- Joined
- Feb 15, 2011
- Messages
- 22,779
- Reaction score
- 23,858
But only if “they” want him to *wink*Oh a year round patriotism spree in the exact year trump will be trying hard to extend his term.
But only if “they” want him to *wink*Oh a year round patriotism spree in the exact year trump will be trying hard to extend his term.
Superficially it seems like waste but most of the time when we see these types of programs they're measuring something specific. In this case, my guess is that they're studying the impact of a particular type of steroid on aggression or something similar.
Is that waste? Really depends on why the study was commissioned.
That's the problem with these headline style approaches. Without the proper details, it's nigh impossible to judge what's being assessed.
$3 million to put hamsters on steroids on watch them cage fight?
lol… UFC wants its cut
Perfect video on how most govt employees are useless and incompetent
And it’s not far off. I’ve worked around govt employees for most of my career as a general contractor
Less government spending and more fiscal responsibility is definitely something we can all agree upon.
I wonder what’s going to happen when Trump charges secret service 300% above civilian rates to rent rooms and golf carts at his Hotels again. Elon gonna say anything?
Probably not. Elon's going to be overbilling the US for Starlink by then.Less government spending and more fiscal responsibility is definitely something we can all agree upon.
I wonder what’s going to happen when Trump charges secret service 300% above civilian rates to rent rooms and golf carts at his Hotels again. Elon gonna say anything?
You're still ducking. They routinely explain why they raised prices during earnings calls and investorr days. So again, please point me to these examples where and increase in high earner income tax increased prices of goods and services.Name a product that's price was risen and the store announces exactly why its price was risen.
Then compare those two or three examples you're about to post to the tens of thousands of price increases for products across a year.
As a tech bro, I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
She and the party proposed rolling back several of those tax cuts that didn't hep middle income and lower folks much. And christ you are dumb. Can you point me to which economic downturns occured after taxes on the rich rose?And 'President Kamala' would have continued the Trump tax cuts or there'd be a big downturn in the economy, as there always is when taxes for the rich rise.
What's the problem with updating it once a week? I see you keep moving goalposts because you didn't pay attention in your high school civics class.They update their website once a week.
Wow... such a great example of quality work by a federal department.
And who are these Democrats?This isn't a 'But the Republicans did it worse' issue while the Democrats are still criticizing their own leadership for not spending enough money on bullshit like sex changes for illegals and prisoners.
You're still ducking. They routinely explain why they raised prices during earnings calls and investorr days. So again, please point me to these examples where and increase in high earner income tax increased prices of goods and services.
So again, please point me to these examples where and increase in high earner income tax increased prices of goods and services.I've listened to investor calls and the execs routinely give the same canned and non-specific answers that are just meant to satisfy stock owners who's highest priority is the stock price goes up.
And everybody knows those calls are public and execs don't give answers leading to negative headlines that cause the stock price to plummet.
So while you leftists pretend that taxes and inflation have no bearing on the costs of everyday goods and housing, the last five years are proof they have a major effect.
So taxes were cut and then the costs of everday goods and housing rose? That seems to prove the opposite of what you claim.So while you leftists pretend that taxes and inflation have no bearing on the costs of everyday goods and housing, the last five years are proof they have a major effect.
Naw, you can do that yourself.
Nothing wrong with admitting that you don't know what you're talking about. At least your intellectual flailing about is entertaining.
Because supply of homes had not kept up with population growth is the number 1 reason. You're welcome.Who's admitting they don't know what they're talking about?
Basically you're admitting you have no idea why prices rise over the years & decades.
You have no idea why homes in the 1950s were so cheap.
![]()
Who's admitting they don't know what they're talking about?
Basically you're admitting you have no idea why prices rise over the years & decades.
You have no idea why homes in the 1950s were so cheap.
![]()
I'm a bit concerned about what they're going to cut. Fox News did a segment recently complaining about things like butterfly research lmao. Like of all things they could find isn't that one pretty important? Am I the only one that feels like this country has become really anti-science over the past few years?
Because supply of homes had not kept up with population growth is the number 1 reason. You're welcome.
You tell me.And...... what are the other reasons?
08 soured a lot of appetites, it takes forever to get permits to build, and existing homeowners tend to try and reduce the supply of housing and inflate the value of their good. Surely they taught you this in the civics and econ classes you weren't paying attention in.And why are home builders not building enough homes? Laziness?
Some have, some haven't, you'd have to be specific.And what about everyday goods? Why have they multiplied in costs over the decades?
You tell me.
Name one product that is the same price today, in US dollars, and readily available, than it was in the 1950s.Some have, some haven't, you'd have to be specific.
Naw, you can do that yourself.