Elections DOGE is formed

I already know your sources are absolute shit considering you lead with the "50 million for condoms in Gaza" lie that Elon made up, that was immediately debunked.

FACT FOCUS: No evidence that $50 million was designated by the US to buy condoms for Hamas

But let's set that aside for now. Is there something nefarious that was "exposed" here? Even if all the rest of the things on this list were accurate (which I know for a fact already, some of them aren't) there's nothing here besides things that the right hates. And if that's the case, have Congress end those programs. That's the legal, responsible way to run the government.

Next add up all of this money that was supposedly spent on these programs. It amounts to a fraction of 1% of the budget of the agency that spends the VAST majority of that money doing things like combatting famine, and providing other humanitarian aid to desperate people around the world.

But they're using THAT list full of trivial BS to justify illegally shutting down the entire agency.

If that's what you think counts as "exposing" Democrats, you need to get your head checked.

Where is the breakdown of where this money went from your link and what it was spent on.

THE FACTS: Trump and his spokesperson appeared to be referring to a grant or grants that USAID awarded to a group called the International Medical Corps worth $102.2 million to provide medical and trauma services in Gaza. The State Department earlier Wednesday described this as an example of “egregious funding” not aligned with American interests or the.
 
None of those things have been proven; the “50 million for condoms in Gaza” claim has been completely disproven; and finally, some of those things, if true, are good.
A mere 600K to assist with family planning services in Latin America? That’s great.
Advancing DEI in Serbia? Don’t know if that’s true, but love it.


Look—I am going to do Elon and Trump a solid. DOGE is trying to eliminate 2 trillion in government waste, and I am going tell you exactly how to do that in one simple step:
Close up the tax loopholes that billionaires like Trump and Musk take advantage of every year.
Done! You’re welcome, America.
Do you know how much money in total these ultra rich fucks skip out on paying every year because of these loopholes? 1.8 trillion dollars. That’s basically the DOGE’s entire financial goal, met very easily. But they’ll never do that.

Wanna go further? Let’s end the cushy government contracts and subsidies awarded to companies like Boeing.
But of course, SpaceX and Starlink are big recipients too, so we won’t see that.

Let’s go further. Let’s *not* go through with Trump’s tax cuts, which are projected to add 5 trillion to the debt.

Let’s go even further and take a look at our bloated ass military. budget.

Instead of any of these things, they are talking about extending the retirement age so you and I both have to work our asses off even longer before we can retire. They’re targeting programs that benefit minorities, Medicare that seniors need, Medicaid that people with low income need. And of course, any media that might criticize Dear Leader, like Politico, NYT, hell, they’re trying to defund PBS FFS, and NPR. Soon we’ll be like North Korea, with only state-run media that praises The Party.

And this will all be dont to us with the excuse that the government just can’t afford it. Bullshit.

Fuck spending US money on the things you listed as "great".

So you want to tax the rich until they are not rich anymore. How has they worked where they have done it. Fine if they are required to pay their share.

Why should taxpayers support media. The government should not support or control media.

I don't agree with some ot the things that the left is saying Trump is going to do but hasn't done yet. If he make cuts to medicaid, medicare and others. I'm fine with going after fraud in those which is what I'm hearing from Trump.
 

U.S. judge declines to block Elon Musk’s DOGE from Labor Department systems,​

  • Judge says plaintiff union has not shown it was harmed
  • Unions fear Musk’s access to sensitive data on probes and competitors
  • Musk’s role raises concerns over dismantling agencies, firing federal workers
A federal judge on Friday declined to block Elon Musk’s government cost-cutting department from accessing the U.S. Department of Labor’s systems, an initial setback for the government employee unions resisting his efforts to shrink the federal bureaucracy.

The temporary ruling by U.S. District Judge John Bates in Washington, D.C., is the first step in a lawsuit against the Labor Department by one of the largest U.S. labor unions, which alleges billionaire Musk could obtain sensitive information about investigations into his own companies and competitors by accessing government computer systems.

Bates ruled that “although the Court harbors concerns about defendants’ alleged conduct,” the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) had not shown it was harmed by the Labor Department’s actions. AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler said in a statement that the decision was “a setback, but not a defeat,” and that the union would provide more evidence to support its claims.

A Department of Labor spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent late on Friday.

