. The house is controlled by republicans on a state to state basis.

The left is going to need to at least have some counter argument, other than "oh but a judge didn't want to review the evidence, so it is proven false", if the GOP's plans go accordingly. So if it is NOT true, the left should be readily able to debunk it. It is based on raw data from the election, and I do not see anything debunking it yet (though it just came out). Just like with the NV evidence, no one has actually debunked the claims, other than a judge did not want to hear the case. Same with WI. In fact, the 3 republican justices in WI agreed with the case, which is why they had the lawyer in the senate yesterday, along with the NV lawyer."

Damn......


How is commenting on an actual congressional hearing (which I posted a live stream of, not some news outlet coverage), or what a congressional rep states they will do, posting a CT?

I posted a video of Jim Jordan saying he plans on doing that, as do other house reps and it seems like there are a few Senators hinting they might. How is that a fake CT? I mean, that is what you highlighted in my post... that is an objective fact. I posted a video of him stating he is going to do that.
 
How is commenting on an actual congressional hearing (which I posted a live stream of, not some news outlet coverage), or what a congressional rep states they will do, posting a CT?

I posted a video of Jim Jordan saying he plans on doing that, as do other house reps and it seems like there are a few Senators hinting they might. How is that a fake CT? I mean, that is what you highlighted in my post... that is an objective fact. I posted a video of him stating he is going to do that.
You mentioned you never watch cable TV. You just mentioned how the bogus crap was on Foxnews every day. You mention Newsmax when you claim not to watch them. You are either lying or you like to talk about shit you have no idea what you are talking about. I'm going with both here.
 
Back
Top