Elections Election Fraud update V.2 - more evidence?

Keep it real dude. It wasn't a "might". It was a straight up Trump and his campaign teamed with Russia to steal the elections. It was talked about for 4 years straight, and the Mueller report was trash canned by the FBI director when he admitted they fucked up big time on FISA warrants which started the entire thing. Some people got arrested on unrelated charges and they are all out of jail now except I think trumps ex lawyer who is in jail on different charges.
Oh come on man, they aren't even remotely the same. 34 people were indicted as a result of the Mueller report. Now did some people go too far with the Russiagate stuff. Yes, especially the people saying outlandish things like Trump is a Manchurian candidate and he was working for Russia since the 80s. But there was some truth to the Russiagate stuff. What you're doing is just lazy bothsidesism and "enlightened centrism". It should be clear which side is more insane and which side makes the more outlandish and conspiratorial claims, and it's not the Democrats.
 
I was wondering how long this would take, to be honest, it should have come sooner.

 


ruby freeman isnt even the one with the blonde braids who was around that debunked suitcase scandal. she's supposedly the daughter of that person with the blonde braids, who was seen in the youtube video in front of those boxes of absentee ballots. this idiot didnt even put a whole 2 minutes of effort into herping out this nonnsense. only the dumbest and delusional of trumpets wouldnt be able to see this for what it really is.

this guys a clown. looking further down the tweets, his "source" appears to be a random youtube video. from a guy named general sheppard 1776, a fresh new youtube account that was created literally just a couple hours ago just to post this kind of political filth

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmZkUcADR4lsfJGOklzs4vA/videos

and in the comments section of the youtube video, the first thing youll see is that he's begging for donations. when someone asked him for a source to this ridiculousness, he replied to them saying some shit like "CNN doesnt provide a source. So why should I?"

so yeah, youre going to have to pay me alot of money if you want me to even try to pretend this isnt anything more than just more fake news that the trumpets are buying into in their alternate worlds here. send me your donations @b34stmode and i'll pretend to buy into this hogwash. if this is your big "this is it moment" youre really going to have a hard time dealing with reality after sleepy joe gets inaugurated

lamestream media is fake news deep state propaganda. even OANN, newsmax, breitbart, and the epoch times. i get my factual information from the most credible of sources. the babylon bee, and social media accounts of well known trustworthy citizens, like ciggy flicker and general shepard 1776


Russian and Chinese propaganda again. When will Reds start figuring out they are helping to spread foreign disinformation?
 
@cottagecheesefan

I've got your next big breaking news. This ties everything together. Yesterday it was reported that Russian had access to UG Govt systems since March. Well, now it's being reported that several companies have been affected. Dominion is one of those companies. The Russians hacked Dominion voting machines and changed the source code to allow more votes to Biden. The Russians want Trump gone because Hunter Biden has connections to Russians through Ukraine. They want to leverage this relationship with Hunter to force Joe Biden to lift sanctions on Putin. Shits are going to drop soon.
 
I don't disagree homie. Just I knew all the liberals here would chime in, saying it is fake. This audit literally started this week and isn't even finished. But they expect it all to be crystal clear within a day or two. That is the problem when people get a life time of news from people like John Stewart or Colbert. They have short attention spans and cannot critically think. They think news is a 30-60 second build up with an obvious punchline. That is why they post articles and tweets from liberal media that doesn't actually cite first hand video, transcripts, or data, just more like "lol at Trump and conservatives 1-50". And even with the court cases, if they actually looked at most of them, it is basically the courts do not want to hear the case, not that the "evidence" is false. That was a big point in CONGRESS yesterday. That is not a CT or fake news, it is literally discussed in congress

That is why I try to post mostly actual congressional hearings or reports, and/or tweets or videos of actual legislators, because that is all first hand accounts. Not second or third hand accounts of already second hand information.

Judges do take a look at the case and evidence submitted before they throw out cases.
 
If this has any ounce of truth to what he says, my assertion (ie. Roberts was at the center of the SCOTUS's decision not to even look at the case) is confirmed.



But that said, unless there was an actual recording of him saying this, it sounds more like wishful thinking here.


