- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
- Messages
- 22,517
- Reaction score
- 47,001
If its any of those circus clowns he surrounds himself with he can kiss the election goodbye.well it's safe to say that it won't be susan necheles or todd blanche.
If its any of those circus clowns he surrounds himself with he can kiss the election goodbye.well it's safe to say that it won't be susan necheles or todd blanche.
Last time he looked like that, he was standing next to Putin or the one time he was holding Melania's hand while she was kissing the Canadian Chad, AKA Trudeau.what i wouldnt have done to be a fly on the wall when that verdict came in.
he already looked like a defeated man the other day when he walked out to do his mother theresa level coping and seething.
![]()
this is what winning looks like right here everybody
He paid a prostitute under the table to influence an election and then tried to hide the payments through a corporate entity, instead of putting them on his campaign financing reports.Non disclosure agreements aren't a crime.
But that's another lie. WTF is wrong with you hacks?It wasn't a dumb decision to vote against swamp vomit Hillary. She would've started at least 3 new wars. And he's right about Obama. The guy ran on being "change" and then the 1st thing he did was put together a cabinet from names he got from an email from Citigroup.
He paid a prostitute under the table to influence an election and then tried to hide the payments through a corporate entity, instead of putting them on his campaign financing reports.
Since the point of the payments was for an election benefit, it could not be part of the corporation's expenses. That makes the corporation's business records fraudulent.
It's a pretty straightforward issue -- You can't expense political expenses as business expenses to avoid disclosing them on campaign financing reports.
He paid a prostitute under the table to influence an election and then tried to hide the payments through a corporate entity, instead of putting them on his campaign financing reports.
He's a lifelong grifter. Politics just gives him more power to run his scams. Now he doesn't even need to sell the base steaks or anything else. They send him their money like he was Jim Baker or some other phony mega-church pastor.I also hear the sky is blue and that ice is cold. He's a politician.
Nothing will fix the cultural direction of American more than the Bible salesman who raw dogs porn stars while his wife is home taking care of his newborn.Sorry, skipped the ChatGPT entries, but really this is not about Trump. One man one character one personality one symbol.
To a larger degree, it’s about 100s of millions of people in this country and abroad who are disillusioned with the direction The USA is going culturally financially and strategically.
There are serious questions that need to be answered by any administration about what the country supports and stands for on a global scale as well it concerns domestic posturing and policy.
Sure Jack. You can run along now.But that's another lie. WTF is wrong with you hacks?
Dont forget Trump did the most Trump thing and wrote off double the amount on his taxes as a business expense. One thing you wont find on that business expense deduction is a receipt for a condom.He paid a prostitute under the table to influence an election and then tried to hide the payments through a corporate entity, instead of putting them on his campaign financing reports.
Since the point of the payments was for an election benefit, it could not be part of the corporation's expenses. That makes the corporation's business records fraudulent.
It's a pretty straightforward issue -- You can't expense political expenses as business expenses to avoid disclosing them on campaign financing reports.
Agreed but still if this juror list ever comes out I'll shit kine if I see Sal D'Amato or Cecil Peoples!At least it was consistent and it wasn't a split decision like incompetent MMA judging![]()
"Under the table" as opposed to what? Sending the hooker a W-2?He paid a prostitute under the table to influence an election and then tried to hide the payments through a corporate entity, instead of putting them on his campaign financing reports.
Since the point of the payments was for an election benefit, it could not be part of the corporation's expenses. That makes the corporation's business records fraudulent.
It's a pretty straightforward issue -- You can't expense political expenses as business expenses to avoid disclosing them on campaign financing reports.
Lots of flippers in that one.Of all of Trump's cases, this was the most difficult one for prosecutors.
The Georgia case will be a slam dunk.
Christ only knows what would’ve happened if Adelaide Byrd was on the jury.![]()
Poor Trump paying millions for lawyers when all he had to do is get a Sherdog account and all the lawyers on here could have got him off. Trump could have pocketed that Bible, NFT and gold sneaker money and just had you represent him for free, since that is what you do on Sherdog."Under the table" as opposed to what? Sending the hooker a W-2?
They didn't file it as a campaign expense because it wasn't a campaign expense. Campaign expenses are expenses that can only be used by people running for office, and they're incredibly common for basically every celebrity and business person who aren't even running for anything. Where were the federal convictions?