Do you think Emma Watson has hit the "Wall?"

1*P208ToGToV4vURjFxvP6VQ.png


Rag Doll livin' in a movie
Hot tramp Daddy's little cutie



Look on her face says it all
 
I always thought she was beautiful. A bit skinny, but I loved her face. But yeah, she is either going to become a butch lesbian in the next 10 years or she will just go total wacko, have no kids of her own and adopt a bunch of kids from Africa and have her nanny raise them. Then, in her mid 40s she will start dating younger hip weird guys like Beckensale is doing.

It s all very brave imo.
 
What does hitting the wall mean? Like she’ll never be married now or something?
 
Pretty damn brilliant!

All seriousness though, I completely get what you mean. It's more of a general female quality though. With makeup, great lighting, and the right angles women can look amazing. But you catch them in a normal shot and they often look pretty average at best.

It's a weird phenomena where you can go to bed with a smoking hot girl and wake up next to a demon. One of the biggest things I have for women I wind up dating is that they look pretty natural without all the shit on their face.

Yeah, any woman that has the cake-face look; is a hard pass for me. A little definition is fine, but when she has loads of makeup on all the time, yeah something is a foot.

As for Watson, she is just average most of the time for me. She has a rather appealing face, but no real body to speak of. Obviously she is by no means ugly, just "eh" for me.
 
Why? I think most women in their 20s are not mature enough to have children.

And biologically speaking the best time to have children is before 20.

Most huh? Been my experience that more that have kids young like that adjust their lives for the kid pretty well.
 
LOL. She just turned 30.

You have to be a complete idiot to marry at 20something these days.
You shouldn't extrapolate your own perceptions onto others in this area. It's great you have a diverse range of interests and a worldview that means you couldn't personally think of settling prior to 30.
But others have a different outlook and thats totally valid also.
The biological imperative is also widely different for females than males, and also wildly different within the gender. It's not something we can easily relate to.
And take it from someone who has just been through two pregnancies over several years and several issues including assisted reproduction... 30 - 35 does represent a potential step change in risk factors and challenges.
Anyway you're a good dude and I like your posts but you missed the mark here and your subsequent posts on the topic.
 
Probably. The only difference from back then is that now she looks like a mature 12 year old boy
 
Last edited:
Back
Top