- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 61,854
- Reaction score
- 130,998
You've taken a remarkable beating on this subject so I remarked on it.
Given your history in the Warroom, I'm so thankful you feel @avenue94 needed a hype man.
Ended up looking like -
You've taken a remarkable beating on this subject so I remarked on it.
Hardly traumatizing. Politics isn't my identity or emotional attachment unlike yourself. And I don't have a special idea of what auditors do I merely relayed to you what they actually do versus what you think they'll do in this situation. That you have no ability to think critically on your own isn't the world's fault.The sad part is you leftists have had a traumatizing month.
Losing the presidency.
Losing both the House & Senate.
The MSM is completely discredited.
No realistic prospects for a 2028 Nominee.
It so sucks to be you that you, @Poon Goon, are cheering on @avenue94 who is arguing semantics at this point, pretending that 'auditors' have a special job that only he knows the rightful purpose of, and at the end of the discussion all his paragraphs he's written can be simplified into what I wrote in the first place.
They Analyze Spending.
You and him constantly debating... or rather @avenue94 is debating and you're sucking his _*__, is just cope and seething from the traumatic month you leftists have suffered through.
Happy Thanksgiving motherfuckers.
![]()
Hope you at least used incognito mode before googling whatever you did. Although it's cool if that's from your stash as well.Given your history in the Warroom, I'm so thankful you feel @avenue94 needed a hype man.
Ended up looking like -
![]()
Hardly traumatizing. Politics isn't my identity or emotional attachment unlike yourself.
What's humorous about this is.... you think this matters.And I don't have a special idea of what auditors do I merely relayed to you what they actually do versus what you think they'll do in this situation. That you have no ability to think critically on your own isn't the world's fault.
Your concern for my incognito mode is about as credible as your long paragraphs about auditing.Hope you at least used incognito mode before googling whatever you did. Although it's cool if that's from your stash as well.
I'm not sure you know what irritable means. I'd recommend checking a dictionary (you should also look up projection while you're at it).'Hardly?' You've been the most irritable leftist in the Warroom since the election results came in.
God forbid that one wants security clearances to be earned and vetted, not used as cheap cronyism to someone with glaring ethical conflicts.What's humorous about this is.... you think this matters.
You're pretending that, or you're plainly dumb, that Elon not being an official federal employee is going to matter. Trump will give him whatever he needs, any security clearances regardless if Elon is or isn't a 'federal employee.'
I'm not sure you know what irritable means.
You think Elon has 'glaring ethical conflicts?'God forbid that one wants security clearances to be earned and vetted, not used as cheap cronyism to someone with glaring ethical conflicts.
You have nothing I want.What do you want to bet that Trump runs a deficit all four years of his term?
Shocking, I know, but it's frowned upon for auditors to have an active financial stake in the entity they are auditing.You think Elon has 'glaring ethical conflicts?'
You really are grasping at straws to justify your claim that Elon isn't only unqualified to lead DOGE, but he apparently is also disqualified.
But it'd be such an easy bet for you since you think Elon is going to find $2 trillion in savings.You have nothing I want.
Shocking, I know, but it's frowned upon for auditors to have an active financial stake in the entity they are auditing.
Quote me ever saying 'I think Elon is going to find $2 Trillion in savings.'But it'd be such an easy bet for you since you think Elon is going to find $2 trillion in savings.
You mean the guy whose businesses heavily rely on federal contracts or subsidies? Ya, that's what I mean.Go ahead, state how Elon has an 'active financial stake' in the federal budget.
Ya I'm sure he'll find $500 billion in actionable savings. Right after Mexico pays for a border wall.Doesn't matter if he finds $500 Billion or $1.9 Trillion or more. This has been a longtime coming and its been needed to be done.
You mean the guy whose businesses heavily rely on federal contracts or subsidies? Ya, that's what I mean.
'Actionable' is the key word in that sentence. I doubt you know what it means.Ya I'm sure he'll find $500 billion in actionable savings. Right after Mexico pays for a border wall.
I can tell you what isn't actionable. Finding $2 trillion in annual budget cuts.You think he's going to recommend the departments that give him his contracts and subsidies be cut?
Hold prediction, Avenue94. Let see if it works out for ya.
'Actionable' is the key word in that sentence. I doubt you know what it means.
Musk hasn't expressed an opinion about the CA EV credits on Twitter or in an interview.I can tell you what isn't actionable. Finding $2 trillion in annual budget cuts.
And I imagine he'll have his hobby horses when he's making recommendations on what to cut or not cut. Sort of how he is suddenly upset Tesla wouldn't qualify for CA EV credits despite claiming tesla doesn't need them.

Odd that you missed it given how obsessivity you digest Twitter and worship Musk.Musk hasn't expressed an opinion about the CA EV credits on Twitter or in an interview.
You're flailing in this discussion so badly you're projecting what you wish Musk would be feeling about 'bad news.'
This is truly the sherdog law of conservatives injecting trans people into unrelated discussions taken to its max. Bravo.And that's something I'm thankful for on this Thanksgiving. Not only that Musk has 'fuck you money' but that one of his baby-mommas turned his kid trans and got this ball rolling against the movement.
Odd that you missed it given how obsessivity you digest Twitter and worship Musk.
Not trans people.This is truly the sherdog law of conservatives injecting trans people into unrelated discussions taken to its max. Bravo.
It was right below this thread on the forum lol. Hardly took digging. It's curious that you're accusing everyone but Musk of hypocrisy in a cut and dry example of Musk wanting his cake and eating it too.Thank you for confirming you obsess over Musk.
I admit I missed the story, probably because it's not a major news story. Everybody knows alternative-energy leftists in positions of power are hypocrites.
And once again you project your own Musk-obsession onto others.
'Accuse your enemies that you are guilty of.'
It was right below this thread on the forum lol. Hardly took digging. It's curious that you're accusing everyone but Musk of hypocrisy in a cut and dry example of Musk wanting his cake and eating it too.
Never mind his, “haha gay bad!” Insult.No need to be a sore loser, pal.
So long as they don’t touch the NPS
Doesn't matter. The budget passed by congress will almost certainly result in a double digit budget cut for the NPS anyway. That will mean thousands of staff positions cut. Republicans are poison for public lands and recreation. It's all about privatization.
reason.com

@GearSolidMetal has made it clear that he doesn't understand what auditors do and he doesn't want to understand it. All he needs to know is that Elon is involved and that's good enough to make him defend anything to death.That's not the job of GAO to maintain the books of every single department. It's on Congress to act on GAO's recommendations which we know they will never do because Congress is incompetent.