- Joined
- Dec 16, 2015
- Messages
- 14,732
- Reaction score
- 16,094
I'm running in good faith here. Not trying to go in either direction, it's just genuine inquiry from someone who didn't even know the dude existed until I encountered this thread.*Sigh*
This is an example of only hearing a few talking points, or selectively edited quotes from the 'admittion,' and concluding he's comitted a crime.
He's admitted to, and so far there's no evidence he's done more than this -
*Socially messaged a minor.
*No pictures were exchanged.
*No 'sexting.'
*But in his words - "sometimes leaned in the direction of being inappropriate."
Now that last quote is interesting, and its purposely left to the interpretations of everyone.
You may think that automatically makes it inappropriate, or perhaps there was a line he knew he couldn't cross and he didn't but he came close to it.
Unfortunately we're probably never going to figure out, unless the exact text is somehow leaked... if someone still has it.
Regardless that's probably enough to draw your own conclusions.
It just seems to me that if someone, in a post that has been erected to defend himself, includes a comment that says "our conversations leaned in an inappropriate direction," that's a lot of smoke for supposedly no fire. It would appear to eliminate several possible explanations for the controversy. You said that the last quote was purposely left to interpretation. My response to that is to ask why? Why would someone leave anything to interpretation?
Last edited: