- Joined
- May 11, 2016
- Messages
- 17,595
- Reaction score
- 13,055
@oldshadow Come on dude, you can figure this out. Why dont you THINK Biden-- a 50 year DC insider-- would not release the list?
If Trump was on some list why didn't Biden and the democrats publish that when he was running for president. They were in charge they had everything they were desperate to win at any cost but yet they had the information to destroy him and didn't use it.
That only makes sense to a democrat.
More than ten years. Neither side wants those files released. Trump is probably n the client list along with half the government. Fuck Trump, fuck republicans, and fuck democrats.How has either party tried to disclose the facts? Both have had ample opportunity.
How long has it been, ten years? Why all the sudden is the WSJ publishing info about money transfers that happened a long time ago?
Because too many of his friends are on it.@oldshadow Come on dude, you can figure this out. Why dont you THINK Biden-- a 50 year DC insider-- would not release the list?
Because too many of his friends are on it.
I mean it's obvious there's nobody more interested in protecting Trump than the Comeys, the whole FBI staff, obviously SDNY and Clinton appointed judges are maga country.Epstein was killed to protect Trump...that much is obvious...and I'm glad you agree
Maxwell ain't saying a peep and likely never will... isn't it strange
I'm upset that the WSJ and others choose now to begin discloser. This all should have happened a decade ago. There is way too much shit going on behind the scenes. The press is controlled by billionaires and does not have our best interest at heart. Same with our elected representatives.More than ten years. Neither side wants those files released. Trump is probably n the client list along with half the government. Fuck Trump, fuck republicans, and fuck democrats.
There are eye-witness accounts of Trump getting head from a teenager. Her friend was illegal, working at MAL, so Trump leveraged that deportation threat into a blowjob. She had to show her how. Sick sick, bro.Maybe the real Epstein list was the friends we made along the way.
But if there is a list Trump is definitely on it.
Damn you are tribal. lol at trying to “pizzagate”.Lol at you having to pretend you don't even know what blackmail means after your pizzagate CT fell apart.
You are the one who decides everything based on party.Oh I know you don't assume ALL are guilty, you very carefully select those assumptions based on political relevance.
Again, NOONE has had any evidence against them released related to Epstein. Not ONE person. No one. None. And now, the ONE person with the authority to make files public is calling it all a hoax. lol. After campaigning on making records public. That’s the guy you are certain isn’t implicated in any way. A guy we factually know was very close with Epstein for over 15 years. Yet you’re asking why trump isn’t the ONLY guy to be outed related to Epstein. Trump somehow not being the ONLY person outed means he must not be implicated. lol.I'll ask for the 85th time, which you'll bitch out and duck again, why would the FBI, the entire southern district of NY office including Comey's daughter, the Clinton appointed judge of the case, Biden's DOJ, Obama's before that, Robert Mueller and his entire team all have evidence of Trump banging children and just leave it around the office and never say a word about it? Not a single one of you has even attempted to answer because it ruins your pizzagate CT, so you all just deflect until someone smarter than you can come up with an answer for you to copy, becasue you can't admit you got duped into believing a CT that doesn't even make sense.
Making new friends I see...You sound really angry. I think I liven up the WR quite a bit. On your request, I stopped using terms. Shake my hand on that one? Otherwise, I don't give one rat's ass about your putrid life. I have a set of morals. You do not. Yours sway in the wind with whatever your party says.
I don't think I "shit on" these forums. @Strychnine @helax @Islam Imamate @Madmick @Dillydilly @Limbo Pete @Cajun @fingercuffs @Neck&Neck and I'm sorry if I left people out but last but not least....my favorite in game hustler @KDR by RNC Ride or fucking die.
Trump and his crazy online cheerleaders used the Epstein info on himself, the Dems are simply seizing the opportunity to damage him, for once something is sticking to Teflon don.They are now using the Epstein info against Trump.
Public getting played.
Ah, so that's your problem. It wasn't a fumble, bitch.I'm a Raiders fan I'm not hard to spot. I'm not hiding.
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration knew before and after the 2016 election that Russia did not affect the vote’s outcome through cyberattacks, according to a bombshell document released by the Trump administration Friday.
Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard made public more than 100 pages of emails, memos and other records cataloguing what she called Obama officials’ “conspiracy to subvert President Trump’s 2016 victory.”
Both before and after Democrat Hillary Clinton’s loss, the US Intelligence Community assessed that Russia played no significant role influencing the election.
ma-admin-assessed-russia-played-no-role-in-2016-election-declassified-documents-show/
------------------------------------------------------
That's called treason. They literally manufactured intelligence to undermine a candidate and U.S. President. It was all a DemocraticParty made up set of lies. The declassified documents show it all.
![]()
![]()
That 100% knew it was bullshit and did nothing but allow it.
But I can't help think there is a behind the scenes turning on him. With the way the WSJ magically has decade old financial data on the Epstein case? Where was this info ten years ago and why tease us now?Trump and his crazy online cheerleaders used the Epstein info on himself, the Dems are simply seizing the opportunity to damage him, for once something is sticking to Teflon don.
Why would that prevent them from prosecuting Trump? You think it's just their deep sense of fairness and they all sat around and said "fair is fair, if we prosecute Trump or leak info on him, we'd have to do it to everyone else too?Because there are democrats who are on the list/files too.
There I answered it. I'm not a treehouse cuck like @WklySportsMemes I'm not beholden to a 'side' that I have to run cover for.
But then the flipside is that I'm not on your side either. So now you can tell us why you you think a bunch of democrats are on the list but you don't think Trump was on the list.
As dishonest as some of the Epstein attacks against Trump have been I'm not surprised to read that as a result Trump's popularity has increased.
Trump's Approval Has Gone *UP* Since the Epstein Files Circus
![]()
Trump's Approval Ratings During the Epstein Files Case Can Be Summed Up With Two Words
Trump's approval has risen amidst the Epstein controversy, defying expectations among GOP voters.townhall.com
I have wondered the same. I think this is part of the reason people think he was an agent of the state or something. I think Trump promised to release the files before knowing what was in the files. I think if he thought that it would incriminate him he would never have even offered it. But I think whoever is in there is important enough that both sides have ignored it. It's got to be one of the strangest scenarios where both sides have had power but nothing has come out. And they still have Maxwell who they could offer a deal and release her give her a million dollars whatever the case if they really wanted to find out more. Whatever is in there is big enough like you say to shake things up a little too much for the government's liking. I don't hear of any news agencies trying to interview her either. Maybe there are and I just haven't seen any attempts. But everything has been closed so tightly it's very strangeWhat if there is enough evidence to show leaders from both parties were compromised by a foreign government?
It's clear both parties have tried to keep this under wraps but Trump has tried to play both sides of the fence. At times he has been all in on Epstein discloser with his words but his actions have always been all in at keeping it buried.
I wonder if our government has kept it buried because it's too embarrassing and damaging to the integrity of the system. Too many people from both sides were/are compromised is my guess.
I don't know the motivation of the wsj, maybe Murdoch has decided it's time this idiot has to go and he feels he can't get what he wants out of him. The fact is this whole thing was sitting quietly in some file cabinet until the likes of bongino and others stirred it up, trump didn't stamp it out but indicated he would clear it all up once and for all, he lied of course like he does about everything, and it's come back to bite him.But I can't help think there is a behind the scenes turning on him. With the way the WSJ magically has decade old financial data on the Epstein case? Where was this info ten years ago and why tease us now?