- Joined
- Feb 24, 2008
- Messages
- 21,295
- Reaction score
- 42,458
They don't need to be held to a higher standard, just the same standard would be fine with me.
Man.... This should be a universal standard for anything in life
They don't need to be held to a higher standard, just the same standard would be fine with me.
What you said was that you could "appreciate his taking the right steps."
I simply disagreed in the classification of what he did, what he did was make one good decision in a night most likely filled with bad ones.
Not driving drunk in the first place would've been the right step.
I saw on most shocking once where cops pulled over a drunk woman superior court judge. She gave them shit and told them they wouldn't have jobs come Monday if they took her in. They ended driving her home and another cop drove her car to her home for her.
The games at trial come from the technology. The "datamaster" and the training required to understand how it works; most cops don't have it. If it's a blood draw, then the process required for safe handling is fairly detailed and often either not completely followed, or remembered. The lawyers who specialize, who are the best, visit the factory where the datamasters are made, and befriend the company. It's pretty interesting. I learned how the gas spectrometry worked in detecting alcohol and all that jazz. I'll have to go over those notes again.