There was a riot right before Bush v Gore that was directly related to the recoun in Florida. If Roberts said that he is ignorant or lying.
 



look it's one legion okay? By the way, the Rubicon? They were making it up to be this big thing, 'you cannot cross the rubicon with an army' have you seen it folks? It's a puddle, you can't even really tell you've crossed it even, I mean the only way you know you're out of gallia cisalpina there is that you walk into Rimini, so I don't think the senate really gets around much outside Rome. But we'll see what happens, won't we folks? I mean it's a roll of the dice really, These losers in the senate expect me to just leave all these big beautiful legions, and we love our troops folks, we really do, don't we love the troops? They're wonderful, but these old guys in Rome, i call them the sleepy senate, you'd never believe how low energy they are, especially Cato, right? I call him Mister Serious, Mister Serious Cato, but that sister of his is a beautiful woman, she really is, and Serious knows that, so I can't be too hard on him, anyway, they wanted me to come back alone, and believe me, I wouldn't have any trouble handling walking back to Rome myself but think about it folks, we take care of all of Gaul up there and then they just want me to leave the troops at the river after all we did for the big beautiful republic, so I brought back just the one legion, you know, to give them a heroes welcome at the gates because really Rome wasn't doing so hot when I left but now I come back from winning Gaul, they said it Gaul could never be pacified, but maybe they just weren't as good as me, you know? They had to beg and plead with brennus, tears in their eyes, to spare Rome but now I come back and they're saying "magna roma" again and i don't think anyone was saying that before, but they didn't bring vercingetorix back from alesia, nobody builds a wall like I do but they don't tell you i built two walls, they thought one wall was enough but I knew this vercingetorix was a tough guy, really big with the gauls and I said "we need another wall to be sure, he's a big guy around here and we should do two walls" so we did two walls and now he's a prisoner, but they won't let me bring the troops home even though I made rome great again and we won in gaul and we won in iberia and we won in brittania and now they say we can't win in rome, folks do you think we should go win in rome, yeah I think we deserve to win in rome so why the hell not, like I said let's just roll the dice and see what happens
 
Did they not already send alternate electors in multiple states? Do the republicans not have control on a state by state basis?

A state government trifecta is a term to describe single party government, when one political party holds three positions in a state's government.There are currently 37 trifectas: 15 Democratic and 22 Republican. As a result of the 2020 elections, Republicans increased their trifecta total with a net gain of two trifectas. States with divided government—no trifecta for either major party—declined by two. Democrats neither gained or lost trifectas.

Plus the house itself have a 27-23 republican advantage after this election, and 26-24 prior.

As an aside, lol at Whitmer. She looks like someone who would be cast as a villain in a Tim Burton movie.




No? Each state send the correct amount of electors as laid down in the constitution.

Some dipshits sent some friends as part of political theater also, but they have just as much to do with the electoral college as my dog.
 
There was a riot right before Bush v Gore that was directly related to the recoun in Florida. If Roberts said that he is ignorant or lying.
he didn't. The justices haven't met in person for most of this year, for virus related reasons

the entire imaginary closed-door shouting match between supreme court justices is just red meat for the dumbest rubes alive. Which goes a long way towards explaining why the people who believe it believe it
 
That's just a meme. In reality, courts almost never went past the preliminary hearings. The cases were dismissed on standing, not on their merits. Basically the courts are saying they want nothing to do with this. It's like Pilates washing his hands.

The evidence for fraud is clear. In Nevada alone, 4000 non-citizens voted. This was easily confirmed by referencing DMV. When non-citizens vote, it's called fraud. Approximately 1500 dead people voted in Nevada. When dead people vote, it's fraud. 19000 people voted although they didn't live in Nevada (excluding students and military personnel), that's fraud. 8000 people voted from non-existing addresses, that's fraud. In Wisconsin, thousands have voted via "indefinitely confined" ballots. This special ballot is designed for people that cannot leave their homes. It grants them the ability to cast a ballot without providing any sort of ID.

Election officials across Wisconsin have been shocked by the number of voters claiming to be “indefinitely confined” in the run up to the election next month.

