- Joined
- Jul 22, 2014
- Messages
- 8,200
- Reaction score
- 1,512
Yep. This part of the article was retarded-You lost me when you said Tito vs Chuck was worse then Ali vs Berbick. Dumb rant Points metre broke on that, sorry.
“Chuck Liddell’s fight with Tito Ortiz on Saturday night was actually worse than the end of Ali’s career.
Granted, there is no evidence of the hidden signs of neurological damage, nor is there any evidence that Liddell was filled with thyroid medication, as Ali was in the Holmes fight to make his body look presentable and fool he public into thinking he was in better shape than he had been in years. Ali went into a fight on medication that only made his fighting condition that much worse.”
So it was worse, even tho there was none of all this other stuff with Ali?
This is going to be an unpopular opinion of mine about this, but that’s fine. Chuck passed his physical. He chose to take this fight. He wasn’t getting in there was some young beast like Costa or someone like that. He’s 49 and fought a 44 year old and made a decent amount of money to do so.
Now do I think he should’ve fought? No. Of course not. We can all agree that he should’ve stayed retired, but he wanted to to fight again and passed everything he needed to for a fight against another aging vet. The commission shouldn’t let an old man fight a young killer that will no doubt take his head off, but if two vets in their 40’s want to fight each other and pass a physical, then go ahead.