Donald Trump Jr.'s Russia email scandal shakes the presidency, v4: Cover of TIME

Status
Not open for further replies.
TheStruggle said:
No she's not. Pelosi is a stooge who job is to work up the left wing base with non-sense like you? If he violated the law, she should be the first one walking into Congress and demand that Trump and his team be brought up on charges, you know why that won't happen? There's nothing.
Click to expand...

We shall see if anyone is brought up on charges.
 
klnOmega said:
Taco bowls have value. They cost money right?

Lets say Trump called a campaign meeting at Trump tower. Jr goes out to the street and buys taco bowls for everyone in the meeting off a taco-vendor who is a Mexican citizen. Did he violate campaign finance law? I'm not playing an idiot here. It seems the law can't be interpreted as broadly as you are interpreting, or it would catch instances buying taco bowls.
Click to expand...
Just when I thought you were making progress in your mental breakdown recovery I see you're back to false equivalencies and straw man arguments. Sad.
 
Edison Carasio said:
Didn't you know that war room conservatives don't like it when you quote or repeat facts? They're only comfortable with alternative facts and retard talking points from Breitbart and Alex Jones.
Click to expand...


You guys are permarustled by a nutcase
 
klnOmega said:
Taco bowls have value. They cost money right?

Lets say Trump called a campaign meeting at Trump tower. Jr goes out to the street and buys taco bowls for everyone in the meeting off a taco-vendor who is a Mexican citizen. Did he violate campaign finance law? I'm not playing an idiot here. It seems the law can't be interpreted as broadly as you are interpreting, or it would catch instances buying taco bowls.
Click to expand...

Okay, so you are going full retard.

tumblr_mf65xjJjRO1qahdsko1_500.gif


Yes the taco bowl has value, but not to the campaign, but to the individual that eats it. Even if the law could be interpreted that way you think your argument is has an extra chromosome as the intent of the law is taken into account.
 
http://observer.com/2017/07/natalia-veselnitskaya-hillary-clinton-magnitsky-act/

In December 2015, The Wall Street Journal reported that Hillary Clinton opposed the Magnitsky Act while serving as secretary of state. Her opposition coincided with Bill Clinton giving a speech in Moscow for Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank—for which he was paid $500,000. “Mr. Clinton also received a substantial payout in 2010 from Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank whose executives were at risk of being hurt by possible U.S. sanctions tied to a complex and controversial case of alleged corruption in Russia. Members of Congress wrote to Mrs. Clinton in 2010 seeking to deny visas to people who had been implicated by Russian accountant Sergei Magnitsky, who was jailed and died in prison after he uncovered evidence of a large tax-refund fraud. William Browder, a foreign investor in Russia who had hired Mr. Magnitsky, alleged that the accountant had turned up evidence that Renaissance officials, among others, participated in the fraud.” The State Department opposed the sanctions bill at the time, as did the Russian government. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov pushed Hillary Clinton to oppose the legislation during a meeting in St. Petersburg in June 2012, citing that U.S.-Russia relations would suffer as a result.

The Wall Street Journal report continued, “A few weeks later, Bill Clinton participated in a question-and-answer session at a Renaissance Capital investors conference. He was paid $500,000. After the appearance, Mr. Clinton received a personal thank-you call from Vladimir Putin, then the Russian prime minister, the government news agency TASS reported.”
Click to expand...


Can we all agree, without screaming "b-b-b-b-but Hillary", that it seems Russia was very hard to influence both candidates to be opposed to this act?
 
TheStruggle said:
You guys are permarustled by a nutcase
Click to expand...
And you guys are still rustled by Obama and Hillary even though they've been gone for 6 months. Not a day goes by where you guys don't post a butt Obama or but Hillary excuse for some Trump f******.
 
m52nickerson said:
Okay, so you are going full retard.

tumblr_mf65xjJjRO1qahdsko1_500.gif


Yes the taco bowl has value, but not to the campaign, but to the individual that eats it. Even if the law could be interpreted that way you think your argument is has an extra chromosome as the intent of the law is taken into account.
Click to expand...

Lunches and dinners should absolutely count as value for the campaign. I mean, if Putin invited the Trump campaign to a $200,000 dinner at the a gorgeous ballroom in St. Petersburg, you would say that probably would certainly violate campaign finance laws, right?

Campaigns can certainly use dinners or lunches as campaign expenses.
 
Edison Carasio said:
And you guys are still rustled by Obama and Hillary even though they've been gone for 6 months. Not a day goes by where you guys don't post a butt Obama or but Hillary excuse for some Trump f******.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that happens when you complain about something now, you didn't care about 6 months ago


#HIstoryofNow
 
klnOmega said:
Lunches and dinners should absolutely count as value for the campaign. I mean, if Putin invited the Trump campaign to a $200,000 dinner at the a gorgeous ballroom in St. Petersburg, you would say that probably would certainly violate campaign finance laws, right?

Campaigns can certainly use dinners or lunches as campaign expenses.
Click to expand...

If you can't see the difference in buy some taco bowls from a guy on the street and attending a $200,000 dinner put on by Valdimar Putin you must have the IQ of a snail. Again, you are just playing dumb here because you have no other argument.
 
Edison Carasio said:
And you guys are still rustled by Obama and Hillary even though they've been gone for 6 months. Not a day goes by where you guys don't post a butt Obama or but Hillary excuse for some Trump f******.
Click to expand...

Please stop acting like both parties don't continually blame the previous administration for various issues.

Poor decisions made by administrations often have a lasting impact . . . just wait for the next democrat to get elected and folks blame Trump for everything half way through the administration.
 
Overpressure said:
If the National Review is calling it collusion, I think Trumpbots should be concerned
Click to expand...
Alt-right #1: what do we do in this situation?

Alt-right #2: I dunno. What we do in every situation?

Together: CUCKS!!!!!!
 
AP now reporting that Rinat said she brought Clinton docs to meeting and handed them over. Jr caught in a lie again.
 
It should be clear to dumbfuck Jr that the press knows every detail about this meeting. He shouldnt even be lying about what underwear he was wearing and expect to get away with it.

Its a shame the press is blowing their load for gotchas on Jr though. If theh could just got him before Congress or Mueller and then exposed his lies, he'd be defending perjury right now.
 
Madmick said:
Yeah, that's why all of the top officials-- including Trump himself-- are lying their asses off. He just got caught in a lie about his knowledge of the emails.

Because that makes sense of their behavior. You've put the pieces together. They're afraid of one giant #nothingburger! coming out.

strings-1.jpg


<Moves><Moves><Moves>
Click to expand...
You lefties are becoming more unhinged every day. This is all you guys have??? Get used to president Trump.
 
Overpressure said:
Ronald has been spinning in his grave, it's so disturbing.
Click to expand...
I know, right? I hate Reagan but even I am flabbergasted his party is so willing to get in bed with an ex-KGB agent autocrat. Could you imagine the hell fire that would have rained down if this shit was happening on Reagan's watch?

And fair is fair: Obama is a complete washout who rolled over when he discovered Putin's meddling. A large portion of the blame lays at his feet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,095
Messages
57,967,881
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top