President Donald Trump has deputized Musk, the world’s richest person and owner of electric vehicle company Tesla, space technology company SpaceX and other businesses, with leading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, to identify fraud and waste in the government.

Musk’s efforts have alarmed lawmakers and advocacy groups who say he is overstepping his authority by seeking to dismantle agencies responsible for critical government programs and fire federal workers en masse.

Another group of federal employee unions and retirees has sued the Treasury Department to block what it says is the unlawful transmission of sensitive payment records to DOGE personnel. Treasury temporarily agreed on Wednesday not to give further access while the case plays out.




In the Labor Department lawsuit, the AFL-CIO asked the court to block what it said was Musk’s imminent plan to access department systems.

The union, which represents roughly 800,000 government workers, said that would potentially give Musk access to non-public information from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s probes into SpaceX, Tesla and his tunneling company, The Boring Company, as well as investigations into his competitors.

The union also said that in the absence of court intervention, DOGE could access Bureau of Labor Statistics data about the health of the economy and sensitive information about government employees, including the identities of those who have filed worker compensation claims or sought protection for wage and hour complaints.

The White House has said Musk will recuse himself from matters in which he has a conflict of interest. As a so-called special government employee, he is subject to some but not all conflict-of-interest and ethics rules for federal workers. Musk’s rapid takeover of U.S. government agencies has enabled the South African-born businessman to exert unprecedented control over America’s 2.2-million-member federal workforce and begin a dramatic reshaping of government.

Musk has already moved to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development and says USAID is canceling scores of government consulting contracts and underutilized leases.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/08/us-...musks-doge-from-labor-department-systems.html
 
Weird, why they tried to kill Trump 2 times
 
Apparently Elon is spending tens of millions on superbowl ads related to DOGE lol
 
The criminal politicians crying about DOGE going after USAID are exposing themselves real bad. What are they so mad about? Hmmmmm
 

20250209-000651.jpg


<{nope}>
 
Fuck spending US money on the things you listed as "great".

So you want to tax the rich until they are not rich anymore. How has they worked where they have done it. Fine if they are required to pay their share.

Why should taxpayers support media. The government should not support or control media.

I don't agree with some ot the things that the left is saying Trump is going to do but hasn't done yet. If he make cuts to medicaid, medicare and others. I'm fine with going after fraud in those which is what I'm hearing from Trump.
Oh I’m talking about corporations paying ZERO dollars in federal tax.
In 2024, Tesla brought in 2 billion in income, and paid NOTHING in tax.

Here’s 55 more corporations that use loopholes to pay nothing.

Donald Trump himself hasn’t paid a penny in federal taxes in years.
I just filed my taxes, and I paid my share—I assume you did too.
These people, who are the wealthiest among us, paid nothing.
—And if we closed the loopholes that allow them to do this and made them pay their fare share, we’d generate 1.8 trillion dollars per year. And DOGE’s mission would basically be accomplished.

But instead, we’re going to watch these billionaires take aim at USAID, whose PEPFAR AIDS prevention program is credited with saving 25 million lives. They’ll take aim at Medicare that seniors need, and Medicaid that the poor need, they’re trying defund PBS FFS, and they’ll cut allllll sorts of shit because “the government just doesn’t have the money.” It’s nonsense.

Re: media, government shouldn’t control it, but I disagree that they shouldn’t fund it in the form of grants. Most of PBS’s funding comes from donors.
Media is so important to a democratic society that protections for it are in the very 1st Amendment of the Constitution. PBS still follows the Fairness Doctrine. It’s obvious that Trump is going to take aim at any media outlet he thinks might ever criticize him, and try and suppress those and leave the right wing echo chamber outlets intact. Typical fascist behavior.
 
Oh I’m talking about corporations paying ZERO dollars in federal tax.
In 2024, Tesla brought in 2 billion in income, and paid NOTHING in tax.

Here’s 55 more corporations that use loopholes to pay nothing.

Donald Trump himself hasn’t paid a penny in federal taxes in years.
I just filed my taxes, and I paid my share—I assume you did too.
These people, who are the wealthiest among us, paid nothing.
—And if we closed the loopholes that allow them to do this and made them pay their fare share, we’d generate 1.8 trillion dollars per year. And DOGE’s mission would basically be accomplished.

