Elections Election Fraud update - evidence coming in so fast we can't keep up

Status
Not open for further replies.
EyeOfNewt said:
the most corrupt and racist man lives in Ottawa.
justin_trudeau_yearbook_05.jpg

fa7a63f6-3a4c-4a85-b2c4-7b9b177fa1ff.jpeg
Click to expand...
If you thought he was a racist, you'd probably have voted for him.
 
EyeOfNewt said:
the problem was lack of time. we are entering week 3. no case of this magnitude took 3 weeks. check Weinstein case, took almost 2 years and it involved only a handful of people. weinstein case was highly publicized and the case was determined based on circumstantial evidence alone. the same kind of evidence the left says is insufficient, yet it was sufficient to put Harvey away for 23 years? looks like selective thinking to me. “we’ll say when it’s sufficient”
Click to expand...

Trump said there was fraud months before the election. If he was so sure of fraud he would had started back then but guess what it was all bullshit.
 
Hadron90 said:
Does Dominion flip chinese ballots too?
Click to expand...
remember the footage from the counting rooms? you had one elections worker in front of another separated by a screen. one was telling the other what to write on a new ballot based on already filled one that was rejected? there were videos of this, hours long. at various places. would make perfect sense if they were chinese ballots. the officials themselves said they were not filling ballots but rather transferring them from rejected ones to new ones. and there were troves of them. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ll-workers-fixing-damaged-ballots/6185589002/

this happened in a few swing states. you’d see a dozen of election workers fill empty ballots. one doing the filling, the other saying out loud what to check on the ballot according to the ‘damaged’ ballot

i dropped the give him your energy troll act. i legit believe this
 
EyeOfNewt said:
remember the footage from the counting rooms? you had one elections worker in front of another separated by a screen. one was telling the other what to write on a new ballot based on already filled one that was rejected? there were videos of this, hours long. at various places. would make perfect sense if they were chinese ballots. the officials themselves said they were not filling ballots but rather transferring them from rejected ones to new ones. and there were troves of them. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ll-workers-fixing-damaged-ballots/6185589002/

this happened in a few swing states. you’d see a dozen of election workers fill empty ballots. one doing the filling, the other saying out loud what to check on the ballot according to the ‘damaged’ ballot

i dropped the give him your energy troll act. i legit believe this
Click to expand...
 
BFoe said:
Oh FFS.
Spam them how? By mail? Obviously can’t mail them from China. It would require operatives here in the U.S., so as to get U.S. postmarks. And really to avoid suspicion, you’d need operatives all over a given state so as to not to raise red flags at one or two particular post offices as this mass of ballots comes streaming through. You’d have to do this in sufficient numbers to make a difference in that state—which is difficult, as you don’t know how all the legitimate voters in the state are going to vote—but without raising suspicion or having thousands and thousands of legit voters reporting that they show as already having voted when they did not.
Of course, even if you could pull this off, one state won’t win your candidate an election. It takes multiple states. So you need all these operatives in every state, and replicate the process I described above in state after state. Further, you’d have to target states in advance, as each state prints their own ballots and the style varies from state to state. You’d need to make perfect replicas of each style of state ballots. Also you’d need to be very sure about the software each state uses to count ballots (if they use software). Bar codes are written in a symbology, which is a sort of language. The symbology of the bar code must match the symbology of the scanner, or else it won’t read the bar code. Fuck that up in just *one* state, and the entire jig is up.