Since the Spring General Election in April, another 49,769 voters have registered as indefinitely confined. That’s an increase of 26 percent. The total number of indefinitely confined voters in Wisconsin now stands at 243,900. Last year, the total number was only 72,000. That is an increase of 238% in just over a year.
A Quarter-Million Wisconsin Voters Claim To Be “Indefinitely Confined” And Not Bound By Voter ID | MacIver Institute

People made false "indefinitely confined" applications, that is called fraud. Do leftists have a problem with the dictionary?

These are just some examples of fraud. There have been other forms and it's very detailed if you read the court cases. When you think about it, half the country finished counting in 48 hours. They knew they had completed the count because they knew exactly how many mail-in ballots were requested, sent and received. They could after election day claim that "look, we have everything, let's turn over the results". Meanwhile, in the swing states, in democratic counties, they kept counting for almost two weeks. You'd see precincts report 99% for a few days, and they'd add more ballots and the number of "reporting in" would stay the same. In essence, they could not count or predict how many more there were because the numbers did not match. If you receive for example 400,000 ballots and you've processed half of them, you'd be able to tell accurately how many you have left to process. When the number is unknown, as was the case with the democratic counties in the swing states, there is fraud.

The adjudicating process with the Dominion Voting System is another clusterfuck. You have essentially a software machine that scans ballots with an immense error rate. This translates to a large number of adjudicated ballots. You have essentially one, usually two, people tasked with deciding who the vote should go to. As the audit in Antrim county reported, the logs that record actions performed by the adjudicators were erased. How can you trust me, if I was an adjudicator, that I didn't convert a large number of Trump ballots to Biden ballots? You'd have no way to know once the log files are gone. It's fraud. If you cast a vote in someone's name and delete the log files that record your actions and reasons as to why you have given an ambiguous ballot to either candidate, you've committed fraud.

I don't believe CISA, DHS are telling the truth when they claim there was no organized/widespread voter fraud in this election. Klobuchar and Warren both wrote extensively, sometimes citing DHS, about their concerns with regards to the private equity firms owning the voting apparatus ahead of the election.

Warren, Klobuchar, Wyden, and Pocan Investigate Vulnerabilities and Shortcomings of Election Technology Industry with Ties to Private Equity | U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (senate.gov)

What happened with these major concerns now that their candidate has won the election? Did they suddenly vanish or evaporate? How can you claim there is no reason to perform large-scale forensic audits when just prior to the election you rang the bell and yelled out loud your concerns about potential fraud? Does this seem honest to you?

But to me, the most glaring indication that DHS, CISA, FBI, CIA, etc. are lying is the massive hack that occurred and which was disclosed just days ago. How can you claim that this was the most secure election in history, or even use the word secure, while you're simultaneously admitting that almost every government agency has been compromised since March of this year? Even Dominion Voting Systems was a client of Solarwinds, the company whose products were used to penetrate the networks. Although they've been sneaky and took down any reference to Solarwinds, their webpage from last week was archived and is up there for all to see.

Serv-U (archive.org)


I'm back.
tenor.gif
 
That's just a meme. In reality, courts almost never went past the preliminary hearings. The cases were dismissed on standing, not on their merits. Basically the courts are saying they want nothing to do with this. It's like Pilates washing his hands.

The evidence for fraud is clear. In Nevada alone, 4000 non-citizens voted. This was easily confirmed by referencing DMV. When non-citizens vote, it's called fraud. Approximately 1500 dead people voted in Nevada. When dead people vote, it's fraud. 19000 people voted although they didn't live in Nevada (excluding students and military personnel), that's fraud. 8000 people voted from non-existing addresses, that's fraud. In Wisconsin, thousands have voted via "indefinitely confined" ballots. This special ballot is designed for people that cannot leave their homes. It grants them the ability to cast a ballot without providing any sort of ID.


A Quarter-Million Wisconsin Voters Claim To Be “Indefinitely Confined” And Not Bound By Voter ID | MacIver Institute

People made false "indefinitely confined" applications, that is called fraud. Do leftists have a problem with the dictionary?

These are just some examples of fraud. There have been other forms and it's very detailed if you read the court cases. When you think about it, half the country finished counting in 48 hours. They knew they had completed the count because they knew exactly how many mail-in ballots were requested, sent and received. They could after election day claim that "look, we have everything, let's turn over the results". Meanwhile, in the swing states, in democratic counties, they kept counting for almost two weeks. You'd see precincts report 99% for a few days, and they'd add more ballots and the number of "reporting in" would stay the same. In essence, they could not count or predict how many more there were because the numbers did not match. If you receive for example 400,000 ballots and you've processed half of them, you'd be able to tell accurately how many you have left to process. When the number is unknown, as was the case with the democratic counties in the swing states, there is fraud.