But instead, we’re going to watch these billionaires take aim at USAID, whose PEPFAR AIDS prevention program is credited with saving 25 million lives. They’ll take aim at Medicare that seniors need, and Medicaid that the poor need, they’re trying defund PBS FFS, and they’ll cut allllll sorts of shit because “the government just doesn’t have the money.” It’s nonsense.

Re: media, government shouldn’t control it, but I disagree that they shouldn’t fund it in the form of grants. Most of PBS’s funding comes from donors.
Media is so important to a democratic society that protections for it are in the very 1st Amendment of the Constitution. PBS still follows the Fairness Doctrine. It’s obvious that Trump is going to take aim at any media outlet he thinks might ever criticize him, and try and suppress those and leave the right wing echo chamber outlets intact. Typical fascist behavior.

I agree it's wrong for them to pay no taxes. The democrats should introduce a clean bill to close the loopholes in this. Then let's see who votes against it.

I don’t agree with the government funding media.

I don't agree with state run media and that's what that is.
 
I agree it's wrong for them to pay no taxes. The democrats should introduce a clean bill to close the loopholes in this. Then let's see who votes against it.

I don’t agree with the government funding media.

I don't agree with state run media and that's what that is.
Sen Tammy Baldwin just introduced a bill the other say to close one of those loopholes, the carried interest loophole. Trump is actually on record saying he wants to close that loophole, so we’ll see. He said it just the other day, in fact. But Trump said it back when he was POTUS the first time, but they didn’t do that in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Let’s keep an eye on that bill (and yes, it seemed like a clean bill to me when I read it.).
 
Where is the breakdown of where this money went from your link and what it was spent on.

THE FACTS: Trump and his spokesperson appeared to be referring to a grant or grants that USAID awarded to a group called the International Medical Corps worth $102.2 million to provide medical and trauma services in Gaza. The State Department earlier Wednesday described this as an example of “egregious funding” not aligned with American interests or the.

Ah yes, the Dems have been EXPOSED because USaid was providing "medical and trauma services in Gaza".

What a pathetic excuse for a complete BS story. You're a fucking clown if you believe a single word of that.
 
Oh I’m talking about corporations paying ZERO dollars in federal tax.
In 2024, Tesla brought in 2 billion in income, and paid NOTHING in tax.

Here’s 55 more corporations that use loopholes to pay nothing.

Donald Trump himself hasn’t paid a penny in federal taxes in years.
I just filed my taxes, and I paid my share—I assume you did too.
These people, who are the wealthiest among us, paid nothing.
—And if we closed the loopholes that allow them to do this and made them pay their fare share, we’d generate 1.8 trillion dollars per year. And DOGE’s mission would basically be accomplished.

But instead, we’re going to watch these billionaires take aim at USAID, whose PEPFAR AIDS prevention program is credited with saving 25 million lives. They’ll take aim at Medicare that seniors need, and Medicaid that the poor need, they’re trying defund PBS FFS, and they’ll cut allllll sorts of shit because “the government just doesn’t have the money.” It’s nonsense.

Re: media, government shouldn’t control it, but I disagree that they shouldn’t fund it in the form of grants. Most of PBS’s funding comes from donors.
Media is so important to a democratic society that protections for it are in the very 1st Amendment of the Constitution. PBS still follows the Fairness Doctrine. It’s obvious that Trump is going to take aim at any media outlet he thinks might ever criticize him, and try and suppress those and leave the right wing echo chamber outlets intact. Typical fascist behavior.
Yeah that's absolutely fucked, it's insane that they can pay no taxes.
 
So the first step in creating more efficiency in government, is to create and and fund an entire new government agency?

We're off to a good start you fucking 'tards.
That s a very stupid thing to say. If this department is staffed with a 1000 people and a budget of a 100M but cuts a billion in spendings and lays off 10,000 people it still makes sense.

It‘s like investments, you are cash negative at first. Interesting that 49 posters liked that idiotic observation of yours
 
.
 
Last edited:
Weird how these guys are taking a close victory as a sweeping mandate, especially in light of historically low approval.

If they think THIS victory was convincing, I wonder how they felt about Obama's victory, and how the GOP reacted to it. I remember Mitch talking about how their mission was to stop every single thing Obama tried, despite Obama's HUGE public approval.

And then, when Trump beat Hilary, Mitch predicted the DEMOCRATS would be obstructionist.

Fuck these guys, nothing they ever say means anything, and the will of the people means nothing to them.

How about crying more?

 
Back
Top