This is so preposterously unlikely to pull off, that it borders on the impossible.
So now that I’ve explained, will you go away?<Moves>
Click to expand...
on a second thought, the barcodes wouldn’t even have to work. remember the videos passed around of elections workers filling empty ballots? people said it was evidence of fraud and muh fact checkers said they were transferring voter data from rejected ballots to new readable ones?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ll-workers-fixing-damaged-ballots/6185589002/

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-video-election-workers-ball-idUSKBN27M2PM

i don’t know if you saw the videos, you can easily find them on streamable or even MsM. but they were literally filling ballots for hours in several states and counties. the number of rejected ballots was huge as you can see from the videos. this would fit the narrative of counterfeit ballots from China
 
EyeOfNewt said:
remember the footage from the counting rooms? you had one elections worker in front of another separated by a screen. one was telling the other what to write on a new ballot based on already filled one that was rejected? there were videos of this, hours long. at various places. would make perfect sense if they were chinese ballots. the officials themselves said they were not filling ballots but rather transferring them from rejected ones to new ones. and there were troves of them. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ll-workers-fixing-damaged-ballots/6185589002/

this happened in a few swing states. you’d see a dozen of election workers fill empty ballots. one doing the filling, the other saying out loud what to check on the ballot according to the ‘damaged’ ballot

i dropped the give him your energy troll act. i legit believe this
Click to expand...

That's a lot of stretching, and you need hard evidence to connect those things.
 
EyeOfNewt said:
on a second thought, the barcodes wouldn’t even have to work. remember the videos passed around of elections workers filling empty ballots? people said it was evidence of fraud and muh fact checkers said they were transferring voter data from rejected ballots to new readable ones?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ll-workers-fixing-damaged-ballots/6185589002/

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-video-election-workers-ball-idUSKBN27M2PM

i don’t know if you saw the videos, you can easily find them on streamable or even MsM. but they were literally filling ballots for hours in several states and counties. the number of rejected ballots was huge as you can see from the videos. this would fit the narrative of counterfeit ballots from China
Click to expand...

Do you know what I find special about all of this? You've done far more harm than good to Trump with the sheer amount of crap you've flooded onto these forums. It is possible, but highly unlikely, that any one of these theories could be accurate. But your constant and non-stop accusation that range from Chinese ballots, paper shredders, observers being denied entry, and phony affidavits are never fully fleshed out. The ones that have been obvious cons on you or propaganda from China/Russia have taken the energy out of ones that might be true.

Your total lack of effort to follow any one of these has given people enough reason to doubt every one of your claims. Good job. I told you weeks ago that you are a useful idiot. Keep doing the work you were intended to do and make 100% sure Trump doesn't have a chance in court.
 
EyeOfNewt said:
in other words, it’s doable. for the record, i’m not saying that’s what happened. my point all along is that with a process like this you definitely need to conduct thorough audits to ensure legitimacy of the election. and you have to admit, mass printing election ballots in China is shady af. even more so when you consider they have the patents for Dominion. if they have the source code and schematics, they can find a way to print eligible ballots. China is good at reverse engineering stuff. and with voter info and insiders in USA, i think its perfectly doable. remember they closed the embassy in Houston because it was a spy hub. i know this reads like a spy novel but 2020 has been from the start something out of a spy novel. tl;dr the dems should embrace an audit as much as republicans. 2024 is near and this won’t go away if nothing is done.
Click to expand...
It is not doable.
 
EyeOfNewt said:
in other words, it’s doable. for the record, i’m not saying that’s what happened. my point all along is that with a process like this you definitely need to conduct thorough audits to ensure legitimacy of the election. and you have to admit, mass printing election ballots in China is shady af. even more so when you consider they have the patents for Dominion. if they have the source code and schematics, they can find a way to print eligible ballots. China is good at reverse engineering stuff. and with voter info and insiders in USA, i think its perfectly doable. remember they closed the embassy in Houston because it was a spy hub. i know this reads like a spy novel but 2020 has been from the start something out of a spy novel. tl;dr the dems should embrace an audit as much as republicans. 2024 is near and this won’t go away if nothing is done.
Click to expand...
tenor.gif


https://patents.justia.com/assignee/dominion-voting-systems-inc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Arkain2K
Crime Newsmax to pay $67 Million in defamation case over bogus 2020 "election fraud" claims
2 3
Replies
55
Views
884
Loiosh
Loiosh

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,211
Messages
57,974,754
Members
175,888
Latest member
whatsername

Share this page

Back
Top