The adjudicating process with the Dominion Voting System is another clusterfuck. You have essentially a software machine that scans ballots with an immense error rate. This translates to a large number of adjudicated ballots. You have essentially one, usually two, people tasked with deciding who the vote should go to. As the audit in Antrim county reported, the logs that record actions performed by the adjudicators were erased. How can you trust me, if I was an adjudicator, that I didn't convert a large number of Trump ballots to Biden ballots? You'd have no way to know once the log files are gone. It's fraud. If you cast a vote in someone's name and delete the log files that record your actions and reasons as to why you have given an ambiguous ballot to either candidate, you've committed fraud.

I don't believe CISA, DHS are telling the truth when they claim there was no organized/widespread voter fraud in this election. Klobuchar and Warren both wrote extensively, sometimes citing DHS, about their concerns with regards to the private equity firms owning the voting apparatus ahead of the election.

Warren, Klobuchar, Wyden, and Pocan Investigate Vulnerabilities and Shortcomings of Election Technology Industry with Ties to Private Equity | U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (senate.gov)

What happened with these major concerns now that their candidate has won the election? Did they suddenly vanish or evaporate? How can you claim there is no reason to perform large-scale forensic audits when just prior to the election you rang the bell and yelled out loud your concerns about potential fraud? Does this seem honest to you?

But to me, the most glaring indication that DHS, CISA, FBI, CIA, etc. are lying is the massive hack that occurred and which was disclosed just days ago. How can you claim that this was the most secure election in history, or even use the word secure, while you're simultaneously admitting that almost every government agency has been compromised since March of this year? Even Dominion Voting Systems was a client of Solarwinds, the company whose products were used to penetrate the networks. Although they've been sneaky and took down any reference to Solarwinds, their webpage from last week was archived and is up there for all to see.

Serv-U (archive.org)


I'm back.
tenor.gif


https://www.washingtonpost.com/cont...lection/e2bfd645-efb5-4862-8680-ce92c9ccf6e2/

Complete BS, judges that Trump appointed ruled against him on merits. Judge Stephanos Bibas in the 3rd circuit wrote on behalf of the appeals court in a unanimous decision. “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

https://www.wpr.org/federal-judge-denies-trump-lawsuit-wisconsin

U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig, who was nominated by Trump, was the seventh loss for the president and his allies in their efforts to overturn Wisconsin's election. On Saturday, Ludwig made clear that he did not believe Trump had met the threshold for taking such an unprecedented step.

"Because plaintiff has failed to show a clear departure from the Wisconsin Legislature’s directives, his complaint must be dismissed," Ludwig said. "There has been no violation of the Constitution."
 
Last edited:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/cont...lection/e2bfd645-efb5-4862-8680-ce92c9ccf6e2/

Complete BS, judges that Trump appointed ruled against him on merits. Judge Stephanos Bibas in the 3rd circuit wrote on behalf of the appeals court in a unanimous decision. “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
There is proof, I just posted. Are you blind?

By the way, most proof is produced by real audits, audits that most state executives have denied so far. You can't claim there is no proof while discouraging investigation that produces said proof. Have you lost your sense of logic?


There is statistical evidence too. How can the mail-in ballots counted on the 4th be significantly for Biden, but mail-in ballots counted on the 5th, 6th, 7th, etc. average a significantly lower number than the ones on the 4th. In real life, even the ones counted on the 4th should average what the following days yielded for Biden, but that's not what happened, including in Pennsylvania. Instead of there being an even distribution of mail-in votes for Biden, the ones tallied on the 4th were exaggeratedly for him. No one is denying that that mail-in ballots favored Biden by the way. The point is that mail-in ballots counted on the 4th of November were excessively for Biden, this shouldn't have happened given the fact that during the following days, Biden ballots average a significantly lesser number. It's actually worse, even the democrat voters on election day show a remarkable difference between democrats that voted via mail-in. That should not occur in real life and it didn't occur with republicans. You'd expect election day voters to mirror mail-in voters, but that's not what happened with the democrat voters. Election day democrats voted down ticket, and a significant number of mail-in democratic voters did not. This is pretty glaring evidence and it should suffice for a judge to hear the case, provided the judge can do basic arithmetic. Can you?

