Donna Brazile turns

This could be a Harvey Weinstein phenomenon where everyone circled the wagons and held up a wall of silence, regardless of their true feelings, as long as he was regarded as powerful. Once that power was lost the knives came out. Remember the story of Hillary throwing a temper tantrum and calling Donna Brazile "brain dead Buffalo"? You think any woman just takes that on the chin with no designs on vengeance?


Damn. .. brain dead buffalo lmao. Didn't think hillary clever enough to come up with such a burn
 
So by hacking the DNC and exposing their extreme shadiness....

aren't the 'Russians' arguably just doing our own Media's job?

They exposed the MEDDLING of the DNC, not the other way around IMO

WikiLeaks was our Woodward and Bernstein in this scenario, correct?

That is correct.

Journalism is largely dead. The MSM is the de facto propaganda wing of the Clinton Campaign.

Julian Assange deserves the Nobel Prize for Journalism.
 
I think you can spare the part about undermining democracy. The DNC is a private club and their stacking the deck in favor of their preferred candidate doesn't have anything to do do with democracy.

That's one way to look at it. But in reality, you can't become president unless you go through the channels of the GOP or the DNC. Trump has always been a democrat, but with DNC super delegates he never would have stood a chance. If the GOP also used super delegates, there would be no democracy left.
 
The way the Clinton's were running the DNC for their personal benefit aside, am I the only one intrigued that the DNC was broke?
 
The way the Clinton's were running the DNC for their personal benefit aside, am I the only one intrigued that the DNC was broke?
No, I think that is very interesting too. We may have reached a point where most ordinary people see that the Democrats don't really represent them anymore, and the vast majority of all the big big money is going Republican.

I would say that the concentration of wealth in this country over the last 30 years has impacted that as well. The Republican party is purely a party of capital now.
 
My point is, why do people accept that Russia hacked the DNC when we don't know who made the claim or why they made it? Given the corruption involved in Clinton's fundraising, this is highly suspect.

I think a variety of intelligence agencies also said it was Russia. I don't feel like looking it up but I think some foreign agencies said the same.
 
I wonder if the timing of this has anything to do with the ongoing investigations.
 
These last few years have been the most interesting (and trying) times in US politics. Brazile was a heel and now she seems poised to turn hero? The DNC might be on the ropes or ready for a major shake-up? Sessions isn't the "Sheriff" Trump wished for? McCain, McConnel, and Ryan are cementing their RINO status?

I may have to watch the GSP / Bisping card to get my mind off of all of this. Watching a Brit living in the US with a thick English accent fight a Canadian with a French Canadian accent should be enough of a respite from politics. I think.
 
She took the fall and got jack shit. Oh well, at least she realized it. Most liberal crony types spend their entire lives waiting for that doggy treat from the "party royalty" that never comes.
 
Last edited:
These last few years have been the most interesting (and trying) times in US politics. Brazile was a heel and now she seems poised to turn hero? The DNC might be on the ropes or ready for a major shake-up? Sessions isn't the "Sheriff" Trump wished for? McCain, McConnel, and Ryan are cementing their RINO status?

I may have to watch the GSP / Bisping card to get my mind off of all of this. Watching a Brit living in the US with a thick English accent fight a Canadian with a French Canadian accent should be enough of a respite from politics. I think.
 
This is it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

right guys?

this is the big one!!!!

its that "gotcha" moment!!!!


the day is finally here!!!!!


LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!!!



or


maybe its just more nonsense to distract from the Mueller indictments :)
 
I think a variety of intelligence agencies also said it was Russia. I don't feel like looking it up but I think some foreign agencies said the same.

The document I linked to was originally reported to represent 17 intelligence agencies. That was redacted down to 4. In any event, who is the author? Was that author a political appointment? We saw what political appointment Loretta Lynch was capable of. Now we see what DNC staff were capable of. Whose bare opinion are we relying on here?
 
need to get rid of Super Delegates or they can always rig the system.
 
The document I linked to was originally reported to represent 17 intelligence agencies. That was redacted down to 4. In any event, who is the author? Was that author a political appointment? We saw what political appointment Loretta Lynch was capable of. Now we see what DNC staff were capable of. Whose bare opinion are we relying on here?

So the formal government report isn't good enough. What standard of proof are you looking for?
 
That's the entire point, had you actually read the post to which you originally replied: the Democratic Party literally had to give the reigns to a neoliberal plutocrat in Clinton and the modern Democrats have had to carve out neoliberal caveats (big finance, big pharmaceuticals, etc.) just to subsidize their actual honest-hearted policies.

There is no possible way for the two-party system to function post-Citizens United without an outstandingly educated and meticulously aware citizenry. Which means it cannot function at all. Each party is going to have to devolve into selling out citizens' interests to sustain its financing. The one that regards genuine policy interests less is going to retain a distinct competitive advantage.

Citizens United isn't really to blame here. That case only affected the ability of corporations, unions, etc, to engage in "electioneering communications" within 60 days of a general election (and any state laws with similar proscriptions at any time). That's it. All of the events Brazille detailed occurred many months before the general. Citizens was a natural extension of First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (where the SCOTUS held that corporations could make contributions to ballot campaign initiatives (1976)).

It gets a bad rap. I think it was correctly decided on First Amendment grounds.
 
So the formal government report isn't good enough. What standard of proof are you looking for?

No, a letterhead stamp by an anonymous official is not good enough. The standard of proof that is good enough is proponderence of the evidence. At this point, the only hard evidence, not opinion, evidence, we have that Russia hacked the DNC is an IP address in Moscow’s time zone was regularly pinging the DNC server. Seriously. That’s it.

In fact, file transfer time stamps show the DNC files were copied onto a USB and not uploaded online, strong evidence that the hack involved an insider.

To add to the doubt, Vault 7 wikileaks release includes Marble, the CIA program designed to obfuscate cyber fingerprints and attribute them to foreign actors. Intelligence agencies have a vested financial and political interest in attributing actions to foreign actors. Cross examination of the source is required to determine its credibility.
 
Last edited:
How did you end up with dubs? Abortion videos again?
No.

I posted some protestors trying to stop a car, and the car went through anyway. And no it was not the Charlottesville one where someone died.

I guess the mods want to say that I'm encouraging violence. I don't know.
 
Back
Top