Elections Election Fraud update - evidence coming in so fast we can't keep up

Status
Not open for further replies.
EyeOfNewt said:
on a second thought, the barcodes wouldn’t even have to work. remember the videos passed around of elections workers filling empty ballots? people said it was evidence of fraud and muh fact checkers said they were transferring voter data from rejected ballots to new readable ones?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ll-workers-fixing-damaged-ballots/6185589002/

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-video-election-workers-ball-idUSKBN27M2PM

i don’t know if you saw the videos, you can easily find them on streamable or even MsM. but they were literally filling ballots for hours in several states and counties. the number of rejected ballots was huge as you can see from the videos. this would fit the narrative of counterfeit ballots from China
Click to expand...

when was the last time you had a mental check?

you cant even keep your wild theories (without a shred of evidence) straight
 
Gomi1977 said:
tenor.gif


https://patents.justia.com/assignee/dominion-voting-systems-inc
Click to expand...
wait what are you saying? that Dominion didn’t sold patents to hsbc?
 
mudflap mike said:
when was the last time you had a mental check?

you cant even keep your wild theories (without a shred of evidence) straight
Click to expand...
explain the video then and the. explain why there were so many ‘damaged ‘ballots that required half a day to transfer on new readable ones
 
EyeOfNewt said:
remember the footage from the counting rooms? you had one elections worker in front of another separated by a screen. one was telling the other what to write on a new ballot based on already filled one that was rejected? there were videos of this, hours long. at various places. would make perfect sense if they were chinese ballots. the officials themselves said they were not filling ballots but rather transferring them from rejected ones to new ones. and there were troves of them. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ll-workers-fixing-damaged-ballots/6185589002/

this happened in a few swing states. you’d see a dozen of election workers fill empty ballots. one doing the filling, the other saying out loud what to check on the ballot according to the ‘damaged’ ballot

i dropped the give him your energy troll act. i legit believe this
Click to expand...
Extremely unlikely. You’d have such a large number of ballots which look fine but don’t work, that would cause major red flags. Additionally this theory wouldn’t address the logistical issues I raised of mailing these in, not having thousands of registered voters complain because they were told they already voted when they didn’t, or even worse logistical issues if it’s done in person.

Taking you at your word that you weren’t trolling with this theory, you just demonstrated the issue with theories like this: I raised a bunch of issues to demonstrate how it’s not possible, and all you did is pivot to a new conspiracy theory. I just poked holes in that one, and you’ll just deny without proof or pivot to a new conspiracy. And pivot again. And again. Because you want to believe, you won’t respond to logic and reason.
 
Anyone know what happened to the guy that Project Veritas and James O’Keefe was promoting that he personally witness massive fraud? The post office guy.
I hope O’Keefe has him surrounded by body guards who were ex special forces, because Robo Chavez will send a team of ninjas to take that guy out. Robo Chavez does not leave liabilities alive.
 
44nutman said:
Anyone know what happened to the guy that Project Veritas and James O’Keefe was promoting that he personally witness massive fraud? The post office guy.
I hope O’Keefe has him surrounded by body guards who were ex special forces, because Robo Chavez will send a team of ninjas to take that guy out. Robo Chavez does not leave liabilities alive.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure that one went the way of the watermarks, Q, and I-see-dead-people-voting.
 
BFoe said:
Extremely unlikely. You’d have such a large number of ballots which look fine but don’t work, that would cause major red flags. Additionally this theory wouldn’t address the logistical issues I raised of mailing these in, not having thousands of registered voters complain because they were told they already voted when they didn’t, or even worse logistical issues if it’s done in person.

Taking you at your word that you weren’t trolling with this theory, you just demonstrated the issue with theories like this: I raised a bunch ch of issues to demonstrate how it’s not possible, and all you did is pivot to a new conspiracy theory. I just poked holes in that one, and you’ll just deny without proof or pivot to a new conspiracy. And pivot again. And again. Because you want to believe, you won’t respond to logic and reason.
Click to expand...
but that’s exactly what happened. large number of ballots looked fined but were rejected and it did raise flags.
https://www.wusa9.com/mobile/articl...ideo/507-cd6d0cc9-12f8-4ed2-9c2c-262671f2e1b4

https://www.abc10.com/article/news/...rror/287-f300b29b-6995-471e-ad21-8af2af4d5d11

“"We started noticing about a third of them were being rejected by the scanners when they’re imaged," Garcia told county commissioners.”

logistically I don’t think China has problems. plenty of people on the inside. even here in Canada the Huawei ceo was arrested by RCMP for similar (shady) stuff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Arkain2K
Crime Newsmax to pay $67 Million in defamation case over bogus 2020 "election fraud" claims
2 3
Replies
55
Views
884
Loiosh
Loiosh

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,198
Messages
57,973,866
Members
175,888
Latest member
whatsername

Share this page

Back
Top