By the way, do you think when rape victims appear in court, do you think they have video evidence of the guy (or girl) in the act of committing rape lol? Do rapes happen? According to you no, because there is no direct evidence.

Watch the video I posted and come back to me.
 
There is proof, I just posted. Are you blind?

By the way, most proof is produced by real audits, audits that most state executives have denied so far. You can't claim there is no proof while discouraging investigation that produces said proof. Have you lost your sense of logic?


There is statistical evidence too. How can the mail-in ballots counted on the 4th be significantly for Biden, but mail-in ballots counted on the 5th, 6th, 7th, etc. average a significantly lower number than the ones on the 4th. In real life, even the ones counted on the 4th should average what the following days yielded for Biden, but that's not what happened, including in Pennsylvania. Instead of there being an even distribution of mail-in votes for Biden, the ones tallied on the 4th were exaggeratedly for him. No one is denying that that mail-in ballots favored Biden by the way. The point is that mail-in ballots counted on the 4th of November were excessively for Biden, this shouldn't have happened given the fact that during the following days, Biden ballots average a significantly lesser number. It's actually worse, even the democrat voters on election day show a remarkable difference between democrats that voted via mail-in. That should not occur in real life and it didn't occur with republicans. You'd expect election day voters to mirror mail-in voters, but that's not what happened with the democrat voters. Election day democrats voted down ticket, and a significant number of mail-in democratic voters did not. This is pretty glaring evidence and it should suffice for a judge to hear the case, provided the judge can do basic arithmetic. Can you?

By the way, do you think when rape victims appear in court, do you think they have video evidence of the guy (or girl) in the act of committing rape lol? Do rapes happen? According to you no, because there is no direct evidence.

Watch the video I posted and come back to me.

this one
 
There is proof, I just posted. Are you blind?

By the way, most proof is produced by real audits, audits that most state executives have denied so far. You can't claim there is no proof while discouraging investigation that produces said proof. Have you lost your sense of logic?


There is statistical evidence too. How can the mail-in ballots counted on the 4th be significantly for Biden, but mail-in ballots counted on the 5th, 6th, 7th, etc. average a significantly lower number than the ones on the 4th. In real life, even the ones counted on the 4th should average what the following days yielded for Biden, but that's not what happened, including in Pennsylvania. Instead of there being an even distribution of mail-in votes for Biden, the ones tallied on the 4th were exaggeratedly for him. No one is denying that that mail-in ballots favored Biden by the way. The point is that mail-in ballots counted on the 4th of November were excessively for Biden, this shouldn't have happened given the fact that during the following days, Biden ballots average a significantly lesser number. It's actually worse, even the democrat voters on election day show a remarkable difference between democrats that voted via mail-in. That should not occur in real life and it didn't occur with republicans. You'd expect election day voters to mirror mail-in voters, but that's not what happened with the democrat voters. Election day democrats voted down ticket, and a significant number of mail-in democratic voters did not. This is pretty glaring evidence and it should suffice for a judge to hear the case, provided the judge can do basic arithmetic. Can you?

By the way, do you think when rape victims appear in court, do you think they have video evidence of the guy (or girl) in the act of committing rape lol? Do rapes happen? According to you no, because there is no direct evidence.

Watch the video I posted and come back to me.


It is not proof until it is presented in court and cross examined by attorneys and or judges. Trumps own appointed judges have stated that they have not brought the evidence\proof required to grant the remedy that they are asking for and ruled against him on merits.
 
It is not proof until it is presented in court and cross examined by attorneys and or judges. Trumps own appointed judges have stated that they have not brought the evidence\proof required to grant the remedy that they are asking for and ruled against him on merits.
most judges dismissed the cases before the evidence could be presented. and whether they were appointed by Trump or Emperor Nero is meaningless imo. there are subfactions within factions. you can see that on both sides, left or right. but to be more precise, it was Mitch McConnell (and others) that picked judges. Trump took their advice and appointed them.
 
Back
Top