Elections Election Fraud update V.2 - more evidence?

BFoe said:
Lol this was addressed immediately—the next day after election night. Biden was never certified as the winner of that county, Trump was.
Click to expand...

What in the BLUE HE// are they complaining about it for?

{<BJPeen}
 


<TheDonald>
 
Last edited:
Loiosh said:
It isn't surprising at all to anyone who has had to make a case.

You have to make a simple argument and provide support in the form of evidence. The argument should never take more than a few minutes to read and digest. It can be dismissed immediately no matter what evidence is presented if no just cause exists for the argument.

Have you ever wondered what was in those 8000 pages? Do you know what argument was being made specifically and how it's supported by the evidence? Do you have any understanding of trial law?

Are you certain it isn't binders and binders of drawings of dickbutts?

Do you think the judges in more than sixty trials were all in on a conspiracy to supplant Trump? Do you think the supreme court with it's Trump appointees was in on it?

There only seems to be a few of you left. This process seems to have distilled the Trump base on Sherdog into its purest essence of crazy.
Click to expand...

They outlined it clearly in the senate hearing on Wednesday. And I also watched the court hearing when it happened. It is pretty clear what they have in there

When you have social security, driver licenses, addresses and other records for almost 100k people, the pages add up
 
Last edited:
EyeOfNewt said:
he didn’t. congress won’t certify the electoral votes. it’s already known that a vast campaign of fraud took place during the election that was allowed because state executives passed bogus laws when it really should have been a legislative matter to begin with. different set of electors have been sent by the GOP. their votes will be counted and Trump begins his second term. if there is a deadlock and no one gets to 270, states will cast a single vote and Trump wins again.
Click to expand...

No matter how many times you repeat this won’t make it any more true. The law is not on your side here. There are not dual electors so there is nothing to debate. That is the law. Come Jan 6. You’ll change your tune to something else.
 
cottagecheesefan said:
They outlined it clearly in the senate hearing on Wednesday. And I also watched the court hearing when it happened. It is pretty clear what they have in there

When you have social security, driver licenses, addresses and other records for almost 100k people, the pages add up
Click to expand...

If it's all so clear to you, a layman, why do you think it's failing in the courts? Are you smarter than them? Are they dirty? ALL OF THEM?

I spent a decade in fraud prevention and it still amazes me how often people believe the unbelievable. It's why it's so easy to steal from people, they WANT to be fooled.
 
Loiosh said:
If it's all so clear to you, a layman, why do you think it's failing in the courts? Are you smarter than them? Are they dirty? ALL OF THEM?

I spent a decade in fraud prevention and it still amazes me how often people believe the unbelievable. It's why it's so easy to steal from people, they WANT to be fooled.
Click to expand...

A number of the conservative judges in multiple states ruled in favor, like in WI. But the liberal ones declined it.

And now your switching from what is in the pages, pictures of dick button? to why denied. Maybe you should look into these cases before commenting. How can a judge go through all that in a hour or two?
 
Last edited:
cottagecheesefan said:
A number of the conservative judges in multiple states ruled in favor, like in WI. But the liberal ones declined it.

And now your switching from what is in the pages, pictures of dick button? to why denied. Maybe you should look into these cases before commenting. How can a judge go through all that in a hour or two?
Click to expand...

I already explained why the raw tonnage of documentation is completely irrelevant. It serves only to confuse the marks.

At the end of the day it doesn't matter what they sell, you're going to buy.

Jet fuel can't melt votes, right?
 
Loiosh said:
I already explained why the raw tonnage of documentation is completely irrelevant. It serves only to confuse the marks.

At the end of the day it doesn't matter what they sell, you're going to buy.

Jet fuel can't melt votes, right?
Click to expand...


Right, so you didn't follow any of it and feel like an expert? How about another quote from a judge you can't remember about something you also can't remember.
 
Loiosh said:
If it's all so clear to you, a layman, why do you think it's failing in the courts? Are you smarter than them? Are they dirty? ALL OF THEM?

I spent a decade in fraud prevention and it still amazes me how often people believe the unbelievable. It's why it's so easy to steal from people, they WANT to be fooled.
Click to expand...
Dunning-krueger effect is heavy in the Trump republican base
 
Last edited:
cottagecheesefan said:
Right, so you didn't follow any of it and feel like an expert? How about another quote from a judge you can't remember about something you also can't remember.
Click to expand...

I don't have to prove anything to you, the courts are already doing that.

I followed a number of these proceedings until it was apparent trump was just putting on a show to milk the rubes. I "feel like an expert" because I made cases for a decade and understand the process, where you clearly don't. You're making declarations from ignorance and I'm clearing things up for you.

Anyone saying 8,000 pages means the issue couldn't have possibly have been processed quickly and properly is a fool or a liar, and I've explained why.

I don't need to spend any time looking into the specifics to say that definitively, it's a fact, irregardless of the case.

A number of cases have been dismissed with prejudice. That's a pretty severe rebuke, and it's a court's way of saying "stop wasting our time with nonsense cases".

And now your position is that they're being rejected by liberal judges, completely ignoring the fact several have been rejected by Trump appointees, including at the highest level.

You're actually making some pretty serious accusations here.

Please name the judge you're accusing of treason, the case you're referring to, the cause that was presented and rejected, what vital evidence was ignored, and how pertinent it was to proving the case.
 
Will this thread still be going on in February?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,999
Messages
58,475,551
Members
176,048
Latest member
gibberish

Share this page

Back
Top